JJT: Free to choose, Cowboys didn't

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
133,305
Free to choose, Cowboys didn't

Shift in philosophy to not pursue older free agents the right call to contend sooner
Updated: May 30, 2013, 3:56 PM ET
By Jean-Jacques Taylor | ESPNDallas.com

NFL veterans Eric Winston, Charles Woodson and Tyson Clabo all were available through free agency to fill roster deficiencies. None were picked up by Dallas. Are the Cowboys realizing this is a young man's game?

IRVING, Texas -- Since NFL free agency began in March, the Dallas Cowboys have passed on tackles Tyson Clabo and Eric Winston. The same goes for safety Charles Woodson and linebacker Brian Urlacher.
Hallelujah.

Finally, someone at Valley Ranch gets it.

You don't win in the NFL by signing over-the-hill faux stars, paying solid players like they're superstars or benching young athletes for dudes who are a notch or two above serviceable.

Jerry Jones has always lived by this credo, so it's unlikely his philosophy has changed.

And since Stephen Jones hasn't talked Jerry out of too many bad ideas lately, let's not give him any credit for this subtle shift in protocol.

Give the credit to Jason Garrett, because it falls in line with the way he wants to build a football team.

Say what you will about Garrett -- much of the criticism he receives is warranted -- but he gives this franchise direction. Maybe you don't like the road he's driving down, but at least he's not driving in circles.

Just so you know, these particular decisions don't have anything to do with the Cowboys being tight against the salary cap. They can always find money and salary-cap space when they need it.

Nope, this is a definite philosophical change.

Just a few years ago, you know the Cowboys would have signed Woodson to fill their glaring hole at safety. Clabo would have been right there too, after the significant issues at right tackle last season.

And Jerry probably would have found a way to get Urlacher on board as well, especially with his former defensive coordinator Rod Marinelli on the Cowboys' staff.

Don't laugh; you know it's true.

Remember the practice-field phone calls during the 2011 training camp, when Jerry and Stephen Jones tried their best to get 30-year-old Nnamdi Asomugha to sign because of the Cowboys' deficiencies at cornerback?

No one will ever forget former defensive coordinator Rob Ryan talking to Asomugha on the horn during practice. Heck, we still chuckle about it every few months.

How did that five-year, $60 million deal with $25 million guaranteed work out for the Philadelphia Eagles? Asomugha intercepted four passes in two seasons, struggled regularly and was released after last season.
This is a young man's game. A team like the Cowboys that is not ready to win a championship this season -- no matter what Jerry says -- gains virtually nothing from signing someone who used to be a star.

Oh, Jerry might sell a few more tickets with players such as Woodson and Urlacher on the field. And perhaps Clabo might help Dallas win another game or two.

But none of those guys is the difference between winning and losing a Super Bowl.

The Cowboys aren't one or two players away from contending for a title. They're five or six players away. Maybe more.

Besides, every snap in organized team activities, minicamp, training camp, practice and games given to a veteran at the end of his career is one fewer repetition a player such as Jermey Parnell, Matt Johnson or Sean Lee has to develop.

For a club that's 16-16 during the past two seasons, that's an awful trade-off.

Woodson, who turns 37 in October, is an eight-time Pro Bowl selection and has been named first-team All-Pro three times. Urlacher has been to eight Pro Bowls and been first-team All-Pro four times.

Both will be inducted into the Pro Football Hall of Fame. Each should be a first-ballot inductee. None of that will help the Cowboys win a game this season.

The NFL is a dirty game, so to speak. While teams pay hefty salaries, the contracts aren't guaranteed and the players often are discarded as soon as their performance dips. Or they're asked to take a pay cut, like the Cowboys requested of Doug Free.

Woodson took the reduced salary and signed with the Oakland Raiders, one of his few suitors. Urlacher chose retirement.

Even good players such as Clabo aren't worth the time for the Cowboys, because when this team gets to be championship-caliber, Clabo will need to be replaced.

Clabo, a starter since his rookie season, played in the 2010 Pro Bowl. But he's 31, and you don't pay age in today's NFL. Besides, you have to wonder why the Atlanta Falcons let him go. You wonder even more when all he commanded on the open market was a one-year deal for $3.5 million from the Miami Dolphins, with less than half guaranteed.

The same goes for the 29-year-old Winston, who started 103 of 108 games in his career. He remains a free agent.

The Cowboys, like most teams, finally understand that it's far better for a team's salary cap and long-term development to give draft picks and young players every opportunity to make the team. They provide a cost-effective talent base and help create the salary-cap space for a team to sign a big-money free agent who is in his prime and worth the money.

Garrett is a smart guy. He gets it.

The Cowboys benefit.
 
JJT is going to the if he is so good defense on Clabo and Winston.

Also...he basically lumps in Winston as an over the hill star, but he is the same age as Free.
 
http://dccforums.com/showthread.php?340-JJT-No-discernible-strategy-for-Cowboys

JJT said:
As mama might say, the Cowboys are lost with no idea where found resides.

When the Pittsburgh Steelers hired Mike Tomlin in 2007, they told him they ran the 3-4 defense -- and if he wanted the job he'd have to run the 3-4 because that's Pittsburgh's identity. Tomlin took the job, and he has been to a pair of Super Bowls.

Your Cowboys have systemic issues throughout their organization that keep them from winning consistently.

