Graziano: Why Garrett remains in Cowboys' plans

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
140,401
Why Garrett remains in Cowboys' plans

May, 31, 2013

​

By Dan Graziano | ESPNDallas.com


Man, this is a smart, sober take from Jean-Jacques Taylor on Jason Garrett's role in theDallas Cowboys' current management structure and decision-making process. Jacques' premise is that past Cowboys teams would have rushed to sign big-name veteran free agents like Charles Woodson, Brian Urlacher and Tyson Clabo, where this year's Cowboys passed on all of them in favor of a continuation of the program they're working to build. And his conclusion is that Garrett, and his philosophy about how to build a team, is the difference:

Say what you will about Garrett -- much of the criticism he receives is warranted -- but he gives this franchise direction. Maybe you don't like the road he's driving down, but at least he's not driving in circles.


Just so you know, these particular decisions don't have anything to do with the Cowboys being tight against the salary cap. They can always find money and salary-cap space when they need it. Nope, this is a definite philosophical change.

...

The Cowboys, like most teams, finally understand that it's far better for a team's salary cap and long-term development to give draft picks and young players every opportunity to make the team. They provide a cost-effective talent base and help create the salary-cap space for a team to sign a big-money free agent who is in his prime and worth the money.

Garrett is a smart guy. He gets it.

The Cowboys benefit.



​
This is why I don't rush to join the crowd that assumes Garrett is coaching for his job in 2013. Could a bad season cost him his job? Sure. But it's no sure thing that another 8-8 disappointment or a first-round playoff exit or something like that gets Garrett fired. Firing Garrett at this point would represent a dramatic shift in the plan for Cowboys owner Jerry Jones. While it's easy for everyone to characterize Jones as impulsive and rash, I think there's real evidence that he's tired of changing the plan every couple of years to little result.

Jones likes and admires Garrett. He respects his intelligence. He recently referred to him as the team's "premier asset," and I don't think that was just a phrase he threw out there. The sense you get when you spend time around the Cowboys these days is that they're striving to build a sustainable, long-term, successful program, and that they believe they're making progress. Last season's ending stunk for them, again, and the 8-8 records two years in a row are an easy reason for people to point and say there's no progress. But if you followed Dallas' 2012 season, the positives were unmistakable. Their comeback from where they were in early November, with half their defense on IR, to get themselves into a division title game for the second year in a row was a half-season's worth of evidence of the kind of heart they're so often accused of lacking.

Garrett coached the team through on-field adversity and off-field tragedy with no hint of locker room discord, and while his in-game decision-making is often a worthy target of criticism, the fact that you never near anything about player discontentment with him says a lot. Tony Romo led fourth-quarter comebacks without a running game to lean on, and the fact that he threw three interceptions in a Week 17 road loss to a scorching hot Redskins team shouldn't obscure that completely. Dez Bryant, Jason Hatcher and Anthony Spenceremerged as star-caliber players. The Cowboys, up until that Week 17 loss, had plenty on which to build hopes for the future, and that's what Garrett & Co. will sell to their players this offseason.

This is why I think Garrett is more to Dallas right now than just a coach-on-the-hot-seat. I think Jones views him as a key part of the long-range plan. And I'm not as convinced as a lot of people seem to be that Jones is ready to ditch the current plan for a new one -- no matter what happens this season.
 
I approve this message.

Unless a premier, can't fail team builder comes along, I like the direction here. I don't want to change just to change and hope for the best.

I just wish we could add a real GM here. Then we'd be in business.
 
Garrett isn't taking us anywhere. But I do agree with not chasing down every big name FA that comes along, especially near the end of their career, since we aren't just one or two players away.

Reality though is that none of this is really going to matter. Jerry isn't going to hire and give the reins to another top notch HC again. Since Jimmy we've had 6 HC's and only BP fell into that "top notch" category, and even then he was at the end of his career minus most of his established core staff.

I don't see us winning big and making any serious runs with Garrett, but it's all but a given the next guy Jerry hires isn't going to be the type to get us to the top either. Jerry and goof son are enjoying being large and in charge and god forbid either have to walk on eggshells or give up any of the spotlight again. Just like always, when it comes to time to make another coaching change we'll just be clinging to the futile hope of trying to get lucky with whatever HC Jerry hires who'll have JJ's thumb imprint firmly planted on his head.
 
There are several things I disagree with in this article but I will give Jason the benefit of the doubt and see what next season brings. Nothing would please me more than to see us succeed but I'm just not feeling it.
 
So....let's get this straight...it is "progress" we are relying on players like Matt Johnson?

It is progress that we are getting the Doug Frees of the league to take a pay cut instead of signing a real RT?

Bullshit. If that is Garrett's process then EFF him just as much as the Joneses.
 
So....let's get this straight...it is "progress" we are relying on players like Matt Johnson?

It is progress that we are getting the Doug Frees of the league to take a pay cut instead of signing a real RT?

Bullshit. If that is Garrett's process then EFF him just as much as the Joneses.

That's the biggest indicator that Garrett is coaching for his job. Jones won't spend any more money on the Garrett project.
 
So....let's get this straight...it is "progress" we are relying on players like Matt Johnson?

It is progress that we are getting the Doug Frees of the league to take a pay cut instead of signing a real RT?

Bullshit. If that is Garrett's process then EFF him just as much as the Joneses.

Yeah...the Free thing is just stupid. He would not be here if he did not take the pay cut, which had nothing to do with Free.
 
Wasn't Garrett the HC in 2011, when we tried to sign Asomugha? So why is this suddenly part of Garrett's plan to not sign aging FAs? Perhaps we didn't sign these aging FAs this year simply because Garrett or the front office is overvaluing our current talent at safety and right tackle.

Regardless, the media is assigning the current direction to Garret's plan on shaky evidence. Why did he not want to follow that plan 2 years ago? In fact, one could argue Garret had more pull then than he does now after 2 mediocre seasons. It's hard for me to imagine that Jerry would listen more to Garrett now than back at the beginning when Garrett seemed like more of an up and comer.

Regarding these specific free agents, they would be worth signing because you aren't breaking the bank Asomugha style on any of them. They are all cheap one or two year deals. So there is no cap issue. And they aren't progress stoppers. We have nobody at RT, and if Johnson is any good, he'd either beat out Woodson in legit competition' or learn from him and take over after a year. He could certainly benefit from that relationship for a year given where he came from and his missing last season.
 
In fact, it would have been smarter to sign Clabo this season than it was to give Carr that contract last season.
 
In fact, it would have been smarter to sign Clabo this season than it was to give Carr that contract last season.

Apples and oranges. CB was desperately needed and Carr was considered the best in the open market at the start of free agency. RT is an equal need, but Clabo was on the street for weeks and signed a 1 year deal for 3.5 mil. At this point in his career given the deal he signed, Clabo is little better than a JAG. He might have a 1 last hurrah Brian Waters in New England kind of year, but clearly the league believes Clabo is an average player.

Carr is not average. Street CB's and JAGs can't do what Carr did last year. In Dallas the corners have to play with little to no consistent pressure up front. You could argue he won the Cincy and Pittsburgh games and was a major part of winning the first Giants game. His worst game was Chicago, but overall the guy did everything you could ask from staying healthy, to being an RKG, to even playing safety in a pinch.
 
Carr has been catching some negativity of late, but I still love the player and the contract. Hopefully he is used properly because he is still a top flight CB.
 
Carr is a fine player but signing him was bad because it was obvious we didn't need the best CB on the market, and there were plenty of mid level guys who would have sufficed. We could have signed 2 of them and had excellent depth at CB, with Jenkins and Scandrick as well, for a fraction of the price it cost to get just Carr.

But then trading two primo assets to get Claiborne was the icing on the ass rape cake.
 
I still like the player and the contract.
 
Carr is a fine player but signing him was bad because it was obvious we didn't need the best CB on the market, and there were plenty of mid level guys who would have sufficed. We could have signed 2 of them and had excellent depth at CB, with Jenkins and Scandrick as well, for a fraction of the price it cost to get just Carr.

But then trading two primo assets to get Claiborne was the icing on the ass rape cake.

I really like each player and the way each was acquired was appropriate, but getting both was overkill.
 
When were the Cowboys about signing a bunch of big-name FA? Hell, these are the guys who went on vacation on the first day of FA years ago.

This isn't Dan Snyder we're talking about.
 
They did not keep Free because of some kind of philosophy about FA's and age. That is giving these retards way too much credit. Free is still on the team because cutting him would make Jerry look bad for giving him a big contract.
 
I really like each player and the way each was acquired was appropriate, but getting both was overkill.

I don't think getting Carr and Claiborne was overkill. It was clear Jenkins wasn't the answer, and that's a wasted first, so you'd have to go out and get Claiborne to replace him. Carr and Claiborne are two really good starting corners.

It was expensive, but corners are, and we haven't had a pair of starters that were this caliber in gosh.....I don't even know. I guess since the 90's.
 
I would have liked to have Urlacher to stick it to the Bears.

Yeah, overpaying for a guy that can't run anymore would really be sticking it to our arch rival Bears.

I'd sign him if/when Sean Lee gets injured though.
 
Yeah, overpaying for a guy that can't run anymore would really be sticking it to our arch rival Bears.

I'd sign him if/when Sean Lee gets injured though.

They should have signed him for two reasons. Insurance for probable injuries, and the main reason, to me, would be to help Sean Lee become even better. Lee is Urlachers heir apparent in the NFL. It would have been nice to let those two work together for a year. The payoff in the long run for Lee, a young player, is WELL worth whatever Urlacher would have asked for a one year deal. But that's me.

Plus, if somebody goes down, well he can still play some.
 
Back
Top Bottom