Fair enough. My point was that guys like Rivers or Roethlisberger have come up and been successful without necessarily performing at a HOF level. Luck has been touted as the next big thing since college, and has played well, but I feel like there's this silent assumption that he is definitely going to have an all time great career even though accomplishments haven't yet indicated he'll be better than a Bledsoe, Rivers, or Romo.Just don't see the Rivers comparison at all. In style of play he is much more like Elway and Big Ben.
They are different. Luck has a stronger arm and can run. If I had to match a physical prototype for an all-timer Aaron Rodgers is first and Luck is second.I always take the younger, more fit player when the "talent" is pretty equal.
I even think Luck more talented, just not as seasoned.
It's pretty impressive considering the talent surrounding him too. I mean that Colts defense was crap this year. Their O-line was pathetic. Not much at RB.He's great now. First 3 years in the NFL, playoffs, AFCC in 3rd year...pretty easy to see what his next step is.
Maybe, maybe not. Marino made it his rookie year and then never made it back so you can't predict based on history. Just like next year while we all expect good things from the boys, it's starting all over again.He's great now. First 3 years in the NFL, playoffs, AFCC in 3rd year...pretty easy to see what his next step is.
His division has been down in each of those years, too. That won't last for long.He's great now. First 3 years in the NFL, playoffs, AFCC in 3rd year...pretty easy to see what his next step is.
I'll go ahead and say he is a great player now and will get better. You can play the wait and see game.Maybe, maybe not. Marino made it his rookie year and then never made it back so you can't predict based on history. Just like next year while we all expect good things from the boys, it's starting all over again.
His division has been down, so has Brady's division...does that minimize his accomplishments?His division has been down in each of those years, too. That won't last for long.
Luck's offense using him the way they have has been a shortcut to success in much the way Dallas used Romo for all those years without a defense or a running game.
To really break through, Luck will need to mentally lock away his past experience and start fresh with a solid running game and some building blocks on defense. Then when they achieve some semblance of balance, unleash the passing attack.
If they continue to go full-on Peyton Manning, I foresee a lot of frustrating "almost" seasons for Luck and the Colts.
Did it minimize Montana or Young's?His division has been down, so has Brady's division...does that minimize his accomplishments?
I absolutely agree he is a potential monster talent. My point was it isn't a given he and his teams will take the next step to the SB win or lose.I'll go ahead and say he is a great player now and will get better. You can play the wait and see game.
Montana and Young had a guaranteed joke of a schedule for most of their careers. "Same old Rams" was a fricking mantra. Dallas had the Cardinals, but even they had Otis Anderson, Neil Lomax, Roy Green, and Eric Swann for stretches.Did it minimize Montana or Young's?
They played in an even weaker NFC West back in those days. The Patriots at least had some competition from the Jets for a few seasons where they made a couple of AFC Championships.
That's all nice, but the fact still remains that is it pretty damn stupid and petty to deny giving credit to a team or individual because of their division foes?Montana and Young had a guaranteed joke of a schedule for most of their careers. "Same old Rams" was a fricking mantra. Dallas had the Cardinals, but even they had Otis Anderson, Neil Lomax, Roy Green, and Eric Swann for stretches.
The 49ers had the Saints (0 playoff victories in their franchise history until Brees), the Falcons (almost as futile), and Rams (crap awful outside of 1978-1981 and 1989-1990). On top of it, they got to play the worst from either the NFC East or NFC Central which inevitably was the Cardinals and Buccaneers.
The Buccaneers alone probably gave the 49ers more playoff berths than any other team.
Brady has had plain ridiculous luck against the Dolphins, Bills, and Jets. There have been way too many seasons where all three have been plain bad. When does that happen for Dallas vs the NFC East? 1998? Maybe once or twice in the 1970's?
The Cowboys of the 1990s beat former Superbowl champions and a team so physical in the Eagles there may never be another like that again thanks to free agency. Now that's a champion worth recognizing.
No, it's true great "dynasties" often are backed by weak schedules.That's all nice, but the fact still remains that is it pretty damn stupid and petty to deny giving credit to a team or individual because of their division foes?
Were the Cowboys of the 1970s any less when we didn't exactly have powerhouses in the Eagles, the Giants and the Cardinals in the division? The Cardinals were good maybe twice in the decade. Otherwise we had the Redskins and they weren't always top shelf.
True. Like Peyton Manning. Worst playoff QB in history.There are a ton of players to question or call out. Luck is not one. He is a great QB in an era that its going to be harder to find one.