President Trump Thread...

Status
Not open for further replies.

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
125,579
1. The picture in that article is the one sent to Brennan. The article states that the package delivered to CNN was sent by courier but had a half dozen stamps on it. So, it is implying that the one in the picture is the one it is talking about with stamps on it, yet that's not the one that was sent to CNN.

2. It also states that it's not known how the other packages were delivered. Well, the one sent to Brennan obviously was meant to be mailed since it has stamps on it, yet it has no postmark.

3. So, there were two packages delivered with Schultz's office as the return address? Because "A fifth device apparently intended for the man who served as Mr. Obama’s attorney general, Eric H. Holder Jr., was misaddressed and because Ms. Wasserman Schultz’s name was on the return address, it was ultimately delivered to her district office in Florida, a law enforcement official said." Seems a bit odd.
 

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
125,579


If someone was wanting to do harm, why would they put out fake bombs?
 

jsmith6919

Honored Member - RIP
Joined
Aug 26, 2013
Messages
28,407


Take another one off the list
 

BipolarFuk

Demoted
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
11,464


If someone was wanting to do harm, why would they put out fake bombs?
BREAKING!!!

From some guy on Twitter.
 

BipolarFuk

Demoted
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
11,464
TrumpTards are so predictable

TrumpTards are so predictable

The instant, inevitable cries of ‘false flag’ after bomb threats targeting the Clintons, Obamas and CNN

We knew nearly nothing, except that the Secret Service had intercepted “potential explosive devices” targeting the Clintons and Obamas, while investigators also looked into a suspicious package at CNN’s New York offices. Days earlier, authorities found an explosive device in the mailbox of liberal philanthropist George Soros. We did not know who sent them, or why, or what exactly the potential devices were.

But John Cardillo, a right-wing media personality, was already tweeting out his suspicions.

“Investigators need to take a serious look at far left groups like #Antifa when investigating the bombs sent to Soros, Obama, and the Clintons,” he wrote in a now-deleted tweet. “These smell like the false flag tactics of unhinged leftists who know they’re losing.”

Cardillo wasn’t alone. Bill Mitchell, a pro-Trump Twitter mainstay and radio host, was also convinced that the real target of the potential explosive devices was the political power of Republicans.

“These ‘explosive packages’ being sent to the #Media and high profile Democrats has Soros astro-turfing written all over it so the media can paint the #GOP as ‘the dangerous mob.’ Pure BS.” Mitchell wrote. His tweet, which is still live on Twitter, has more than 2,000 retweets.

Online speculation is an inevitable result of a breaking news story on the Internet. On Wednesday, #MAGABomber was the top trending topic on Twitter, propelled by a combination of those assuming the bombs were motivated by Trump’s rhetoric against Democrats and the media — and those who were using the hashtag to criticize it. On the pro-Trump Internet, breaking news speculation has increasingly helped to push the once-fringe idea of politically motivated “false flag” attacks into the mainstream.

Within minutes of the news of the suspicious packages, the “false flag” narrative began circulating in pro-Trump spaces like the r/The_Donald subreddit. Rising posts linked to articles about Bill Ayers, one of the founders of the radical Weather Underground organization, which claimed responsibility for a series of bomb attacks in the 1970s. Another rising post said, “FALSE FLAG. When you hear the MSM screaming about attempted violence by Trump supporters two weeks before Midterms just remember what leftists are capable of.”

Later on Wednesday, Rush Limbaugh promoted the false-flag theory, suggesting that a “Democratic operative” was more likely to have sent the devices than a Republican. “Republicans just don’t do this kind of thing,” Limbaugh said on his radio show. " You’ve got people trying to harm CNN and Obama and Hillary and Bill Clinton and Debbie “Blabbermouth” Schultz and, you know, just, it might serve a purpose here."

Discovery of the devices came just after a big success for the pro-Trump Internet. Ever since Trump’s inauguration, Trump’s online base has amplified and fed a meme claiming that “violent leftist mobs” present a major, immediate threat to the safety of the president and all of his supporters. During the confirmation process for Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh, that meme became the mainstream conservative reaction to protesters who opposed Kavanaugh’s elevation to the Supreme Court. As my colleagues in politics recently reported, stoking fears of the “angry mob” of Trump opponents has become a key part of the GOP’s strategy to energize their voters for the midterms.

Many Republican leaders set aside the “liberal mob” talk to condemn the attacks, including House Majority Whip Steve Scalise (R-La.), and Vice President Pence.

Even as some pro-Trump media personalities started to walk back their “false flag” claims, they referred to the “liberal mob” meme to justify that speculation in the first place.

Michael Flynn Jr., who deleted his tweet calling the situation a “total false flag operation,” followed up with a series of tweets claiming he was just asking questions, and that the timing of the incident was “suspicious.” Flynn Jr., the son of Michael Flynn (who was briefly Trump’s national security adviser), has previously spread the Pizzagate conspiracy theory.

