They didn't trade for him.Gotcha but you thought enough of the guy to trade for him, get him in there.
Disagree. Who didnt know it was going to be a run there? TE release would have been an easy first down.Play call was fine. Wrong RB.
I don't think they prepared for it.Cowboys need to figure out this I formation
Oh, I agree. I think Michael should be active instead of McFadden. Just can't carry 4.Gotcha but you thought enough of the guy to trade for him, get him in there.
I agree. Randle and McFadden are pretty similar runners, Michael would bring a different element to the run game.With the way Randle is running today, and the way Dunbar is playing in the passing game, there's not too much reason to keep McFadden active. Michael would bring a lot more to the table in the short yardage game.
2 punts, 0 flags.Beasley is running just to not fumble it.
I've been saying it for awhile, I don't see the benefit of McFadden. Randle is the better runner and Dunbar is the better receiver.I agree. Randle and McFadden are pretty similar runners, Michael would bring a different element to the run game.