L.T. Fan
I'm Easy If You Are
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 21,703
Oh really? Cherry picking? Parity is Cherry picking.That's cherry picking which I've been told by the Romo crowd is wrong.
Oh really? Cherry picking? Parity is Cherry picking.That's cherry picking which I've been told by the Romo crowd is wrong.
What do you mean parity? Picking Romo's best season to compare it to another players average career numbers would be cherry picking. Just like picking and choosing Romo's worst games and using them as examples as to why he isn't great.Oh really? Cherry picking? Parity is Cherry picking.
Dak only has one season. He has nothing to average. I don't know what you mean by that. His only Year happens to be his best year so parity would be Romo's best year. To average Romo's years would not produce parity in this circumstance.What do you mean parity? Picking Romo's best season to compare it to another players average career numbers would be cherry picking. Just like picking and choosing Romo's worst games and using them as examples as to why he isn't great.
Just because Dak won it, doesn't mean Romo wouldn't have won it, either. THREAD BACK UP!!!Good, then I will take great joy in shutting this stupid ass thread down when we win the Lombardi.
Ah, so by all rights Belichick should have "averaged" Bledsoe for "parity".
Like uh, Romo would have one it betterererer. And stuff.Just because Dak won it, doesn't mean Romo wouldn't have won it, either. THREAD BACK UP!!!
Revival!!!Just because Dak won it, doesn't mean Romo wouldn't have won it, either. THREAD BACK UP!!!
His only Year happens to be his best year so parity would be Romo's best year. To average Romo's years would not produce parity in this circumstance.
Precisely why you can't average them. Averaging is done with a group of numbers. There is only one number (season) here, therefore averaging is not possible. It is a static figure. Or a representive number.
It's also Dak's worst year. So should we compare that to Romo's worst? See how you're not making much sense?
A group of games can be averaged... But you can't cherry pick the games so you take all of the players games to get an average instead of just their best or worst season.Precisely why you can't average them. Averaging is done with a group of numbers. There is only one number (season) here, therefore averaging is not possible. It is a static figure. Or a representive number.
You're stretching. We are talking seasons.A group of games can be averaged... But you can't cherry pick the games so you take all of the players games to get an average instead of just their best or worst season.
Romo's back cost this team top seed in 2014. We had that, we go to the Superbowl and probably beat the Patriots.So we are going to win it like we did in 2014 with Romo? Well, guess what, we didn't then either.
This has been an "80-percent" offense. The kind that when run right, beats most teams in the league.The coaches are going to go with what gives them the best chance to win, right now.
Still struggling to see how people extrapolate what Romo did in previous years when healthy, to this team, right now.
Right now, this is not a Romo offense. And it has not been all season long.
No we started by talking about careers. You decided that you wanted to cherry pick just Romo's best season to compare.You're stretching. We are talking seasons.
It's ironic that Dak is beginning his career with the best supporting cast Romo has ever had.No we started by talking about careers. You decided that you wanted to cherry pick just Romo's best season to compare.
It's also Dak's worst year. So should we compare that to Romo's worst? See how you're not making much sense?
Precisely why you can't average them. Averaging is done with a group of numbers. There is only one number (season) here, therefore averaging is not possible. It is a static figure. Or a representive number.
I don't think you nor Alanis Morissette know what ironic means.It's ironic that Dak is beginning his career with the best supporting cast Romo has ever had.
You might want to check post #185 and see who started the averaging dialogue.No we started by talking about careers. You decided that you wanted to cherry pick just Romo's best season to compare.
It says clearly there, career.You might want to check post #185 and see who started the averaging dialogue.
Or maybe Dak is the reason the supporting cast looks good. 2014 was a better supporting cast on offense.It's ironic that Dak is beginning his career with the best supporting cast Romo has ever had.