Now more than ever, we realize NFL owners won

boozeman

28 Years And Counting...
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
123,344
Now more than ever, we realize NFL owners won



By Ben Volin
| Boston Globe Staff
July 21, 2013

Patriots owner Robert Kraft and then-Colts center Jeff Saturday created the defining moment of the 2011 offseason when they embraced in a bear hug at a news conference announcing the end of the NFL lockout and the agreement of a 10-year collective bargaining agreement.

Almost exactly two years have passed, and now that the realities of the CBA have set in, Saturday might want to take that hug back.

No matter how you slice it, the owners obliterated the NFL Players Association and new executive director DeMaurice Smith in the 2011 negotiations.

The biggest proof came last week when the publicly controlled Green Bay Packers released their annual financial statements. The Packers reported a team-record operating profit of $54.3 million for the 12-month period ending March 31, 2013, a 26 percent increase from the year before, according to the Sports Business Journal.

Even more eye-popping, the Packers’ net income in the two years before the CBA: $22.3 million. In the two seasons since: $85.8 million.

If the Packers are making money hand over fist, so are the 31 other teams.

The players? The rookie pool has been slashed, young players are locked into unfavorable contracts, and the money isn’t trickling to the veterans, who are getting priced out of the NFL, even at minimum salaries. The NFLPA declined to respond to a request for comment.

“The NFLPA absolutely failed the NFL players,” said one prominent agent with two decades in the league, who spoke under the condition of anonymity for fear of retribution by the NFLPA. “It’s the worst CBA in professional sports history. It’s pushing the veterans out of the game and cuts the rookie pay in half. How is that a good deal?”

To be fair, the players have better post-retirement benefits — medical care, pensions, transition programs, and more — under the new CBA. The creation of the $620 million Legacy Fund for pre-1993 players helped correct some mistakes of the past. Players also have a better quality of life, with a shorter offseason program, stricter guidelines on contact in practice, and the elimination of two-a-days in training camp.

Then again, the owners probably were happy to cave on those demands. It helps them promote player safety and ward off lawsuits. And do you think Kraft or any owner cares if his players have two-a-days?

But when it comes to the serious stuff — splitting up the NFL’s $9 billion in revenue — the NFLPA “got taken to the woodshed,” said another agent with 18 years of experience.

“Yeah, players got better post-retirement stuff, but I’d rather have an extra million in my bank account today than a few extra grand in my pension in 40 years,” he said. “The owners used the bad economy to cry poor, and then they took everything.”

How badly did the owners beat down the NFLPA? Let us count the ways:

1. The rookies got a raw deal.

The owners said the system needed to be fixed when a bust such as JaMarcus Russell could make $37 million guaranteed and Sam Bradford, the last No. 1 overall pick under the old CBA, could get $50 million guaranteed before playing a snap.

Rookie contracts got slashed in the new CBA, with Cam Newton, the No. 1 overall pick in 2011, getting just $22 million guaranteed. What’s more, rookie signing bonuses have remained flat for the last three seasons. Kansas City’s Eric Fisher, the 2013 No. 1 overall pick, will get the same $14.518 million signing bonus that Newton and Andrew Luck (2012) did.

And only the top picks are receiving top dollar. Jacksonville cornerback Johnathan Cyprien, the first pick of the second round, will have a modest salary cap number of $994,382 this year. Players taken in rounds 3-7 are all in the $400,000-$500,000 range, with the league minimum at $405,000.

But perhaps the worst deal for the rookies: All drafted players are locked into their contracts for at least three years. The CBA prevents any drafted player from renegotiating his contract until after his third season. Most rookies do get increases in base salary over each of their four seasons, however, and they’re also subject to player performance bonuses if they reach playing time markers.

Russell Wilson, who had a phenomenal rookie season after being drafted in the third round by the Seahawks, has no choice but to play the 2013 season at his base salary of $526,217. Even if they wanted to, the Seahawks can’t extend his contract until after the 2014 season.

