data
Forbes #1
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 50,488
I thought the exact same thing.I can hear that annoying woman yelling Greg Hardy's name. Isn't she like 100 now?
I thought the exact same thing.I can hear that annoying woman yelling Greg Hardy's name. Isn't she like 100 now?
He even looks ashamed of himself. I guess he is still upset over Murray?
My heroes are dead
If Beasley can break out of his niche and actually become a real WR, this whole offense transforms.Beasley has looked great in what I've seen. He may be in for a big year. Expect a lot of 3 receiver, 1 TE sets this year.
I saw a couple tweets yesterday mentioning him lining up outside with Dez moving inside so sounds like they're going to at least give him a chance thereIf Beasley can break out of his niche and actually become a real WR, this whole offense transforms.
I don't think he needs to break out of a niche. I think he's going to see a shit ton of passes from Romo out of our 3 WR packages. What is obvious from the practices I saw is that Romo really likes the guy. I wouldn't be surprised if his numbers aren't right there with Terrance Williams next year. To be fair Beasley basically caught everything Romo threw at him too. For such a midget WR he has pretty damn good hands. Tiny hands, but good anyway.If Beasley can break out of his niche and actually become a real WR, this whole offense transforms.
Agreed.Why is Beasleys niche considered a bad thing? He is very good at what he does and who is to say the guy that replaces his role can do it as well. Between him and Witten it's almost a given first down whenever Romo needs it and usually more.
Our offense transformed when they dedicated itself to running the ball.
If that were true they should have defeated the Packers.Between him and Witten it's almost a given first down whenever Romo needs it and usually more.
If he's getting the 20 yards anyway WGAS where he catches the ball. We have Bryant and Williams to stretch the defense.If that were true they should have defeated the Packers.
I got fired up when Beasley broke to the corner to score in response to Romo's improvised rollout in Chicago. Then it never happened again.
The less you can do, the easier you make it for the better defenses to shut you down when it counts. If you don't threaten a defense deep, you put less pressure on their LBs and DBs.
If Beasley gets more than 15 yards on a play it's because he somehow broke free in the middle. Why can't he actually catch a 20 yard pass?
He was open on the "Not a Catch" play. When is he exactly not open?If that were true they should have defeated the Packers.
I got fired up when Beasley broke to the corner to score in response to Romo's improvised rollout in Chicago. Then it never happened again.
The less you can do, the easier you make it for the better defenses to shut you down when it counts. If you don't threaten a defense deep, you put less pressure on their LBs and DBs.
If Beasley gets more than 15 yards on a play it's because he somehow broke free in the middle. Why can't he actually catch a 20 yard pass?
BOOM and I love it.Our offense transformed when they dedicated itself to running the ball.