The Cowboys’ Biggest Problem Isn’t the Receivers—It’s Dak

p1_

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 10, 2013
Messages
26,707
The Cowboys’ Biggest Problem Isn’t the Receivers—It’s Dak

For months the Cowboys’ receivers have listened to how they’re not talented enough to carry the Dallas offense. But after the first game of the season, the issue might not be the receivers.

By Jonathan Jones September 12, 2018

All offseason the Cowboys wanted you to believe the team had enough talented pass-catchers for Dak Prescott to successfully run the offense without Jason Witten (who retired) and Dez Bryant (who was cut). Almost defiantly the franchise didn’t sign a player of Bryant’s or Witten’s caliber, choosing to put their faith in a wideout group that includes Cole Beasley, Michael Gallup, Deonte Thompson and Allen Hurns.

But after limping out of Charlotte having scored only eight points, Dallas’s first game of the season raises other questions. One game does not a sample size make, but perhaps the question isn’t whether Prescott has enough around him, but rather, can he get the ball to the guys he has?

On Sunday Prescott picked up right where he left off in his sophomore slump of 2017. Short and low to Hurns on third-and-11. Short and low to a wide-open Blake Jarwin on third-and-seven. Not seeing an even more wide-open Beasley downfield early in the third quarter. Behind Gallup on a shallow cross in the fourth quarter.

Prescott didn’t get his team across midfield until the third quarter and only began looking like an accurate passer early in the fourth quarter. He should have been able to find some completions in Carolina’s zone coverage, but he went just 3-of-10 on throws that traveled at least 10 yards downfield. For the seventh time in his past 11 games, the third-year quarterback failed to throw a touchdown.

“I was off,” Prescott admitted shortly after the 16–8 loss. “That stuff you have to go back and look on film. I have to figure out why I was off. Was I rushing it? Did I feel pressure? What were the things that were causing it? Was it just me missing the pass. That’s not anything that I can judge right now.”

Credit Prescott for taking ownership of the issues, just as he did this summer when discussing what went wrong last year. He played poorly in a game where offensive coordinator Scott Linehan seemed to lack creativity in his play-calling. Dallas never got the run-game established against Carolina’s defense. The Panthers’ front seven could handle the run alone but would sometimes bring in an eighth defender into the box. Ezekiel Elliott could only get 15 carries for 69 yards.

“Every week they’re going to load the box,” Elliott said. “If they don’t then they’re going to pay. So I mean, there’s no point in even talking about it anymore. We know they’re going to load the box. They know we like to run the ball.”

For four months, the Cowboys’ proud group of receivers heard that they’re the football equivalent of trash, and a couple of them pushed back against that very notion after the game. I asked Gallup, a rookie, whether this game helped the narrative that Prescott doesn’t have many targets to throw to.

“I wouldn’t say that,” Gallup said. “Most of the game [the wide receivers] stepped up to the call when the ball was in the air and it was a catchable ball, most of the time we were making it. I think we just need to do what we can control.”

When faced with a similar question, Beasley said, “The strength is not in one guy, it’s in the group. That’s what a lot of people won’t understand but that’s fine. We don’t need people to understand. We’re going to come out and put it on film. If you watch film you’ll come out and see guys open. That’s what we bring to the table and we’ve just got to continue to do that every game.”

As promised the Cowboys had a healthy rotation at receiver—of the 64 offensive snaps, Beasley played on 43, followed by Hurns’s 38, Thompson’s 30, Gallup’s 29 and Terrence Williams’s 19. Beasley led all receivers with seven catches on eight targets for 73 yards while no one else got more than three catches and 30 yards. Tavon Austin saw just 10 snaps, and he got one rush for one yard.

Off the field, former Dallas wideouts were drawing attention to themselves in other ways. Bryant was trolling the Cowboys on Twitter, tweeting about what the Patriots’ offense would look like with him in it, and Witten was in Oakland, preparing for his debut as an analyst on Monday Night Football the following day.

But Prescott couldn’t worry about them; he was concerned with his group of receivers.