False-flag theories have probably always been popular among conspiracy theorists, who can attempt to discredit literally any event that proves inconvenient to their worldview.

But it’s only the past few years — as social media networks balloons in influence and President Trump inserts conspiratorial thinking into the national discourse, including some ideas that originate on social media — that false-flag theories have become almost a feature of the landscape.

The first viral false-flag theory may have been the 9/11 “truther” movement, whose devotees spammed out blog posts and suspect documentaries claiming the U.S. government secretly masterminded the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks as a pretext to start the Iraq War. (In some versions, CIA operatives imploded the World Trade Center with demolition charges; in others, the government used cruise missiles disguised as planes.)

[Algorithms are one reason a conspiracy theory goes viral. Another reason might be you.]

Similar theories would occasionally bubble up into the news throughout the 2000s and early 2010s, such as Roseanne Barr’s claims about the Boston Marathon bombing.

But since Trump’s election in 2016, false-flag fantasies have become almost as regular as the tragedies they are used to discredit.

See, for example:

A baseless theory that spread virally soon after the Parkland school shooting in February, claiming the U.S. government had staged the massacre as an excuse to seize people’s guns. The children who survived the shooting were “crisis actors,” according to believers, as were the grieving parents. Nearly identical rumors have circulated online after many other school shootings.

Two conspiracy theorists who drove to a church in Sutherland Springs, believing the Department of Homeland Security had staged a recent mass shooting there, and demanded that the church pastor prove to them that his dead 14-year-old daughter had ever existed.

Widespread claims that a man who fired a gun inside a D.C. pizza restaurant in late 2016 (he believed it was a secret child sex dungeon) was actually a false-flag actor trying to discredit other conspiracy theorists.

The mega-viral QAnon conspiracy theory, a core component of which is the belief that special counsel Robert S. Mueller III is only pretending to investigate Trump’s inner circle for possible crimes — and is actually allied with Trump in a global war against liberals.
 

NoDak

Hotlinking' sonofabitch
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
26,085
I love the irony of bipo, the most predictable poster here, calling anyone else predictable.
 

Chocolate Lab

Kuato Lives
Joined
Oct 2, 2014
Messages
28,550
"Economy stifling regulations" :lol

Because nothing fucking matters besides money and jobs right?

Fuck the water you drink.

Fuck the air you breath.

Fuck the food you eat.

It is ALL ABOUT THEY MONEY greedy fucks can get, right?
:lol

Un. Hinged.
 

BipolarFuk

Demoted
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
11,464
Congressman Says Trump May Have To Impose ‘Martial Law’ On Border To Stop Migrant Caravan

Congressman Says Trump May Have To Impose ‘Martial Law’ On Border To Stop Migrant Caravan

Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) suggested that President Donald Trump might have to declare martial law along the southern border of the United States to prevent a large group of Central American refugees and migrants from entering the country.

Gohmert appeared Tuesday on the “Todd Starnes Radio Show,” a Fox News program, to discuss the so-called migrant caravan, a group of thousands of migrants currently en route to the United States to seek asylum or residence.

Starnes called the group of mostly Honduran nationals a “mob.”

“If, in fact, this mob heads towards California, what’s gonna happen then?” Starnes asked Gohmert. “Because [Democratic governor] Jerry Brown will welcome them. You know it’s a sanctuary state. Do you think the president will allow that to happen?”

“I don’t think the president will allow that to happen,” Gohmert replied, suggesting that Trump could send troops to the borders over Brown’s objections and that the California governor would be committing treason by aiding the migrants.

“This has got to be so massive, I mean, you might have to declare martial law along the border,” Gohmert said. “And the Democrats have been to stupid to realize that encouraging this caravan they may actually empower the president to do things they never wanted.”

When Starnes asked Gohmert what “martial law” would look like, the congressman responded that it would mean “federal troops coming in and being at the border, and if anyone tried to stop them, they could be dealt with.”

“You would probably need federal law enforcement to be there to arrest any Americans who might try to stop it,” he elaborated. “The military needs to have their weapons pointed towards Mexico and not toward the American people, but it may be that we have to have enough federal law enforcement, and maybe we have to have the National Guard if Jerry Brown is going to force the issue ― but I hope and pray he won’t be so stupid as to try to stop the U.S. government from enforcing our border because then we’re talking treasonous-type acts.”

This has got to be so massive, I mean, you might have to declare martial law along the border. Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas)

Gohmert’s martial law suggestion is part of the GOP’s hyperbolic response to the group of migrants. As the United States midterm elections approach on Nov. 6, Republican politicians and Trump have framed the caravan as a massive security threat and have accused Democrats of funding the migrants, though they’ve offered no evidence for that assertion.

