- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 60,164
If she was still a Democrat I'd consider voting for her. I think she is a legit person.Wait, they put Tulsi Gabbard on a terrorist watchlist?
If she was still a Democrat I'd consider voting for her. I think she is a legit person.Wait, they put Tulsi Gabbard on a terrorist watchlist?
I agree. Plus she does not annoy me.If she was still a Democrat I'd consider voting for her. I think she is a legit person.
Minnesota is such a fucked up state politically. How they keep voting in people like her and Walz just boggles the mind.
This is unfortunate.
I guess the rural vote is not getting out.Minnesota is such a fucked up state politically. How they keep voting in people like her and Walz just boggles the mind.
According to my uncle who lives outside the cities, they have good state voter turnout but the population of Minneapolis/St. Paul continually decides elections for the rest of the state.I guess the rural vote is not getting out.
Still seems crazy to me. Just doesn't seem like a place the Liberals would flock to.According to my uncle who lives outside the cities, they have good state voter turnout but the population of Minneapolis/St. Paul continually decides elections for the rest of the state.
Might want to check what Obama did in his time sending people there.Still seems crazy to me. Just doesn't seem like a place the Liberals would flock to.
Weird how that always happens.but the population of Minneapolis/St. Paul continually decides elections for the rest of the state.
There is a reason for the electoral college. Our forefathers were brilliant to have been so young at the time.Weird how that always happens.
It's absolutely false.If you've seen the movie, that's demonstrably false.
This one for sure.This one or Boeberts.
Choose.
I'm thinking it's definite now.
With the tats?This is actually pulling Boebert even for me.