“We are not talking about guys that we used to have or guys that were missing, it’s about the guys that were on that field tonight and we gave it our all,” Prescott said. “I promise that we will do it again next Sunday and put a better performance out there.”

And there should be some concern for Prescott, as well.
 

Rev

Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
19,712
I was going to mention the lack of talent but remembered the open recievers and badly thrown balls.
 

Couchcoach

DCC 4Life
Joined
Dec 26, 2017
Messages
2,987
Yes, they know defenses will be loading the box week after week. With a real QB that would open the passing game and defenses would pay dearly
But, you know...
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
53,253
The Cowboys’ Biggest Problem Isn’t the Receivers—It’s Dak

For months the Cowboys’ receivers have listened to how they’re not talented enough to carry the Dallas offense. But after the first game of the season, the issue might not be the receivers.

By Jonathan Jones September 12, 2018

All offseason the Cowboys wanted you to believe the team had enough talented pass-catchers for Dak Prescott to successfully run the offense without Jason Witten (who retired) and Dez Bryant (who was cut). Almost defiantly the franchise didn’t sign a player of Bryant’s or Witten’s caliber, choosing to put their faith in a wideout group that includes Cole Beasley, Michael Gallup, Deonte Thompson and Allen Hurns.

But after limping out of Charlotte having scored only eight points, Dallas’s first game of the season raises other questions. One game does not a sample size make, but perhaps the question isn’t whether Prescott has enough around him, but rather, can he get the ball to the guys he has?

On Sunday Prescott picked up right where he left off in his sophomore slump of 2017. Short and low to Hurns on third-and-11. Short and low to a wide-open Blake Jarwin on third-and-seven. Not seeing an even more wide-open Beasley downfield early in the third quarter. Behind Gallup on a shallow cross in the fourth quarter.

Prescott didn’t get his team across midfield until the third quarter and only began looking like an accurate passer early in the fourth quarter. He should have been able to find some completions in Carolina’s zone coverage, but he went just 3-of-10 on throws that traveled at least 10 yards downfield. For the seventh time in his past 11 games, the third-year quarterback failed to throw a touchdown.

“I was off,” Prescott admitted shortly after the 16–8 loss. “That stuff you have to go back and look on film. I have to figure out why I was off. Was I rushing it? Did I feel pressure? What were the things that were causing it? Was it just me missing the pass. That’s not anything that I can judge right now.”

Credit Prescott for taking ownership of the issues, just as he did this summer when discussing what went wrong last year. He played poorly in a game where offensive coordinator Scott Linehan seemed to lack creativity in his play-calling. Dallas never got the run-game established against Carolina’s defense. The Panthers’ front seven could handle the run alone but would sometimes bring in an eighth defender into the box. Ezekiel Elliott could only get 15 carries for 69 yards.

“Every week they’re going to load the box,” Elliott said. “If they don’t then they’re going to pay. So I mean, there’s no point in even talking about it anymore. We know they’re going to load the box. They know we like to run the ball.”

For four months, the Cowboys’ proud group of receivers heard that they’re the football equivalent of trash, and a couple of them pushed back against that very notion after the game. I asked Gallup, a rookie, whether this game helped the narrative that Prescott doesn’t have many targets to throw to.

“I wouldn’t say that,” Gallup said. “Most of the game [the wide receivers] stepped up to the call when the ball was in the air and it was a catchable ball, most of the time we were making it. I think we just need to do what we can control.”

When faced with a similar question, Beasley said, “The strength is not in one guy, it’s in the group. That’s what a lot of people won’t understand but that’s fine. We don’t need people to understand. We’re going to come out and put it on film. If you watch film you’ll come out and see guys open. That’s what we bring to the table and we’ve just got to continue to do that every game.”

As promised the Cowboys had a healthy rotation at receiver—of the 64 offensive snaps, Beasley played on 43, followed by Hurns’s 38, Thompson’s 30, Gallup’s 29 and Terrence Williams’s 19. Beasley led all receivers with seven catches on eight targets for 73 yards while no one else got more than three catches and 30 yards. Tavon Austin saw just 10 snaps, and he got one rush for one yard.

