2013 College Football chatter....

Status
Not open for further replies.
Garrett actually probably would be a really good college coach.
 
I don't know about that...generally they are a little rah rah...he is far from that.
 
EZ22 said:
Garrett actually probably would be a really good college coach.
Click to expand...

I think he'd be good except I don't see him as a good recruiter. Maybe in Texas where he can flash a Super Bowl Ring and talk about the old days sucking off Troy in the shower.
 
Plan9Misfit said:
Woodson was an excellent Heisman winner. The others on your list? Not so much. But Woodson was exceptional at Michigan and was the reason why we went undefeated in 1997 and was one of the reasons why we won the National Championship that season.
Click to expand...

Never should've won over Peyton Manning though. But I know ESPN pushed for Woodson most of the year.
 
I have been occupied this evening. Has the Hiesman winner been named?
 
EZ22 said:
Garrett actually probably would be a really good college coach.
Click to expand...
I think he'd be better off at the high school level, sure he'll probably get outcoached his first few games but he should be ok after that.
 
Clay_Allison said:
I think he'd be good except I don't see him as a good recruiter. Maybe in Texas where he can flash a Super Bowl Ring and talk about the old days sucking off Troy in the shower.
Click to expand...

How hard is it when you have the pick of about 80% of any kid that you want in Texas? Let's not predent that recruiting to Texas is a challenge.
 
VA Cowboy said:
Never should've won over Peyton Manning though. But I know ESPN pushed for Woodson most of the year.
Click to expand...

Why would you say that? Woodson helped Michigan to an undefeated season where Manning had his ass handed to him by Florida for the fourth consecutive year. Plus, Woodson was the first player in NCAA history to score a TD on all three sides of the ball in the same season AND almost single-handedly beat Ohio State. Peyton Manning was great at Tennessee, but Woodson was better at Michigan that year. Both were outstanding candidates, but it's hard to go against a defensive player who was as dominant as Woodson was as well as having him be a player who played offense, defense, and special teams.
 
Last edited:
Iamtdg said:
Jameis Winston.
Click to expand...

birdemic2_zpsea8286d1.gif
 
skidadl said:
How hard is it when you have the pick of about 80% of any kid that you want in Texas? Let's not predent that recruiting to Texas is a challenge.
Click to expand...

I said "in Texas" as in the state as a whole. I know that the UT job is trending but if I'd meant just UT I'd have said "at Texas".

On the other hand, no one being recruited right now was born when Dallas won the SB last.
 
 
Iamtdg said:
Click to expand...

That would be a weird hire.
 
Why won't anyone give Jim Tressel another shot? He looked the other way on some tattoos. It's not like he's radioactive.
 
Clay_Allison said:
Why won't anyone give Jim Tressel another shot? He looked the other way on some tattoos. It's not like he's radioactive.
Click to expand...
Because he's only 2 years in on a 5 year show cause penalty from the NCAA. Any school that hires him faces stiff penalties.

considering most coaches who get in trouble for recruiting violations only get 1 year of a show cause penalty, his 5 years does make him radioactive.
 
Deuce said:
Because he's only 2 years in on a 5 year show cause penalty from the NCAA. Any school that hires him faces stiff penalties.

considering most coaches who get in trouble for recruiting violations only get 1 year of a show cause penalty, his 5 years does make him radioactive.
Click to expand...
That's a pretty ridiculous penalty.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom