Divisional Round Playoff Chatter | Cowboys vs Packers | 1/11/2015

Status
Not open for further replies.

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
37,863
That would be number 1.

#2 Inability to recover fumble on kickoff

#3 Shotgun pass on third and short

#4 Idiotic adherence to empty set passing. Especially on second and long. I'm not talking second and 20, I'm talking 2nd and 8 which we were in a lot, and here comes the no RB sets. Seriously, do we even have five guys who are threats to make a play in the passing game out of empty set?

1 Bryant
2 Witten
3 Williams
4 Beasley

Who else?

Surely not Escobust, Street, Hanna or Harris.

So if you must throw a fuck ton of receivers out there, the best set would be 4 wide with Bryant, Williams, Beasley, and Witten with fumbling fuck in the backfield.

Yep. The fumble, the three successive decisions at the end of the half, the non-recovery on the kickoff, and obviously The Call.

A bunch of huge plays.
 

vince

Not So New Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
931
Yep. The fumble, the three successive decisions at the end of the half, the non-recovery on the kickoff, and obviously The Call.

A bunch of huge plays.
I knew the game was over when Romo took the sack for a 3 yard loss when he was flushed out of the pocket.
 

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
37,863
I honestly think that's more of a hindsight criticism. If Baily make the kick (which he does at least 8 times out of ten), it's not even brought up whether or not it's the right call.
Not hindsight for me. I was calling for a punt as soon as the false start happened.

From 45, the FG is the right call. From 50? In that situation? Bad idea.
 

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
37,863
I knew the game was over when Romo took the sack for a 3 yard loss when he was flushed out of the pocket.
And that was a forgotten big play too. Big fuckup by Romo. Throw it away.

Otherwise the next play to Beasley is a 1st down and the play to dez either doesn't happen or the blown call isn't a big deal.

Thanks Romo!
 

Texas Ace

Teh Acester
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
23,476
That would be number 1.

#2 Inability to recover fumble on kickoff

#3 Shotgun pass on third and short
These are also my top 3 key reasons why they lost.


#4 Idiotic adherence to empty set passing. Especially on second and long. I'm not talking second and 20, I'm talking 2nd and 8 which we were in a lot, and here comes the no RB sets. Seriously, do we even have five guys who are threats to make a play in the passing game out of empty set?
I brought this up in the obituary thread.

We're knowingly making our lives more difficult while making it easier on the defense when we do this, and I simply cannot understand the thought process behind that.

The other thing it does is it makes it harder to find an open man because when you go to empty backfield, it's obvious that the only thing you're going to do is pass so it allows the defense to commit all of its resources to stopping the pass. You then have 5 guys trying to get open against 7 or even 8, so of course you're going to struggle to consistently get open.

These dummies need to use the running game to their advantage and line up in more sets that give both a run and pass look so they can have more favorable matchups for their pass catchers.
 

Texas Ace

Teh Acester
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
23,476
And that was a forgotten big play too. Big fuckup by Romo. Throw it away.

Otherwise the next play to Beasley is a 1st down and the play to dez either doesn't happen or the blown call isn't a big deal.

Thanks Romo!
There is absolutely no excuse for taking a sack that far out of the pocket.

Throw the shit away.
 

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,700
IIRC, the Packers took the ball down the field and scored after the Murray fumble. That's a potential 14 point swing if you consider that we had momentum and most likely would have scored had he not fumbled.

The missed FGs was a six point swing considering that Green Bay took over on downs and scored a FG.
Academic. 6 more points would still have won thegame.
 

BipolarFuk

Demoted
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
11,464
I really don't have much hope for a championship in the future.

Not with QBs like Aaron Rodgers blocking our path. He's better on one leg than a healthy Romo.

I guess we can hope for injuries.
 

Texas Ace

Teh Acester
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
23,476
I really don't have much hope for a championship in the future.

Not with QBs like Aaron Rodgers blocking our path. He's better on one leg than a healthy Romo.

I guess we can hope for injuries.
We can beat that team with a good defense.

Hell, if we had just a slightly better defense, we win that game yesterday even with all the failed opportunities and blunders. They aren't that much better than us and there's no reason to think we can't make another run next year if both Romo plays well and this defense plugs some holes.
 

BipolarFuk

Demoted
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
11,464
We can beat that team with a good defense.

Hell, if we had just a slightly better defense, we win that game yesterday even with all the failed opportunities and blunders. They aren't that much better than us and there's no reason to think we can't make another run next year if both Romo plays well and this defense plugs some holes.
It will take a lot of improvements on defense to beat a healthy Aaron Rodgers in a playoff setting.
 

Texas Ace

Teh Acester
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
23,476
It will take a lot of improvements on defense to beat a healthy Aaron Rodgers in a playoff setting.
Not as many as you'd think.

3 players would make a world of difference. That's not asking too much.
 

1bigfan13

Your favorite player's favorite player
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
27,181
Not as many as you'd think.

3 players would make a world of difference. That's not asking too much.
I agree.

If (and its a big if) we can get a healthy Sean Lee on the field along with a decent edge rusher and a cover safety, I'd love our shot at beating the Packers with a healthy Rodgers.
 

vince

Not So New Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
931
I agree.

If (and its a big if) we can get a healthy Sean Lee on the field along with a decent edge rusher and a cover safety, I'd love our shot at beating the Packers with a healthy Rodgers.
I have hope for D-Law next season. I gave him the benefit of the doubt coming off a fractured foot.
 

p1_

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 10, 2013
Messages
26,604
I agree the outcome would be vastly different if we had any real pressure yesterday. There was virtually none. Defense wins in the playoffs.
 

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
37,863
We can beat the Packers right now, as is. We showed that yesterday.

Change one play - the murray fumble - and that's our game.
 

BipolarFuk

Demoted
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
11,464
We can beat the Packers right now, as is. We showed that yesterday.

Change one play - the murray fumble - and that's our game.
OK, change the fumble.

Green Bay gets a change too. Aaron Rodgers is completely healthy.

We get our fucking doors blown off.
 

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
37,863
OK, change the fumble.

Green Bay gets a change too. Aaron Rodgers is completely healthy.

We get our fucking doors blown off.
I didn't see him particularly effected by the injury. Bothered by it? Sure. Not effected by it.

Exactly how you'd describe Romo's back injury.

Neither injury had any real effect on the game.
 

Carp

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
15,194
Not hindsight for me. I was calling for a punt as soon as the false start happened.

From 45, the FG is the right call. From 50? In that situation? Bad idea.
I was not all that enthused for the 45 yarder. I felt like Bailey was shaky down the stretch for whatever reason.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom