President Trump Thread...

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sheik

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
12,113
I probably lost a few of you on that last one. I’ll do better going forward.
 

jsmith6919

Honored Member - RIP
Joined
Aug 26, 2013
Messages
28,407
If Trump is acting like an irresponsible twat, I wanna know that. But if your opinion is illegal immigration is a good thing, and you think Trump is a twat for trying to bottleneck that shit, I don’t need to know that. If he says illegal immigration is bad, I don’t need some cunt telling me Trump hates all immigrants.

Stick to the facts, leave your agenda at the door. Especially you, Anderson Cooper, I don’t need to take pointers on being a man from some powder puff who probably farts baby spirits.
Well what do you expect from someone who got doors opened for him by being Gloria Vanderbilt's kid
 

Chocolate Lab

Kuato Lives
Joined
Oct 2, 2014
Messages
28,442
How much you guys wanna bet that Booze and Iamtdg are back and forth in pm’s right now respecting the shit out of each other?
If we only had a nickel for every "amigo"...
 

jsmith6919

Honored Member - RIP
Joined
Aug 26, 2013
Messages
28,407
 

jsmith6919

Honored Member - RIP
Joined
Aug 26, 2013
Messages
28,407
 

bbgun

every dur is a stab in the heart
Joined
Apr 9, 2013
Messages
30,063
"We must not be distracted by a small number of lawbreakers,” he added.

Thanks for reminding us why he canned you, asshole.
 

Simpleton

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
20,942
Just going to leave this statement from 4-star General James Mattis here. One of the most respected military men in the country, the guy Trump was so proud to parade around as "Mad Dog".

Can't wait to hear the spin on this.

---

IN UNION THERE IS STRENGTH

I have watched this week’s unfolding events, angry and appalled. The words “Equal Justice Under Law” are carved in the pediment of the United States Supreme Court. This is precisely what protesters are rightly demanding. It is a wholesome and unifying demand—one that all of us should be able to get behind. We must not be distracted by a small number of lawbreakers. The protests are defined by tens of thousands of people of conscience who are insisting that we live up to our values—our values as people and our values as a nation.

When I joined the military, some 50 years ago, I swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution. Never did I dream that troops taking that same oath would be ordered under any circumstance to violate the Constitutional rights of their fellow citizens—much less to provide a bizarre photo op for the elected commander-in-chief, with military leadership standing alongside.

We must reject any thinking of our cities as a “battlespace” that our uniformed military is called upon to “dominate.” At home, we should use our military only when requested to do so, on very rare occasions, by state governors. Militarizing our response, as we witnessed in Washington, D.C., sets up a conflict—a false conflict—between the military and civilian society. It erodes the moral ground that ensures a trusted bond between men and women in uniform and the society they are sworn to protect, and of which they themselves are a part. Keeping public order rests with civilian state and local leaders who best understand their communities and are answerable to them.

James Madison wrote in Federalist 14 that “America united with a handful of troops, or without a single soldier, exhibits a more forbidding posture to foreign ambition than America disunited, with a hundred thousand veterans ready for combat.” We do not need to militarize our response to protests. We need to unite around a common purpose. And it starts by guaranteeing that all of us are equal before the law.

Instructions given by the military departments to our troops before the Normandy invasion reminded soldiers that “The Nazi slogan for destroying us…was ‘Divide and Conquer.’ Our American answer is ‘In Union there is Strength.’” We must summon that unity to surmount this crisis—confident that we are better than our politics.

Donald Trump is the first president in my lifetime who does not try to unite the American people—does not even pretend to try. Instead he tries to divide us. We are witnessing the consequences of three years of this deliberate effort. We are witnessing the consequences of three years without mature leadership. We can unite without him, drawing on the strengths inherent in our civil society. This will not be easy, as the past few days have shown, but we owe it to our fellow citizens; to past generations that bled to defend our promise; and to our children.

We can come through this trying time stronger, and with a renewed sense of purpose and respect for one another. The pandemic has shown us that it is not only our troops who are willing to offer the ultimate sacrifice for the safety of the community. Americans in hospitals, grocery stores, post offices, and elsewhere have put their lives on the line in order to serve their fellow citizens and their country. We know that we are better than the abuse of executive authority that we witnessed in Lafayette Square. We must reject and hold accountable those in office who would make a mockery of our Constitution. At the same time, we must remember Lincoln’s “better angels,” and listen to them, as we work to unite.

Only by adopting a new path—which means, in truth, returning to the original path of our founding ideals—will we again be a country admired and respected at home and abroad.
 

Smitty

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
24,058
There is no precedent for deploying the military as Trump suggests because there has rarely been such a stunning failure by local leadership to police riots (deliberately, for political gain, in many instances). Of course we all agree like Mattis is saying that most of the protestors are peaceful, but there is unarguably a sizeable minority who are causing millions or billions of dollars of destruction and damage, not to mention injury and death. If you stopped for ten seconds to read any of these threads instead of just “dropping in,” a piece from Mattis, you’d see that.

Of course if you want to say the US should not deploy the military then I hope you don’t go full hypocrite and you now agree that civilians require pretty much unlimited access to semi automatic weaponry and will be forming militias to put down these piece of shit thieves, looters and rioters.
 

Simpleton

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
20,942
There is no precedent for deploying the military as Trump suggests because there has rarely been such a stunning failure by local leadership to police riots (deliberately, for political gain, in many instances). Of course we all agree like Mattis is saying that most of the protestors are peaceful, but there is unarguably a sizeable minority who are causing millions or billions of dollars of destruction and damage, not to mention injury and death. If you stopped for ten seconds to read any of these threads instead of just “dropping in,” a piece from Mattis, you’d see that.

Of course if you want to say the US should not deploy the military then I hope you don’t go full hypocrite and you now agree that civilians require pretty much unlimited access to semi automatic weaponry and will be forming militias to put down these piece of shit thieves, looters and rioters.
How about being ordered to disperse peaceful protestors so Trump can do some awkward photo op?

How about the overarching point that Trump purposefully seeks to divide and is making a mockery of the Constitution (Mattis' words)?

I'll hang up and listen.
 

Smitty

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
24,058
How about being ordered to disperse peaceful protestors so Trump can do some awkward photo op?

How about the overarching point that Trump purposefully seeks to divide and is making a mockery of the Constitution (Mattis' words)?

I'll hang up and listen.
What about it?

Trump is a massive douche. We all know that. It’s the persona he ran and won on so he can’t just retire it.

Threatening the Constitution though? Spare me.

Yes, Trump is a divider, it’s sad, but he is what you get because the liberal media has been dividing and denouncing conservatives for the better part of my lifetime, so you reap what you sow. Now that they got burned by their own fire they want to play the victim.

Maybe turn down the extremism from the left a bit and they can win an election again.
 

Smitty

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
24,058
What about it?

Trump is a massive douche. We all know that.

Threatening the Constitution though? Spare me.

Yes, Trump is a divider, it’s sad, but he is what you get because the liberal media has been dividing and denouncing conservatives for the better part of my lifetime, so you reap what you sow. Now that they got burned by their own fire they want to play the victim.

Maybe turn down the extremism from the left a bit and they can win an election again.
And on that note:

 

boozeman

29 Years And Counting...
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
136,722
How about being ordered to disperse peaceful protestors so Trump can do some awkward photo op?

How about the overarching point that Trump purposefully seeks to divide and is making a mockery of the Constitution (Mattis' words)?

I'll hang up and listen.
He is a hack who got fired. That is all you need to know.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom