President Trump Thread...

Status
Not open for further replies.

BipolarFuk

Demoted
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
11,464
:lol

Cohen pled guility under oath to charges of campaign finance crimes committed at Trump's order.

What do you want? For me to submit a FOIA request to the NY attorney general for the evidence so you can see it?
You'll have to try to explain it to him in one syllable words.

He loses all brain capacity when it comes to his Dear Leader.
 

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,874
:lol

Cohen pled guility under oath to charges of campaign finance crimes committed at Trump's order.

What do you want? For me to submit a FOIA request to the NY attorney general for the evidence so you can see it?
I agree that he plead guilty but I am waiting to see what the evidence is that Trump directed or ordered him to commit crimes. I don’t question his plea only whether it is to get a deal or if he is saying he can implicate Trump in a crime. If Trump denies it then Cohen will have to produce evidence . That how the law still works as far as I know.
 

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,874
You'll have to try to explain it to him in one syllable words.

He loses all brain capacity when it comes to his Dear Leader.
You obviously don’t know how the law works. Only Cohen has plead guilty. A denial by Trump will put the burden of evidence on Cohen to prove it.
 

BipolarFuk

Demoted
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
11,464
Michael Cohen Says He Arranged Payments to Women at Trump’s Direction

Michael Cohen Says He Arranged Payments to Women at Trump’s Direction

Michael D. Cohen, President Trump’s former fixer, made the extraordinary admission in court on Tuesday that Mr. Trump had directed him to arrange payments to two women during the 2016 campaign to keep them from speaking publicly about affairs they said they had with Mr. Trump.

Mr. Cohen acknowledged the illegal payments while pleading guilty to breaking campaign finance laws and other charges. He told a judge in United States District Court in Manhattan that the payments to the women were made “in coordination with and at the direction of a candidate for federal office.”

“I participated in this conduct, which on my part took place in Manhattan, for the principal purpose of influencing the election” for president in 2016, Mr. Cohen said.

Sign Up For the Morning Briefing Newsletter

Mr. Cohen also pleaded guilty to multiple counts of tax evasion and bank fraud, bringing to a close a monthslong investigation by Manhattan federal prosecutors who examined his personal business dealings and his role in helping to arrange financial deals with women connected to Mr. Trump.

The plea came shortly before another blow to the president: his former campaign manager, Paul Manafort, was convicted in his financial fraud trial in Virginia. The special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, had built a case that Mr. Manafort hid millions of dollars in foreign accounts to evade taxes and lied to banks to obtain $20 million in loans.

The guilty plea and Mr. Cohen’s statements in court represent a pivotal moment in the investigation into the president: a once-loyal aide admitting that he made payments at the behest of Mr. Trump to shield him from politically damaging disclosures.

Mr. Trump’s lawyers have, for months, said privately that they considered Mr. Cohen’s case to be potentially more problematic for the president than the investigation by the special counsel.

But Mr. Trump’s lawyer, Rudolph W. Giuliani, said in a statement after Mr. Cohen’s plea, “There is no allegation of any wrongdoing against the president in the government’s charges against Mr. Cohen.”

In federal court in Manhattan, Mr. Cohen made the admission about Mr. Trump’s role in the payments to the women — an adult film actress and a former Playboy playmate — as he pleaded guilty to two campaign finance crimes.

One of those charges stemmed from a $130,000 payment he made to the actress, Stephanie Clifford, better known as Stormy Daniels, in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election. The other concerned a complicated arrangement in which a tabloid bought the rights to the story about the former Playboy model, Karen McDougal, then killed it.

The plea agreement does not call for Mr. Cohen to cooperate with federal prosecutors in Manhattan. Still, it does not preclude him from providing information to the special counsel, who is examining the Trump campaign’s possible involvement in Russia’s interference in the 2016 campaign. If Mr. Cohen were to substantially assist the special counsel’s investigation, Mr. Mueller could recommend a reduction in his sentence.

Mr. Cohen had been the president’s longtime fixer, handling his most sensitive business and personal matters. He once said he would take a bullet for Mr. Trump.

As Mr. Cohen addressed the judge, admitting to the crimes he had committed, the packed courtroom remained silent. Even when Mr. Cohen made obvious references to Mr. Trump, referring to him as “the candidate” and “a candidate for federal office,” spectators seemed to listen raptly, with no gasps or audible reactions.

Mr. Cohen pleaded guilty to five counts of tax evasion for concealing more than $4 million in personal income from 2012 to 2016 and to one count of bank fraud, for making false statements to a financial institution in connection with a series of loans. He also pleaded guilty to making an excessive campaign contribution and causing an unlawful corporate contribution during the 2016 election cycle.

