- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 122,861
I agree. Getting colder on Ridley the more I watch him.Better that than any of the glorified #2 WRs in this draft.
I agree. Getting colder on Ridley the more I watch him.Better that than any of the glorified #2 WRs in this draft.
I really don't like the value at 19 for any of these.Ugh, I really hope we aren't seriously considering Evans. He might be my least favorite of the possible first rounders.
Evans is in a pretty big group of guys that I'm lukewarm on at 19 but would be very pleased with if we traded back about 8-10 or so spots.I don't see him as inside the top 20 players in this draft either.
Does colder mean that you don't want him at 19 or that you aren't gung-ho on him there?I agree. Getting colder on Ridley the more I watch him.
I'm totally good with the value of Ridley or Hernandez at 19. I think they would both be excellent picks there and two guys who I could see putting up numbers in Dallas to justify it (For Hernandez I think he is an elite level run blocker in the NFL). But after that sort of group I'm probably trying to trade down.I really don't like the value at 19 for any of these.
If we can't get Vea, James, Smith, I want a receiver. I really like DJ Moore. He's faster and tougher. But Ridley has terrific hands, can high point a bit, and plays fast as hell. His route running is sick. My only worry for him is his slight frame.I agree. Getting colder on Ridley the more I watch him.
I only worry about his hands. They just don't look very strong to me.If we are going WR I am cooling on Ridley as well. DJ Chark is a guy I really like at WR.
From what I saw he seemed aggressive to the ball...more so I was impressed with how he seems to glide with the ball in his hands.I only worry about his hands. They just don't look very strong to me.
Yeah and there is no denying his size and speed is exciting. I just see too many basket catches and body catches for my taste.From what I saw he seemed aggressive to the ball...more so I was impressed with how he seems to glide with the ball in his hands.
I am just not that convinced he is going to be a difference making WR, at least enough to draft him at that stage.Does colder mean that you don't want him at 19 or that you aren't gung-ho on him there?
I've never been a huge Ridley fan to the point that he'd be my auto-pick if available or that I'd advocate trading up, but he's a high floor type who should be an excellent number 2, so he'd be a decent enough pick there at 19.
Yea, I mean I've always been lukewarm on him so I agree, wouldn't be especially thrilled with the pick but wouldn't be disappointed either.I am just not that convinced he is going to be a difference making WR, at least enough to draft him at that stage.
No thank you.Supposedly Vander Esch is an official visit.
I think he needs to be a consideration at 19, dude is 6-4, 250+ with nearly 34 inch arms, ran a 4.65 40 with a 39.5 vertical.
He has some rough edges as far as his technique taking on blocks and his physicality in that regard but I think that's mostly lack of experience. If he can clean up some of that he has Pro Bowl potential with a rare blend of size/speed and instincts to find the ball in traffic, as well as good coverage ability and some added value as a blitzer.
Why?No thank you.
You can start with this.Why?
I know that you know making those types of comparisons are literally pointless, especially from some fucking Joe Fan like this chud.You can start with this.
From what I have seen, he has some serious issues separating from blocks. I have also seen a few plays where he has taken terrible angle in pursuit. Just not a big fan of the idea of taking him at 19.Why?