Negative: Giving up a first for a 30 year old RB
Positive: Not using a first on a CB.
We shouldn't want Adrian Peterson, though I am very curious why Jerry decided to use up 100% of Romo's restructuring space and so late into free agency.
I'd rather have a first round corner then no first round player at all.
Good. Glad to have him. The offseason is shaping up nicely so far.
I couldn't agree more. Why the hell would Dallas be desperate for a back at the end of his career? Especially when one of the deepest RB drafts I can ever remember is quickly approaching. The team that should be desperate is the Vikings who could potentially have a RB that dislikes them so much that he would be willing to sit out a year and who has made it pretty clear that the one team he wants to play for is the Cowboys. Seems to me like Dallas has basically all the leverage in this situation.
We shouldn't want Adrian Peterson, though I am very curious why Jerry decided to use up 100% of Romo's restructuring space and so late into free agency.
It would be incredibly retarded to give up anything above a 4th for peterson.
Agreed. That's what the Pats gave up for Moss.
If I had to bet I'd say it was to make a push to get Dez signed long term. Use the cap room to front load his deal.
No chance for Dez' extension?
But we already have his $13m franchise tag salary on the cap that we can use that for. Or are you saying use all of that plus Romo's? That's be an awful lot of money, but would keep us from being in a position in a few years where have no QB and no cap space.