I'd be looking at Stevan Ridley pretty hard. No way he is getting much money from anyone but could be a nice piece to a backfield, IMO. Just turned 26 and has not been overworked. Coming off a knee injury but a cheap one year deal could really pay off. Doesn't have to be a workhorse.

He makes Murray's fumbling from last year look like in child's play in comparison to his.
I wouldn't hate the move, but I wouldn't be crazy about it either.
agreed, he doesn't want to sign there. I mean, Bradford vs. Romo? His OU school ties can't be that strong.
It's good not to just throw money away, but I'm not sure that means it's always a good thing to not bring key people back.I'd say most everyone with half a brain is pleasantly surprised by the Jerry restraint and the new outlook on spending money, and Michael Irvin is actually encouraging the old bastard to revert to his foolish ways that got us in trouble in the first place.
It has been an issue for him but it has been more emphasized because Belichick is so intolerant of anyone who fumbles. Anyone capable of being a feature RB who would come as cheap as Ridley will is going to have some warts. Not saying Ridley is the answer, but he is certainly someone I would call. He is expected to be physically ready sometime in May.