Carl
RIP Brother
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 1,372
Yes, I like arguing with myself. It's fun.Are you asking yourself in hopes of convincing yourself that timeouts are necessary?
Yes, I like arguing with myself. It's fun.Are you asking yourself in hopes of convincing yourself that timeouts are necessary?
That is one of the things that stood out to me in the game. It was nice to see.The Raiders are a physical team...we've out physicaled them this half. Happy with the line.
So now we are going to finish 1-3? This team is playing as good as it has all year.Eagles are a lot less predictable than we are. As crazy as all our games are, we beat losers and lose to winners with amazing consistency. Eagles you never know what you're gonna get and who they'll beat and who they'll lose to. However, here are their remaining games:
Cardinals - LOSS (zona is simply a better team) 6-6
Lions - LOSS, 6-7
Vikings - WIN, 7-7
Bears - LOSS, 7-8
Cowboys - WIN 8-8
Meanwhile, here's us:
Bears - LOSS 7-6 (the Bears are better and Romo is always confused by their scheme)
Packers - LOSS 7-7 (I know the Packers are a losing team but once Rogers gets back they will likely turn it around)
Redskins - WIN 8-7
Eagles - LOSS 8-8 (we actually make the playoffs in this scenario because we would be 5-1 in the division and the Eagles 4-2. If it falls this way, we might pack this game in and run out Orton to avoid injuries going into the post-season)
The Bears have a pretty porous run D...I certainly hope we emphasize it. Screen game was great too.
The Eagles haven't beaten a team above .500 all season so up to this point they've actually been pretty predictable.Eagles are a lot less predictable than we are. As crazy as all our games are, we beat losers and lose to winners with amazing consistency. Eagles you never know what you're gonna get and who they'll beat and who they'll lose to. However, here are their remaining games:
Cardinals - LOSS (zona is simply a better team) 6-6
Lions - LOSS, 6-7
Vikings - WIN, 7-7
Bears - LOSS, 7-8
Cowboys - WIN 8-8
)
And those throws to the backs are uber-Romo-friendly (provided JPP/Rob Jackson are not playing).We have 3 backs that are good at running screens. It really should be a staple of our offense. Hopefully we emphasize it more going forward.
That's a good point too. Give pass rushers a reason to not go full bore all the time.And those throws to the backs are uber-Romo-friendly (provided JPP/Rob Jackson are not playing).
Noted. But goes without saying. Gotta respect the streak.As an aside, Jester is pretty much on the hook to start the gameday threads until the badness happens.
It was more bearable when it had Woody instead of Stephen A., but it was still bad.ESPN First Take is not a bad show, conceptually.
But they couldn't come up with two bigger idiots to populate the show with.
Stephen Nay uses the race card way too much. I don't agree with almost anything he says because of that.It was more bearable when it had Woody instead of Stephen A., but it was still bad.
Woody would be better, but he's terrible too.It was more bearable when it had Woody instead of Stephen A., but it was still bad.