They're the type of issues that didn't occur when Tom Landry, Jimmy Johnson and Bill Parcells coached the Cowboys. Then we knew exactly what the Cowboys wanted to do on offense and defense.

JJT said:
Give the credit to Jason Garrett, because it falls in line with the way he wants to build a football team.
 
I think Garrett is due some credit here. Understanding it's a young man's game comes naturally to coaches who drive players on the practice fields every day. To Jerry Jones, the players are shiny collector's pieces he adores from on high.

But as Carp pointed out, Doug Free isn't all that young.

If anyone understands the OL is terrible it has to be Garrett, yet if he has all this influence where in Hell are the god-damned offensive lineman? Someone has to be telling Jerry that Kowalski, Costa, Arkin, Parnell, etc. are studs worth keeping.
 
I think Garrett is due some credit here. Understanding it's a young man's game comes naturally to coaches who drive players on the practice fields every day. To Jerry Jones, the players are shiny collector's pieces he adores from on high.

But as Carp pointed out, Doug Free isn't all that young.

If anyone understands the OL is terrible it has to be Garrett, yet if he has all this influence where in Hell are the god-damned offensive lineman? Someone has to be telling Jerry that Kowalski, Costa, Arkin, Parnell, etc. are studs worth keeping.



That's what bugs me the most. I'd have been jumping up and down on the table for picks that would've strengthened both lines. Hopefully, things turn out well but history does not suggest it will.
 
Even if it is a young man's game, we have the wrong young men to play it. Refusing to sign better players isn't wise, it's just cheap and lazy.
 
So, it's a sign that Garrett's in charge. I don't believe it! What I think is that Jerry learned his lesson with the ancient linebackers, Zach Thomas and the ex-Bronco. He's finally not going after that crap again.
 
If Garrett had as much stroke and is as "in charge" as JJT claims, then Sharrif Floyd would be a Dallas Cowboy, not a Minnesota Viking.
 
I don't get the love for Floyd, I think he's a Marcus Spears type player. He'll be "solid" and never make plays in my estimation. He was evaluated by a scouting staff that thought all year they were scouting for the 3-4.

The organization simply failed to adjust its board for the scheme change out of their usual laziness, complacency and general failure to give a shit.
 
I don't get the love for Floyd, I think he's a Marcus Spears type player. He'll be "solid" and never make plays in my estimation. He was evaluated by a scouting staff that thought all year they were scouting for the 3-4.

The organization simply failed to adjust its board for the scheme change out of their usual laziness, complacency and general failure to give a shit.

I kind of agree. I never really saw the love for Floyd. Not a lot of production at Florida.

However, how do you decide that when you are on the clock? #5 on the board....oh wait, nevermind, not a fit.
 
I kind of agree. I never really saw the love for Floyd. Not a lot of production at Florida.

However, how do you decide that when you are on the clock? #5 on the board....oh wait, nevermind, not a fit.

That's the real frustrating part. Yeah, I get it and Floyd didn't impress me like the other top DTs, but...then why the eff is he on the board? It makes you wonder about the integrity of the rest of it.

Given the fact there were clear 3-4 guys on it...it tells me their closing pre-draft meetings weren't very effective. Not a surprise considering our part-time GM.
 
If Garrett had as much stroke and is as "in charge" as JJT claims, then Sharrif Floyd would be a Dallas Cowboy, not a Minnesota Viking.

I got one for you.

Assuming our board was true, Garrett could have also wanted Patterson too. I know both he and Ciskowski were clearly upset when the trade down happened, but with these clowns, we can't assume it would be for the right reasons.
 
I got one for you.

Assuming our board was true, Garrett could have also wanted Patterson too. I know both he and Ciskowski were clearly upset when the trade down happened, but with these clowns, we can't assume it would be for the right reasons.

could have wanted Eifert as well.
 
I got one for you.

Assuming our board was true, Garrett could have also wanted Patterson too. I know both he and Ciskowski were clearly upset when the trade down happened, but with these clowns, we can't assume it would be for the right reasons.

Good point.
 
It's clear the team didn't respect their board like in the past.

This was a very average draft class. I think Warmack and Lotulelei are very strong and everyone else are "upside" players. NFL-wide the whole first round was a bunch of reaches. The top three OT's were overvalued and that caused every other OL to be overvalued. With no non-rush LB's, RB's, or impact WR's to speak of everyone just picked linemen.

If you had to pick a draft class where it would be OK to fuck your board and go for need, this was it.
 
I'd almost guarantee you that Garrett was upset about passing up Eiffert, not Floyd. That explains Escobar, because Jerry was appeasing Garrett. After making them all sign that kick-ass agreement of course.
 
There were times where JJT was actually a real reporter...Spags has always sucked.
 
That's the real frustrating part. Yeah, I get it and Floyd didn't impress me like the other top DTs, but...then why the eff is he on the board? It makes you wonder about the integrity of the rest of it.

Given the fact there were clear 3-4 guys on it...it tells me their closing pre-draft meetings weren't very effective. Not a surprise considering our part-time GM.

A couple things.

1) There is no reason for Floyd to be off the board entirely. He belongs on it. Despite not being the best fit for the 4-3, he'd still be a productive player.
2) We did keep Floyd on the board... just ignored him. So he might as well have been off.
3) We remove way too many players as bad fits when in reality they should just be downgraded to a lower draft point based on fit.
 
Back
Top Bottom