This rule is brutal on running backs, who are by far the biggest injury risk and often don’t even make it to Year 4. Even if they do, a team has much more incentive to draft another pair of young, cheap legs instead of committing major dollars to a veteran back. A running back is almost better off sitting on the bench for two years instead of wasting his hits at minimum salary.

2. Veterans get squeezed.

The money saved on the rookies was supposed to trickle down to the veterans, but instead it appears it’s simply going straight into the owners’ pockets.

While quarterback pay continues to skyrocket, and a couple of veterans were able to cash in during free agency — Miami’s Mike Wallace, Kansas City’s Dwayne Bowe, Cleveland’s Paul Kruger — the incredible value of rookie contracts is now squeezing out many veterans.

Why would a team pay big money to a free agent when it can simply draft a cheaper, healthier alternative and have him locked in to a near-minimum salary for at least three seasons?

Some free agents, such as Miami’s Dustin Keller, Seattle’s Michael Bennett, Denver’s Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie, and New England’s Aqib Talib, took modest one-year deals after receiving low-ball offers on multiyear deals. Cliff Avril, who played for $10.6 million last year as the Lions’ franchise player and is just 27, was only able to score a two-year deal with $6 million guaranteed from the Seahawks.

And while the CBA promises minimum salaries for veterans — $715,000 this year for players with 4-6 years of experience, $840,000 for 7-9, and $940,000 for 10-plus — many times it works against them.

“I’ve had teams tell me all the time, ‘Your guy is a minimum-salary guy, he’s too expensive,’ ” the first agent said. “I have veteran players that would play for $50,000 if they could.”

3. Owners hold all the cards.

The salary cap in 2009 was $123 million, decreased to $120 million for 2011, and will remain relatively flat for the foreseeable future. The cap rose to $123 million this year, but only after the NFLPA allowed the owners to defer payments on performance-based pay for 2013, which totaled $110.7 million in 2012 and was split among dozens of players.

Player-performance money that is earned in 2013 and should be paid out in March 2014 will instead be held in an account and paid out in March 2016, with the owners keeping two years’ worth of interest.

The salary cap isn’t even supposed to increase in 2014 when the NFL will receive an influx of new television money — $3.1 billion annually from broadcast revenue, up from $1.9 billion.

The CBA only requires teams to spend in cash 89 percent of the salary cap number, and teams can roll over any unused cap space from year to year. Often, teams would rather keep the cap money for rollover purposes than use it on a veteran who may or may not pan out.

And worst of all, players are stuck with this deal through the 2021 draft.

Many agents, naturally, are incensed about the deal and are pining for the days of Gene Upshaw.

“There was never any transparency from the union to the players,” another agent said. “It was basically, ‘We’ve agreed to terms on the deal, we expect everyone to ratify it, and let’s pop champagne bottles.’

“De Smith was a slick trial lawyer who came in and sold the players on a fancy PowerPoint presentation. Ninety-eight percent of the players have no understanding how bad this deal is.”

WEARING DOWN



Lower-body pads are now a must


If NFL players look a bit bulkier this fall, there’s a reason — for the first time since 1994, the NFL is mandating all players except kickers and punters to wear thigh and knee pads.

The NFL estimated that only 30 percent of players wore lower-body pads last season, and in recent years wide receivers and defensive backs in particular have opted not to wear them because they can limit their speed. College players are required to wear the pads, however.

But the NFL is emphasizing safety now, and players will not be allowed to take the field unless they are wearing thigh and knee pads.

“If he finds his way to the field, he will actually be removed from the game until he makes the adjustment and puts on the proper padding,” said former 49ers safety Merton Hanks, now an assistant director of operations for the NFL. “In today’s NFL, wearing thigh and knee pads is no different than wearing your helmet or shoulder pads.”

Hanks said players will be inspected in the locker room by an equipment official, and will face a fine of $75,000 if they manage to play without the pads.

The NFL has approved 37 different pads for use, and players can choose the pads that suit them best. Hanks said he has talked to several veterans about the new rule, and “while they’re not enamored with the change, they understand it’s the nature of the game and they’ll make every effort to comply by getting the lightest, strongest pad for their purposes.”

Former Patriots coach Bill Parcells said getting players to wear knee and thigh pads “was a constant battle for me . . . I’m glad that we are enforcing that. I think the players sometimes don’t know what’s in their own best interest.”

OUT OF WATER



Dee was never a good fit with the Dolphins


Mike Dee helped oversee an era of unprecedented success and growth for the Red Sox and Fenway Park when he held multiple roles, including chief operating officer, from 2002-09.

He parlayed that success into a gig as the CEO of the Miami Dolphins after Stephen Ross bought the team in 2009, but Dee simply couldn’t replicate his business magic in South Florida.

Dee left the Dolphins on Wednesday to become president and CEO of the San Diego Padres, the team he worked for from 1995-2002. It’s a nice landing spot, for sure, but Dee was often like a fish out of water in his role with the Dolphins, as he didn’t quite grasp the market or the sport, and will be mostly remembered for the team’s bizarre promotions — remember “Gator Day” with Tim Tebow?

Dee came to Miami with two goals — improve attendance and help secure funding for stadium renovations — and went 0 for 2. The Dolphins filled only 76.3 percent of their seats in 2012 — the only team under 83 percent — and their bid to secure funding for Sun Life Stadium died in the Florida House of Representatives in May.

The Dolphins announced that they will use the search firm Turnkey Sports and Entertainment to help find a new CEO, but they might already have a promising candidate close by — Matt Higgins, formerly the Jets’ executive vice president of business operations and Woody Johnson’s right-hand man. Higgins left the Jets in 2012 to take a job as CEO of one of Ross’s side companies, RSE Ventures.

ETC.



Barth is kicked out before season starts


Nothing Good Happens in the Offseason, Part 47: The Buccaneers announced that kicker Connor Barth will miss the season after tearing his Achilles’ in a charity basketball game last weekend, and undergoing surgery. The team signed former Giant Lawrence Tynes to replace him.

Barth tied Detroit’s Jason Hanson for most field goals of 40-plus yards last season (18), although he did not handle kickoff duties.

Not only will Barth not play this year, but because he hurt himself away from football, the Buccaneers put him on the non-football injury list and can avoid paying some of his $2.3 million base salary if they so choose.

Birds chirping

Talk about some backhanded swipes at Kevin Kolb coming out of the Cardinals’ locker room.

Arizona swapped out Kolb for Carson Palmer this offseason, and the players haven’t been shy about their approval.

“I don’t want to disrespect anyone, but now we have a real quarterback to go with a good defense,” Calais Campbell told CBSSports.com.

Added Larry Fitzgerald on SiriusXM: “We have a guy now who can make all the throws and get our offense rolling.”

It should be noted that Kolb, now with the Bills, went 4-2 with eight touchdowns and three interceptions last season before getting hurt. The Cardinals went 1-9 after Kolb went down, including seven straight losses.

Firing first shot

Dear Houston Texans: Why, oh why, would you poke the sleeping bear?

The Texans announced “themes” for each of their home games this year: “Battle Red Day,” “Pink Ribbon Day,” “Hispanic Heritage Day,” and so on.

The theme for the Dec. 1 showdown against the Patriots: homecoming. The players will wear leather varsity jackets and everyone will have a good laugh.

But it’s also a slap in the face to the Patriots. In college and high school, the homecoming game is scheduled against a patsy opponent likely to produce an easy victory for the home team.

Think Bill Belichick won’t remind his players that the Texans think of them as a lowly homecoming opponent?

Close to home

In other Patriots news: The Pro Football Hall of Fame has removed a 2010 photo of Aaron Hernandez dancing into the end zone after beating Packers cornerback Sam Shields “in the spirit of good taste.” The photo, taken by Mary Schwalm, had been displayed since winning an annual photo contest held by the Hall.

Back in the running

Finally, the always enigmatic and entertaining Ricky Williams is back in football. The former running back, who last played for Baltimore in 2011, will reportedly coach running backs at the University of the Incarnate Word, a Championship Subdivision school in San Antonio.
 

BipolarFuk

Demoted
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
11,464
Score another win for greedy rich cunts over (relatively) the working man.

Unbelievable that almost to a man this board of working stiffs was on the owner's side.
 

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,703
Score another win for greedy rich cunts over (relatively) the working man.

Unbelievable that almost to a man this board of working stiffs was on the owner's side.
That's because the owner is the owner and is entitled to the profits. The employees work for the owner not the other way around. Being an employee entitles you to be paid a wage for your efforts. Only when an owner decides they want to share the profits will it be done. It's not greed it's called fruits of ownership. By the way the owner also pays for the losses of the operation. He doesn't decduct them from the employees wages.
 

BipolarFuk

Demoted
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
11,464
Spare me your holier than thou bullshit.

It is fucking greed. Pure and simple.
 

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,703
Spare me your holier than thou bullshit.

It is fucking greed. Pure and simple.
So what is wrong with greed if the enterprise belongs to you? You act as though it is wrong to accumulate wealth. Go give all your belongings to folks in your community before you call someone holier than thou.
 

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
38,045
:lol the players - millionaires - aren't greedy? They are working men? Good lord that's retarded.
 

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
38,045
Btw this entire article is flawed at best. For one, just because Green Bay made a lot of money doesn't mean all 31 teams are doing the same thing. Green Bay is a small market but also has a following nationally that transcends that market. Let's look at jacksonville's, buffalo's cincinnati's, and San Diego's books.

Also, the rookie wage scale is nothing but a good thing. Any premise that bemoans Cam Newton getting "only" $22 mil, never having played a down, is flawed. The Russell Wilson types will make loads of money on their second and third contracts. Desean Jackson dealt with the same thing and hit the lottery on his second contract.

As for running backs, they are so devalued right now they shouldn't be breaking the bank anyway. The few that are worth big money - the petersons and Adrian fosters, will get it.

Regardless, leave it to bipo to turn a dispute between millionaires and bigger millionaires into class warfare. :dunce
 

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,703
Btw this entire article is flawed at best. For one, just because Green Bay made a lot of money doesn't mean all 31 teams are doing the same thing. Green Bay is a small market but also has a following nationally that transcends that market. Let's look at jacksonville's, buffalo's cincinnati's, and San Diego's books.

Also, the rookie wage scale is nothing but a good thing. Any premise that bemoans Cam Newton getting "only" $22 mil, never having played a down, is flawed. The Russell Wilson types will make loads of money on their second and third contracts. Desean Jackson dealt with the same thing and hit the lottery on his second contract.

As for running backs, they are so devalued right now they shouldn't be breaking the bank anyway. The few that are worth big money - the petersons and Adrian fosters, will get it.

Regardless, leave it to bipo to turn a dispute between millionaires and bigger millionaires into class warfare. :dunce
In addition GB doesn't have a single owner. The team is owned by stock holders many of which are John Q. Public. Maybe they should give their dividends to their neighbor.
 

boozeman

28 Years And Counting...
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
123,344
The players are the idiots who agreed to this deal. Now granted the ones who are getting screwed are the veterans who can still play but are getting squeezed down in the market. That said, they only had themselves to blame. They agreed to the deal.
 

Smitty

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
22,585
The players are the idiots who agreed to this deal. Now granted the ones who are getting screwed are the veterans who can still play but are getting squeezed down in the market. That said, they only had themselves to blame. They agreed to the deal.
I feel like the deal is veteran-friendly. The rookies are the ones who get squeezed.

The only problem I see is that, yes, running backs sometimes wear out their production within 4-5 years. So they are seeing their earning potential greatly reduced. But what's the alternative? Go to 2 years? That's not enough for lots of other positions, from the team's perspective, to be able to tell about the player's development.

Maybe 3 is the right compromise.

