NoDak
Hotlinking' sonofabitch
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 23,303
Every time a player is cut?How many times have you seen an owner renig on a deal because he didn't like the way a player performed.
Every time a player is cut?How many times have you seen an owner renig on a deal because he didn't like the way a player performed.
So screwing Jerry Jones is okay? Orton is no different than a bank robber who planned and executed his scheme. But I guess that would be okay too if it was a bank you didn't like.If Orton wanted to retire then he's screwed the Cowboys out of their bonus and is currently jobbing the Bills by taking a position he has no desire to fulfill. I doubt this as I don't think even the Bills would accept a player who didn't practice, prepare, and learn the offense.
If Orton just wanted out of Dallas, then he only screwed Jerry Jones.
I think he just wanted out of Dallas.
I either case, he made the Cowboys front office look like idiots with all their "confidence in Orton" talk.
That's part of the terms of a contract. But he got paid for his poor performance.Every time a player is cut?
It does seem like he wanted out after that final game. Maybe because he was starting, he got a look at Garrett's game plan for the first time...It does sound like there may have been some tampering, also saw a couple people tweeting Orton sold his house here in Dallas right after last season though never did see that verified by anybody credible
Getting cut is part of the terms of a contract? I would like to see those terms.That's part of the terms of a contract. But he got paid for his poor performance.
maybeIt does seem like he wanted out after that final game. Maybe because he was starting, he got a look at Garrett's game plan for the first time...
Yes it is. If a player isn't performing the franchise has a right to cut them. It is no different than any other employee/ employer relationship. When a contract is involved it then becomes a "terminated for cause" circumstance and the cause is substandard performance. I'll bet your agreement with clients have the same contingencies.Getting cut is part of the terms of a contract? I would like to see those terms.
I'd guess it probably is.Getting cut is part of the terms of a contract? I would like to see those terms.
Yep. It's strange because Orton came here knowing full well he'd just be the backup without any chance of starting. Even though Orton probably could competed for a starting job somewhere.maybe
In any case Orton may have thought he would end up playing quite abit here with Tony's back situation and figured if he had to play might as well go somewhere with a defense and an OC who wouldn't call 46 pass plays with a backup qb starting
No sir it is not.So screwing Jerry Jones is okay?
I have no idea what happened but he was under contract and chose to manipulate the organization as a vehicle to opt out. An honorable person would decide to fulfill his obligation or request the contract be altered. He did neither. Instead he used devious practices to obtain his way out.No sir it is not.
Orton didn't want to retire. He wanted to play as a backup, just not for Dallas. This is straight from the Elway/Eli playbook.
I wonder what the Hell happened that would turn him off like that.
No sir it is not.
Orton didn't want to retire. He wanted to play as a backup, just not for Dallas. This is straight from the Elway/Eli playbook.
I wonder what the Hell happened that would turn him off like that.
That's a lot of scratch for a backup.Deal is supposedly 5 million for 1 year, didn't think he would get anywhere close to that
And that's why he wanted out of Dallas. He got to keep the bonus money we paid him and now will make a cool extra 5 mil. The Bills are idiots.That's a lot of scratch for a backup.