Off the field, former Dallas wideouts were drawing attention to themselves in other ways. Bryant was trolling the Cowboys on Twitter, tweeting about what the Patriots’ offense would look like with him in it, and Witten was in Oakland, preparing for his debut as an analyst on Monday Night Football the following day.

But Prescott couldn’t worry about them; he was concerned with his group of receivers.

“We are not talking about guys that we used to have or guys that were missing, it’s about the guys that were on that field tonight and we gave it our all,” Prescott said. “I promise that we will do it again next Sunday and put a better performance out there.”

And there should be some concern for Prescott, as well.
Yeah there is plenty of blame to go around but I'm not sure I'd really put it on the receivers. The O-line sucked, Dak sucked and the play calling sucked. I don't think the play calling did our receivers any favors but they can only run the routes they are told to run. The worst you can say about the receivers is that none of them really stepped up and made the difficult catch. But there weren't many opportunities for even that.
 

p1_

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 10, 2013
Messages
26,707
I think Bease played better than he has in a while. He had a nice game, at least.
 

BipolarFuk

Demoted
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
11,464
People were open. Dak couldn't hit a fucking barn door.

I'd bet if someone sat down and watched the all-22 or whatever it is called, you would see plenty of open receivers.
 

DLK150

DCC 4Life
Joined
May 16, 2014
Messages
8,789
Dak caught lightning in a bottle his rookie year but it's been all downhill ever since.
 

jsmith6919

Honored Member - RIP
Joined
Aug 26, 2013
Messages
28,407
Dak caught lightning in a bottle his rookie year but it's been all downhill ever since.
Everything was simplified for him that year and they actually had some creativity calling rollouts,etc.

Dak is not a cerebral qb like Romo and never will be, they need to get back to what works
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
53,253
Everything was simplified for him that year and they actually had some creativity calling rollouts,etc.

Dak is not a cerebral qb like Romo and never will be, they need to get back to what works
I don't think we are doing anything that complex even now. 2 man receiver routes aren't complex. The problem is when our O-line isn't blocking and those 2 WR's don't get open there is nothing.
 

jsmith6919

Honored Member - RIP
Joined
Aug 26, 2013
Messages
28,407
I don't think we are doing anything that complex even now. 2 man receiver routes aren't complex. The problem is when our O-line isn't blocking and those 2 WR's don't get open there is nothing.
Even giving Dak the rpo option seems to be fucking him up, also not sure but wasn't Frederick calling the OL protection? Is Dak doing that now or Looney?
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
53,253
Even giving Dak the rpo option seems to be fucking him up, also not sure but wasn't Frederick calling the OL protection? Is Dak doing that now or Looney?
Martin looked like he was during the game. I saw him pointing stuff out on the offensive line.

The RPOs look good. We just hand off way too much. We don't run many RPOs though. Most of them are just read options. And I can't remember Dak keeping a single one of them against the Panthers. Which either means the Panthers were playing it perfectly or Dak was playing scared.
 

jsmith6919

Honored Member - RIP
Joined
Aug 26, 2013
Messages
28,407
Martin looked like he was during the game. I saw him pointing stuff out on the offensive line.

The RPOs look good. We just hand off way too much. We don't run many RPOs though. Most of them are just read options. And I can't remember Dak keeping a single one of them against the Panthers. Which either means the Panthers were playing it perfectly or Dak was playing scared.
I think he kept one but I was pretty drunk from the 2nd quarter on, but yea def agree Dak needs to keep a lot more of those. That's one of the things that made 13-3 possible, I don't know if they are coaching him to run as a last resort or if he's got the yips but he has to get back to it
 

ravidubey

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
20,248
Dak caught lightning in a bottle his rookie year but it's been all downhill ever since.
That was obvious to some, but don’t worry because Jerry has assured us we’re going to see a QB somewhere between Goff and Newton.

Rest assured.
 

DLK150

DCC 4Life
Joined
May 16, 2014
Messages
8,789
That was obvious to some, but don’t worry because Jerry has assured us we’re going to see a QB somewhere between Goff and Newton.

Rest assured.
Thank you, that gives me some level of relief...

/heavy sarcasm
 
Top Bottom