As far as veterans not getting paid because rookies are cheaper, well, those veterans weren't really worth it to begin with.

I like how it cites Cliff Avril, who "played last season as the Lions franchise player and was only able to get a 2 year, $6 million deal." I don't think anyone is going to confuse Cliff Avril for Reggie White. He was a franchise player like Anthony Spencer was a franchise player. And no one will be surprised if Spencer gets paid and then goes back to having 6 sacks a year.

To me, a guy like Avril getting paid 2 years, 6 million, is market sanity. This writer says the players are getting screwed because the market isn't multiplying exponentially like it was.

Yeah, that was the intended effect. And it's working.

Meanwhile, the players who are worth it will get their money. Most of the teams will always go right up to the cap, like Dallas.
 
Last edited:

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
38,045
The players are the idiots who agreed to this deal. Now granted the ones who are getting screwed are the veterans who can still play but are getting squeezed down in the market. That said, they only had themselves to blame. They agreed to the deal.

That's the other thing. It's one thing if you say, work in retail or Mcdonald's or some unskilled job, yeah, the company can basically pay you whatever and you have little to no power to do anything about. If there is anything where you have an argument for big greedy capitalists, it would be something like that.

It is patently retarded to try to paint the NFL bargaining in that light. The players are not only - in general - millionaires themselves, they have loads of leverage and power. They have special skills that not everyone can do. They have fans bring pressure on management to keep them around. They are not easily replaced. So they don't just have to sit at the bargaining table and get railroaded (not saying they did here, I don't believe that). If there's anything in this deal they don't think is fair, it's their own damn fault.
 

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
38,045
I feel like the deal is veteran-friendly.

That's another thing.

Yes, there are veterans out there (though probably not as many as the article implies) that aren't getting signed now because they would have to be paid a vet minimum wage but wouldn't give an appreciably better performance than a cheaper rookie.

But the real issue there is that the veteran just isn't good enough. The problem isn't with the wage system, necessarily. If 714,000 or 840,000 (which is actually already relatively cheap to pay a veteran player) is too much to pay for a player because you can get the same production cheaper with a rookie, then the vet isn't that good in the first place and maybe these aren't player jobs the NFL should be preserving anyway. You only have yourself and your lack of ability to blame if you can't earn a 800,000 contract in the NFL.
 

BipolarFuk

Demoted
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
11,464
So what is wrong with greed if the enterprise belongs to you? You act as though it is wrong to accumulate wealth. Go give all your belongings to folks in your community before you call someone holier than thou.
Weel, if you are Christian, Matt 19:24 tells your fucking ass straight up that you ain't going to heaven if you are rich.

I don't see Republicians kicking that verse out very often..
 

Clay_Allison

Old Bastard
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
5,488
Weel, if you are Christian, Matt 19:24 tells your fucking ass straight up that you ain't going to heaven if you are rich.

I don't see Republicians kicking that verse out very often..
You're rich compared to people in the Sudan so I guess you're fucked too.
 

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
38,045
It actually says no such thing. You conveniently left out how Jesus said the line before its "hard" (not impossible) for a rich man to enter heaven, and 2 lines later that with God all things are possible. This was in reaction to a rich guy asking Jesus how to get to heaven. Jesus' first response was to follow the commandments. When the guy said he already does all that, Jesus says, ok then give all your stuff to the poor and follow me. And the guy didn't want to do it and walked away. It was basically Jesus' way of pointing out the guy was full of shit. His money was more important to him than God. The whole point is NOT "don't be rich" but rather "put God first above all else."

He is saying it is hard for a rich man to go to heaven. He never once says rich men don't go to heaven. He also says throughout the new testement that it's hard for Everybody to get to heaven. The path to heaven is narrow. Basically focus on God, not material things.

Leave it to a dumbass liberal to make it into his class warfare agenda and completely ignore the actual true meaning.
 

Bluestar71

Brand New Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
602
It's really terrible that teams aren't giving veterans bloated contracts they'll never play up to and relying on the draft like smart teams always have.
 
Top Bottom