Angrymesscan
DCC 4Life
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 3,796
I think Romo is a better QB than Dak right now, but Dak might be better for this Offense. That's why I would not pull the switch until/if the game gets to big for Dak.
If Dallas gets to the playoffs who do you want to lead the way?
If Dallas gets to the playoffs who do you want to lead the way?
Would anyone be okay if Romo started with change of pace Dak taking five snaps-per-game?
i have a feeling Jerruh may do this. His Razorback 2.0 formation.
Would anyone be okay if Romo started with change of pace Dak taking five snaps-per-game?
i have a feeling Jerruh may do this. His Razorback 2.0 formation.
I would absolutely hate it. You do screwy stuff like that when you don't have a good team. You don't do it when you have an elite offense like we have right now. It's like most gimmick stuff, the only reason to do it is because you can't win with the normal stuff. That's not the situation in Dallas.
If you really believe that Romo gives you the best shot in the playoffs I think the argument could be made that it's better to continue to sit Romo. If you play him now there are 10 games before the playoffs for him to break a collar bone, back, rib or other bone. You're better off waiting as long as possible to put Romo in.

That makes about as much sense as LT's backups need playing time theory. Either he's your best chance at winning, or he isn't. And if he is, he needs to be playing. If the team decides Dak is their best chance, he needs to continue playing.
~break glass in case of playoffs~
![]()
I didn't have a program regarding backups. I had a proposal distinctly for Romo. At least get it right if you want to ridicule it.

That makes about as much sense as LT's backups need playing time theory. Either he's your best chance at winning, or he isn't. And if he is, he needs to be playing. If the team decides Dak is their best chance, he needs to continue playing.
~break glass in case of playoffs~
![]()
Well I'm not one of those people who actually believes Romo is our best chance in the playoffs. But Romo is definitely likely to get hurt if you play him for an extended period of time. Plus it's sort of what the Broncos did last year to win the Superbowl. Except Manning hadn't missed a whole season of football for two years straight like Romo.

Sort of like "very likely"![]()

Well I'm not one of those people who actually believes Romo is our best chance in the playoffs. But Romo is very likely to get hurt if you play him for an extended period of time. Plus it's sort of what the Broncos did last year to win the Superbowl. Except Manning hadn't missed a whole season of football for two years straight like Romo.

I just find it laughable that anyone could think, including our coaching staff and owner, that the guy who has 2 career playoff wins gives us the best chance to win.
Based on what? His outstanding 2-4 playoff record?
![]()
In Romo's defense, he's thrown 8 TD and 2 interceptions in the postseason. If he hadn't gone to the playoffs in 09 without an oline or 14 without a d line, he'd probably be closer to 4-4.I just find it laughable that anyone could think, including our coaching staff and owner, that the guy who has 2 career playoff wins gives us the best chance to win.
Based on what? His outstanding 2-4 playoff record?
![]()
I just find it laughable that anyone could think, including our coaching staff and owner, that the guy who has 2 career playoff wins gives us the best chance to win.
Based on what? His outstanding 2-4 playoff record?
![]()
Apparently according to some you simply need to have experience to be good in the playoffs.