He will be sentenced on Dec. 12 before Judge William H. Pauley III. Though he faces up to 65 years on all eight counts, the sentencing guidelines suggest he will receive far less time.

The charges against Mr. Cohen were not a surprise, but he had signaled recently he might be willing to cooperate with investigators who for months have been conducting an extensive investigation of his personal business dealings.

Indeed, his guilty plea comes slightly more than a month after he gave an interview to George Stephanopoulos on ABC News and said he would put “his family and country first” if prosecutors offered him leniency in exchange for incriminating information on Mr. Trump.

In July, in what appeared to be another public break with Mr. Trump, one of Mr. Cohen’s lawyers, Lanny J. Davis, released a secret audio recording that Mr. Cohen had made of the president in which it seems that Mr. Trump admits knowledge of a payment made to Ms. McDougal, the model who said she had an affair with him.

As part of their investigation, prosecutors had been looking into whether Mr. Cohen violated any campaign-finance laws by making the $130,000 payment to Ms. Clifford in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

Mr. Cohen’s plea culminates a long-running inquiry that became publicly known in April when F.B.I. agents armed with search warrants raided his office, apartment and hotel room, hauling away reams of documents, including pieces of paper salvaged from a shredder, and millions of electronic files contained on a series of cellphones, iPads and computers.

Lawyers for Mr. Cohen and Mr. Trump spent the next four months working with a court-appointed special master to review the documents and data files to determine whether any of the materials were subject to attorney-client privilege and should not be made available to the government.

The special master, Barbara S. Jones, who completed her review last week, issued a series of reports in recent months, finding that only a fraction of the materials were privileged and the rest could be provided to prosecutors for their investigation.

On Monday, the judge overseeing the review, Kimba M. Wood of Federal District Court in Manhattan, issued an order adopting Ms. Jones’s findings and ending the review process.

It was unclear on Tuesday what role the materials that Ms. Jones reviewed, which were made available to prosecutors on a rolling basis, may have had in the charges against Mr. Cohen.

One collateral effect of Mr. Cohen’s plea agreement is that it may allow Michael Avenatti, Ms. Clifford’s lawyer, to proceed with a deposition of Mr. Trump in a lawsuit that Ms. Clifford filed accusing the president of breaking a nondisclosure agreement concerning their affair.

The lawsuit had been stayed by a judge pending the resolution of Mr. Cohen’s criminal case. Mr. Avenatti wrote on Twitter on Tuesday that he would now seek to force Mr. Trump to testify “under oath about what he knew, when he knew it and what he did about it.”

The bank fraud charge stems from a series of loans Mr. Cohen obtained or sought to obtain between 2010 and 2015.

Mr. Cohen pleaded guilty to making false statements to a bank about his net worth and failing to disclose several different loans, some of which were collateralized by taxi medallions.

One element of the charge relates to a series of loans for more than $20 million made by two financial institutions, Sterling National Bank and the Melrose Credit Union, in 2014.

Publicly filed financing statements showed that the 2014 loans were secured by 32 taxi medallions owned by Mr. Cohen and his family. The medallions were then valued at more than $1 million each, and generated a total of more than $1 million a year in income.

Sixteen separate companies controlled by Mr. Cohen and his family received the loans. Each company owned two taxi medallions. Mr. Cohen and his wife also personally guaranteed the loans, according to the filings.
 

BipolarFuk

Demoted
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
11,464
Manafort’s verdict and Cohen’s plea gave Trump his worst day of the Russia investigation so far

Manafort’s verdict and Cohen’s plea gave Trump his worst day of the Russia investigation so far

In the span of an hour Tuesday, two people close to President Trump in the 2016 campaign who have been ensnared in legal troubles were found guilty in separate courts.

And with that, Trump’s already questionable attacks on the independent Russia investigation into election meddling took an even bigger credibility hit.

Let’s start with a direct challenge to Trump’s version of events during the campaign that Trump appears to have just lost.

Trump originally said he didn’t know about his longtime lawyer and fixer’s efforts to pay off women during the campaign who said they had affairs with the president. Later he said he wasn’t doing anything wrong. That lawyer, Michel Cohen, just pleaded guilty in New York court, saying that he not only paid off those women to help Trump win the election — a potential campaign finance violation — but that he did it “in coordination and at the direction of” Trump.

Subscribe to the Post Most newsletter: Today’s most popular stories on The Washington Post

In other words, Trump maintains that he had nothing to do with anything unsavory or illegal; Cohen just pleaded guilty to doing those things because Trump told him to. Cohen has already released some tapes that appear to back up his version of events. Now he has testified that it happened.

And it’s infinitely harder for Trump to logically claim he’s the one telling the truth when the other person faces jail time for telling a court his version of events.

“This is a disaster for Trump,” said Cornell Law vice dean and legal analyst Jens David Ohlin. “The president is now smack in the middle of a campaign finance violation case. . . . Prosecutors not only have audio recordings of these conversations but will have Cohen’s testimony on top of that. Cohen can both authenticate the tapes and also explain what happened before and after the recordings.”

As The Fix’s Aaron Blake writes, this is the first time in the broader Russia investigation that one of Trump’s allies pleaded guilty to something specific to the 2016 campaign.

But just a half-step back from what went on during the 2016 campaign is more troubling legal news for Trump. On Tuesday, a federal jury in Virginia convicted former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort of eight counts of tax and bank fraud. Jurors were hung on 10 other counts. None of the 18 charges stemmed from activities that happened while Manafort was leading Trump’s campaign in summer 2016.

But at the very least, the Manafort verdict is a massive PR hit for Trump. The head of his campaign at a critical moment during the campaign is now a convicted bank and tax fraud felon. And those convictions resulted from the work of special counsel Robert S. Mueller III and his team, who Trump is desperately trying to disparage and discredit.

Trump has argued that, much like him, Manafort is being treated unfairly by investigators. The broader message is that Mueller’s investigation and related ones are politically motivated maneuvers to get him.

After Tuesday, to continue to argue that, he’ll have to try to discredit not only Mueller but a federal judge and a 12 anonymous jurors who didn’t think the charges were unfair.

After Manafort’s conviction, Trump zeroed in on the fact that Manafort’s convictions didn’t involve his work with Trump or the allegations that the campaign colluded with Russia to win the election. “It doesn’t involve me. … It’s a very sad thing. … This has absolutely nothing to do” with Russian collusion, he told reporters.

But what Trump isn’t acknowledging is that, in many ways, this trial was all about Russian collusion.

Manafort’s brief tenure as the head of Trump’s campaign overlapped with concerns about Russia’s interference in the 2016 election, he’s got high-level connections to Russia in his own right, and he’s a key link to the president as one of the highest-ranking Trump campaign officials ensnared in the investigation.

The more legal pressure there is on Manafort, the more pressure he’ll face from Mueller to sign a plea deal. Any plea deal would probably offer Manafort a reduced jail sentence in exchange for sharing what he knows about Trump and Russia connections.

Manafort’s deputy, Rick Gates, has reached a similar plea deal to cooperate with Mueller. On Tuesday, so did Cohen. Manafort refused, and a jury just convicted him of eight serious charges that Mueller himself brought. None of this looks like a political witch hunt or hoax. It looks like key members of Trump’s inner circle in 2016 are in serious legal trouble, and Trump’s defenses around those people are crumbling.
 

BipolarFuk

Demoted
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
11,464
The worst hour of Donald Trump's presidency just happened

The worst hour of Donald Trump's presidency just happened

Two massive clouds that have been hanging over Donald Trump's presidency for months broke open almost simultaneously on Tuesday afternoon -- and poured rain all over the President.

Between 4 p.m. and 5 p.m. Eastern time, two narratives -- both disastrously bad for Trump -- emerged:
1. Paul Manafort, the man who spent five critical months leading Trump's campaign in 2016, was found guilty of eight financial crimes. On the 10 other charges brought against Manafort, the jury couldn't reach a unanimous conclusion and the presiding judge declared a mistrial on those counts.

2. Longtime Trump personal attorney and fixer Michael Cohen agreed to a plea deal with the Southern District of New York in which he admitted guilt on eight charges and acknowledged that he had discussed or made hush payments to two women alleging affairs with Trump in order to keep damaging information from becoming public, at the direction of and in coordination with a candidate for federal office. That candidate, although Cohen didn't name him, is obviously Donald Trump.

Either of these developments could make for a disastrous week for the President of the United States, who has watched special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Russian 2016 election interference draw ever closer to him as it has gone along. But for both Manafort to be found guilty and Cohen to not only plead guilty but to implicate Trump in a payoff that violates campaign finance law is, literally, catastrophic for the Trump White House.

While both stories are very big deals, the Cohen plea is more important in terms of its direct impact on Trump.

Remember that Cohen has acknowledged discussing or making payments to both porn star Stormy Daniels and ex-Playboy model Karen McDougal during the course of the 2016 campaign as a way to ensure their silence about alleged affairs they conducted years earlier with Trump.

Cohen at first insisted that the Daniels payment was made out of his own pocket and without any direct or indirect knowledge by Trump. Of the payoff, Cohen said back in February: "In a private transaction in 2016, I used my own personal funds to facilitate a payment of $130,000 to Ms. Stephanie Clifford. Neither the Trump Organization nor the Trump campaign was a party to the transaction with Ms. Clifford, and neither reimbursed me for the payment, either directly or indirectly."

In a New York City courtroom on Tuesday, Cohen admitted that wasn't true. He said he sought to keep the payments -- as well as their source -- out of the public eye "in coordination and at the direction of a candidate for federal office."

And those 12 words are a very, very, very big problem for Donald Trump. Here's why.

In April, Trump was asked about the Stormy Daniels payout by reporters. Here's that exchange:
Reporter: "Did you know about the $130,000 payment to Stormy Daniels?"
Trump: "No."
Reporter: "Then why did Michael Cohen make [the payment], if there was no truth to her allegations?"
Trump: "You'll have to ask Michael Cohen. Michael's my attorney, and you'll have to ask Michael."
Reporter: "Do you know where he got the money to make that payment?"
Trump: "No I don't know."

We've already learned, thanks to Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani, that Trump paid Cohen back the $130,000 that was funneled through a shell company knows as Essential Consultants LLC to Daniels. But even that admission still gave Trump some level of plausible deniability: Sure, he was regularly paying Cohen a retainer to fix problems, but Trump never knew about any of the details of the payments or what they were for.

Except that's no longer accurate, according to what Cohen said as part of the plea deal. If Cohen was contemplating the payment to Daniels and McDougal at the "direction" of and in "coordination" with Trump, it's impossible for the President's statements made aboard Air Force One back in April to be accurate. Literally impossible.

What that means -- if Cohen's plea is to be taken at face value, which the Southern District of New York quite clearly does -- is that Trump may have not only sought to end-run campaign finance laws in coordination with Cohen in hopes of keeping allegations about his romantic life private but also lied about it.

That. Is. A. Massive. Deal. MASSIVE.

Now, on to Manafort. There was a tendency among some in the immediate aftermath of the ruling to point out two bits of allegedly good news for Manafort/Trump: 1) 10 of the 18 charges had been declared a mistrial and b) the charges all dealt with time long before Manafort came into Trump's orbit.

What that overlooks is that a) Even if the 10 other charges aren't re-tried, Manafort is going to spend years in jail and b) Manafort was Trump's lead campaign operative for an absolutely critical time of Trump's ascent to the presidency.

No matter what Trump says now about how little Manafort did in the campaign or how short a period of time he spent on the campaign, the fact of Manafort's essential role within the campaign is indisputable. And at the very least, Trump's decision to hire Manafort badly undermines the President's oft-repeated promise on the campaign trail that he would only hire the best people in his White House. Trump's former campaign manager has now been found guilty on eight felony charges of financial wrongdoing. You can't just wave that off. Or we shouldn't just wave that off.

I wrote recently that the next two weeks would be an absolutely critical moment for Trump's presidency, for the broader Republican Party and for the country. Now, in the space of a single hour, two massive dominoes have fallen -- and they both landed on Trump. While the Manafort news is more of a glancing blow, the Cohen plea deal is, without question, the biggest problem for Trump personally that has emerged publicly to date. We are talking about the President of the United States being implicated in a purposeful and coordinated attempt to break campaign finance laws. And to do so in service of keeping allegations about his private life out of the public eye during a campaign for the highest office in the land -- an office he won just 11 days after Cohen paid off Daniels.

It's the stuff of nightmares for Trump and his inner circle, sure. But it also poses huge risks for a Republican Party that has largely tolerated Trump's radical presidency in hopes of securing things like long-term conservative dominance on the Supreme Court or a tax cut law. What can or will the congressional leaders within the party say -- particularly given that the 2018 midterm election is now less than 100 days away?

This is a day -- and an hour -- the Trump operation and the broader Republican Party has long dreaded, and likely had come to believe might never arrive. But here we are.

The fallout from this most newsy of hours in the Trump presidency will almost certainly transform the political landscape in the coming days and weeks. Most pressingly, Trump or his lawyers need to try to find some way to explain why he insisted he knew nothing about the payment to Daniels when Cohen has said he kept harmful information from becoming public at Trump's -- or a "candidate's" -- behest. But other questions will have to be asked (and answered) quickly as well: Do Republicans stand by Trump? Does impeachment chatter pick up outside of the fringes of the left? How does the always mercurial Trump react on Twitter to what looks like being caught in a blatant lie?

And then of course there remains Mueller and the report he is working on to detail his findings about Russia's interference in the 2016 election, the possibility of collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign and whether or not Trump may have obstructed the investigation being run out of the FBI.

We don't know the hour -- or the day -- the Mueller report will be released. But that may be the only hour that could eclipse the disastrous 60 minutes Trump endured on Tuesday.
 

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,874
Thanks for the article but would you please point out to me where Trump is accused of a crime? Even if Trump ordered Cohen of paying off the hooker and admits to it where does it violate the law about campaign crimes? I am inclined to believe Trump did in fact try to cover up his activities but that in itself is not a crime. You are so anxious to make a case of bad morals into an impeachable offense that you will call people names if they don’t see where you are coming from. There may be more that comes out of this but to this point the information you have posted outlines nothing about a crime on Trumps behalf. Only that he tried to hush some hookers and used his attorney to do so.
 

boozeman

29 Years And Counting...
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
136,878
Thanks for the article but would you please point out to me where Trump is accused of a crime? Even if Trump ordered Cohen of paying off the hooker and admits to it where does it violate the law about campaign crimes? I am inclined to believe Trump did in fact try to cover up his activities but that in itself is not a crime. You are so anxious to make a case of bad morals into an impeachable offense that you will call people names if they don’t see where you are coming from. There may be more that comes out of this but to this point the information you have posted outlines nothing about a crime on Trumps behalf. Only that he tried to hush some hookers and used his attorney to do so.
Bill Clinton did similar shady shit and back then the Republican party was backed by Evangelicals that wanted him ousted. Now, ~crickets~
 

BipolarFuk

Demoted
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
11,464
Jeremy Toobin said if Trump had lost the election he would have been indicted over this.

But I guess the office of the President is above the law.
 

BipolarFuk

Demoted
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
11,464
Jeremy Toobin said if Trump had lost the election he would have been indicted over this.

But I guess the office of the President is above the law.
 

boozeman

29 Years And Counting...
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
136,878
Jeremy Toobin said if Trump had lost the election he would have been indicted over this.

But I guess the office of the President is above the law.
Kind of how it works. Clinton escaped impeachment and sanctions, so will Trump. It is all about having a fall guy.

Nixon was not the blueprint.
 

boozeman

29 Years And Counting...
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
136,878


I think these retards will still be saying it when Trump is running for re-election.

It is almost like a pro wrestling crowd with a catchphrase.

It is all they got.
 

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,874
Jeremy Toobin said if Trump had lost the election he would have been indicted over this.

But I guess the office of the President is above the law.
I keep asking you what law has been violated? You are still evading or you don’t know. What statues, what title a section under the USC CODE? At this point if Trump did exactly what Cohen says it is a morals thing. Someone at some point might come up with an illegal act that is a violation of something but I have yet to see any crime named.
 

skidadl

El Presidente'
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2004
Messages
11,888
It's going to awesome watching the outrage when Cocaine Mitch still gets Kavanaugh confirmed now
The thing that makes this even more salty is the fact the this nominee isn’t some crazy conservative meanie head. Still, the meltdown will be incredible. The fear tactics that will come out will be funny to watch.
 

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,874
Kind of how it works. Clinton escaped impeachment and sanctions, so will Trump. It is all about having a fall guy.

Nixon was not the blueprint.
Cilnton was Railroaded. He violated no laws that created the Special Proscutor investigation but he fell into the liar and perjury trap that was set. Was he a low morals person, you bet but what President or Congressman isn’t some kind of low life. Hell I can’t believe all the screaming about this like it brand new to to the entire system. Trump paid off hookers. Yes it’s true more than likely.
 

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,874
Jeremy Toobin said if Trump had lost the election he would have been indicted over this.

But I guess the office of the President is above the law.
Maybe you can ask Jeremy Tobin what laws are involved here.
 

jsmith6919

Honored Member - RIP
Joined
Aug 26, 2013
Messages
28,407
The thing that makes this even more salty is the fact the this nominee isn’t some crazy conservative meanie head. Still, the meltdown will be incredible. The fear tactics that will come out will be funny to watch.
Oh yeah the illegitimate scotus pick hot takes are already all over twitter :lol
 

bbgun

every dur is a stab in the heart
Joined
Apr 9, 2013
Messages
30,124
Lesson for Republicans: You don’t abandon your guy just because he had sex with women who weren’t his wife and then lied about it. Dems didn't.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom