Clay_Allison
Old Bastard
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2013
- Messages
- 5,488
I also thought Luke Joekel was a better prospect than Fisher.
If Peyton Manning and Andrew Luck are 10.0, Ryan Leaf is a 0.0 (in retrospect), and Eric Fisher an 8.5, I'd say Matthews and Robinson are like 9.6 or 9.7s, Lewan is a 9.0, Martin is an 8.2.
In my mind, Matthews and Robinson are #1 overall pick type tackles, if Clowney wasn't also a transcendant talent. Lewan is a stud, but his grade is more on the level of a Tyron Smith who at the time I really, really liked, but I wasn't ranking him as the best player in the class, either.
Zach Martin is more on the level of a Jonathan Martin when Jonathan Martin came out. Mid first rounder. In a comparison to Tyron Smith's class again, Zach Martin's grade is more like Nate Solder's. I'd be fine with the pick.... but not before Tyron Smith. The two players are definitely not a "toss up." One is clearly better than the other.
Eric Fisher is a very nice player and better than either Martin, but might not be a top 10 pick in this draft and definitely wouldn't be a top 5 pick in this draft. Actually I would have had Luke Joekel ahead of Eric Fisher last year, and Joekel would have been more like 8.8 or 9.0, more up there with Lewan.
I also thought Luke Joekel was a better prospect than Fisher.
Zach Martin is more on the level of a Jonathan Martin when Jonathan Martin came out. Mid first rounder. In a comparison to Tyron Smith's class again, Zach Martin's grade is more like Nate Solder's. I'd be fine with the pick.... but not before Tyron Smith. The two players are definitely not a "toss up." One is clearly better than the other.
Sure there can, but there isn't a clear difference between Martin and Lewan.
Jonathan Martin was a second round pick. He was never regarded as a player that teams coveted.
Zack Martin is considered one of the cleanest prospects in this draft. That is the type of player you would be fortunate to find in the middle of the first round.
Ok, so you agree Mike Evans is a different category though.
So that means among first rounders there can be clear differences.
As I said in the first sentence, after the obvious difference-makers there is little difference. Top ten implies all single digit picks are great prospects, and in my experience it's more like top six or even top four.
In 2013, it was top-none... as in little to no difference between Dion Jordan and Luke Joeckel and Travis Frederick.
There were mocks with Jonathan Martin in the first for weeks. He was usually in the late teens or 20s.
Martin looks like a much better OG prospect than Martin did at OT.
Well what I'm saying is that Lewan is in that group that is the difference makers and Martin isn't.
Then I hope 1) you are right and 2) that he falls to 16.
There is almost zero chance Lewan drops to 16.

Huh? You're saying there isn't much difference between Lewan and Martin. And that you'd like Martin at 16, but there is almost zero chance Lewan would make it there?
Almost sounds like there is a clear difference between the two...
![]()
There is almost zero chance Lewan drops to 16.
Someone we like will be there.
We might "like" Shazier. Good with that? Okay.
I meant someone who we on this board generally like.
I have no idea what our fucked up front office will do.
Dunno, my list is getting kind of short.
Donald - Gone
Barr - Okay, but iffy a little, probably gone
Martin - Yes, but probably gone
Beckham - Yes, but almost certain to be gone
Manziel - Yes, almost certain to be gone, but Jerry says no anyways even if
Shazier - Iffy, getting more skeptical instead of less
Clinton-Dix - Not impressed, basically neutral
Pryor - Same as above
Jernigan - Dunno if value due to drug thing
Ealy - No effin' way