You are too biased on this subject to realize you are mocking your own idiotic criticisms.
Yeah.... you guys bitch at every little thing, it's completely out of touch with reality. That's why we keep having these moronic arguments.
You guys think every little thing is a referendum on his effectiveness as a coach, when in reality, coaches have many levels of success with things that are within the purview of "coaching style." Look at Tony Dungy.
Actually that's not true, considering I am not arguing what these guys are arguing and never have. I don't feel that I nitpick Garrett and I definitely give him credit when I feel it is warranted - I've credited him several times.
So no, I am not biased on the subject. Just want to win.
I'd love to be wrong on Garrett.
And it is precisely the nitpicks that someone who thinks he is average would be least likely to defend him over.
Though I express no opinion over whether him arguing with refs often enough is actually a nitpick.
It's just every little thing said about him, you can't just let go. That tells me a lot about how you truly think about him, despite what you say.
Notice how I didn't jump in and say, "Yeah! He needs to argue with refs more!"
So who is biased here, again? This is exactly what I was pointing out.