The migrants have also become a source of conspiracy theories and a target of xenophobic vitriol. Trump alleged without proof that “unknown Middle Easterners” were among them, while Vice President Mike Pence cited false statistics about terrorist arrests at the U.S.-Mexico border.

The caravan, which left Honduras earlier this month, is growing as more people join the loosely associated group rather than risk traveling alone. The migrants are currently over 1,000 miles from the U.S. and could take months to reach the border. Their exact route is unclear.

Gohmert’s off-the-wall remark about martial law is one of the GOP’s most extreme responses to the caravan. Yet it’s not an unfamiliar topic for him: In 2015, Gohmert said he understood conspiracy theorists’ claims that President Barack Obama was secretly planning to declare martial law and send the military to occupy Southern states and put residents in detention camps. The so-called Jade Helm conspiracy theory, embraced by the alt-right, held that military exercises were a cover for a nefarious government plot.

In his interview with Starnes, Gohmert characterized the migrant group as full of violent “gangbangers” and said he had faith that Trump would prevent the group from entering the U.S.

“I just know the president is going to come through with flying colors,” he said.
_______________________________

And so it begins.......
 

fortsbest

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
3,862
Yeah because for all the hate speech supposedly coming from the right, the left media spent all day yesterday comparing Trump to Hitler just like Dickhead here does as much as he can. Calling everyone that disagrees with him vulgar name and dropping his constant rash of BS memes. THe left and the media also without any evidence have spent all day long blaming Trump and looking for "right wingers" to blame for this. They are desperate for it to be a Republican so they can say "ahah! We told you." Morons aren't actually concerned who did it if it wasn't someone from the right. And when its not, they and Bipo will say, the right would have done it or will do it.
 

fortsbest

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
3,862
Breitbart? ~snicker~
Yeah asshat, Doesn't mean it's not true. I'll give you one I know is...5 Dallas PD cops shot by someone that supported BLM. A Bernie supporter shooting up a baseball field of Senators and Capitol Police. But you probably celebrated those didn't you asshole.
 

BipolarFuk

Demoted
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
11,464
Yeah asshat, Doesn't mean it's not true. I'll give you one I know is...5 Dallas PD cops shot by someone that supported BLM. A Bernie supporter shooting up a baseball field of Senators and Capitol Police. But you probably celebrated those didn't you asshole.
No more than you when the right winger skinhead plowed his vehicle into the crowd.
 

boozeman

29 Years And Counting...
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
136,879


Gotta be staged, right?
 

BipolarFuk

Demoted
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
11,464


Gotta be staged, right?
MSNBC DOOD!!

FAKE!!
 

BipolarFuk

Demoted
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
11,464
LOL, this scumbag never fails to go lower than anyone thought possible.

LOL, this scumbag never fails to go lower than anyone thought possible.

 

BipolarFuk

Demoted
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
11,464
 

boozeman

29 Years And Counting...
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
136,879
 

BipolarFuk

Demoted
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
11,464



This guy is a true fucking scumbag.

How many more of his brain dead followers will these tweets incite to violence against the press?
 

fortsbest

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
3,862
Soooo, a complaint about someone or something that is absolutely true is inciting violence against it? Yeah that's a logic only morons like yourself who already have the hate in their hearts can get behind. But let's not talk at all about all the idiots like you calling people Nazis or Hitler or racist or all the other hateful denigrating things that have been said because those things don't at all affect they way people like the Pittsburgh terrorist thinks or feels? Does you pea brain at all get the hypocrisy of these two thoughts?

How about we actually hold people accountable for the crap they do without thinking someone else influenced them by mere speech. How's that for a rational thought because if you think the other way I promise you the left and it's far broader reaching access has influenced a lot more of the violence than anything President Trump has done.
 

BipolarFuk

Demoted
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
11,464
Soooo, a complaint about someone or something that is absolutely true is inciting violence against it? Yeah that's a logic only morons like yourself who already have the hate in their hearts can get behind. But let's not talk at all about all the idiots like you calling people Nazis or Hitler or racist or all the other hateful denigrating things that have been said because those things don't at all affect they way people like the Pittsburgh terrorist thinks or feels? Does you pea brain at all get the hypocrisy of these two thoughts?

How about we actually hold people accountable for the crap they do without thinking someone else influenced them by mere speech. How's that for a rational thought because if you think the other way I promise you the left and it's far broader reaching access has influenced a lot more of the violence than anything President Trump has done.
So what is REAL news to you?

FOX?
Briebart?
Drudge?
Hannity?
Rush?

Labeling an entity such as the press as The Enemy of the People is irresponsible at best by a sitting president. And that fucking cunt does it multiple times.

But I'm sure the only FAKE NEWS is CNN, NBC, ABC, CBS, NPR.........all of them that reports negatively on your Dear Leader.

So spare me, you fucking cult member.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom