- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 60,065
Maybe it was a hoax...The moon landing hoax people are serious yet Armstrong and Aldrin never sued. I mean, that's a deliberate attack on their reputations.
Maybe it was a hoax...The moon landing hoax people are serious yet Armstrong and Aldrin never sued. I mean, that's a deliberate attack on their reputations.
The moon landing hoax people are serious yet Armstrong and Aldrin never sued. I mean, that's a deliberate attack on their reputations.
I don't believe it's a hoax at all. But ironically enough I'm listening to Rogan selling the very slight possibility it's a hoax in his interview with Matt Walsh.Maybe it was a hoax...
Yeah whole thing about radiation around the earth that people believe humans couldn't go through at the time.I may have told this before (or maybe just to Cotton) but my dad tells the story that when he was an engineer at General Dynamics in those days, he and my mom went to the lake with another more aeronautical guy with the company and the guy swore that we did not have the technology to do that yet.
Now I don't believe that, because didn't we leave a mirror or some reflective something there that could be seen from Earth? But kind of interesting that someone in that industry in those days didn't think it was possible.
We’ve sent a lot of probes, satellites, etc with highly sophisticated and sensitive equipment onboard that survived those Van Allen belts and they not only survive but transmit data back to the earth through them, so I don’t see an issue with humans passing through them for short durations.Yeah whole thing about radiation around the earth that people believe humans couldn't go through at the time.
Space stations don't go that far.
Just to be clear I agree.We’ve sent a lot of probes, satellites, etc with highly sophisticated and sensitive equipment onboard that survived those Van Allen belts and they not only survive but transmit data back to the earth through them, so I don’t see an issue with humans passing through them for short durations.
For over 400,000 contractors and government employees to keep a conspiracy like that under wraps to the point where even 50+ years later all anyone can provide is conjecture is impossible.
It absolutely was an inside job. If nothing else, WTC7 has zero explanation to it collapsing.
I am amazed that as the years go by, people forget the lies.It absolutely was an inside job. If nothing else, WTC7 has zero explanation to it collapsing.
Then how did WTC7 fall all on it's own?I am highly skeptical that it was an inside job. It's very hard to believe.
There are a lot of inside things that make it confusing. But it was not some rando terrorist attack. There were too many things fucked up for it to roll like they would like.I am highly skeptical that it was an inside job. It's very hard to believe.
Jet fuel. Etc.Then how did WTC7 fall all on it's own?
Then how did WTC7 fall all on it's own?
With a CIA operative as the planner?I don't know, maybe. But I don't think my lack of understanding of the physics of all this means that I have to leap to such a nefarious conclusion as our own government did it.
I'm open to anything but until I see compelling and concrete evidence to the contrary I'm going to have to take what happened as exactly what it looks like. Islamic terrorism.
There are a lot of inside things that make it confusing. But it was not some rando terrorist attack. There were too many things fucked up for it to roll like they would like.
With a CIA operative as the planner?
Sounds good. ‘Murca.