- Joined
- Apr 8, 2013
- Messages
- 15,873
Go COWBOYS!Get another team.
Go COWBOYS!Get another team.
Get another team.
Well the 49ers came within about 3 yards of winning it all last year and were an OT away from being in the Super Bowl the year before that, so I guess that's something.I think a lot of people are living in the past, name one superbowl winner in the last 6 years that has a dominant o-line.
Outside of San Fran I don't think any playoff teams over that stretch has used that many premium resources on the O-line.
I guess if its hands down BPA you have to consider it but there are just to many holes on defense to use a 1st on an o-lineman especially considering zone blocking types can be found later in the draft.
Yep. It performed well down the stretch, but there is little depth and the chances of one of Bernardeau, Leary, or Free falling off is not insignificant.Well the 49ers came within about 3 yards of winning it all last year and were an OT away from being in the Super Bowl the year before that, so I guess that's something.
Generally speaking I agree with you but if the BPA is an OG or RT, it isn't particularly close and I don't like any of my trade down scenarios, I'd have no problem spending a 3rd 1st on the OL.
Bad as it is you could argue there's room for growth with Wilcox and Church. A need, but not breaking our back.Yep. Safety is a huge need as well.
Unger was 2nd, and I would have no issue using a 2nd and the rest of that line is middle to low draft picks.Seahawks used high picks in Okung, Carpenter, Unger.
San Fran is the outlier but like I said if its hands down BPA I could go for it but with the other holes we have I can't see that being the case.Well the 49ers came within about 3 yards of winning it all last year and were an OT away from being in the Super Bowl the year before that, so I guess that's something.
Generally speaking I agree with you but if the BPA is an OG or RT, it isn't particularly close and I don't like any of my trade down scenarios, I'd have no problem spending a 3rd 1st on the OL.
I don't think so. The guy MAY be a decent rotation guy. Not a starter on a championship caliber defense.I think Selvie is a guy you could live with at LE if Ware hadn't went all relic on us.
You can't point to anything other than the DL that's a hands-down greater need. So unless we're locking into one position group, then that means OL should be on the table.San Fran is the outlier but like I said if its hands down BPA I could go for it but with the other holes we have I can't see that being the case.
With the position we are cap wise and defensively its not wise drafting to be using a 1st in case people fall off at this point Free is a average RT and is in his prime, yes I would bring in competition for Berny but that's later in the draft.
You lose your shit all the time around draft day.If we draft a WR or RB high I may lose my shit, especially if there is DL talent on the board. WR I can maybe see if it's BPA, but no on the RB. We can find a serviceable guy later.
Unfortunately, you're right.You lose your shit all the time around draft day.
Sure he is. He basically put up Greg Ellis like production at LE without the pussy attitude. The problem is he needs an elite pass rusher opposite him and Ware was not an elite pass rusher this year.I don't think so. The guy MAY be a decent rotation guy. Not a starter on a championship caliber defense.