K. That settles it. 42 yards it is y'all.42 yards is fine.
Exactly.Football isn't broken.
Stop fucking with everything.
I think the EP is the most boring play in football. I like the idea of making it something that has some apprehension.Don't like it. Stop fixing shit that isn't broken.
Even though an extra point is rarely missed, it is something that is remembered. Especially if it affects the outcome of a game. The Saints were eliminated from the playoff race because of a missed extra point against Jacksonville. It's rare, but people remember stuff like that.
I hardly think their leg is shot after kicking less than a dozen times.This sounds like a good idea until you need a 53 yard kick to win the game and your kicker's leg is shot from kicking EP's all day.
I agree.Don't like it. Stop fixing shit that isn't broken.
Even though an extra point is rarely missed, it is something that is remembered. Especially if it affects the outcome of a game. The Saints were eliminated from the playoff race because of a missed extra point against Jacksonville. It's rare, but people remember stuff like that.
Well, teams would have a decent incentive to go for two, which is a "football" play.I think it's dumb. You should want the kicking game de-emphasized in football. If my team drives 100 yards to score a would-be game tying TD, why would we want the game to be decided on a kicker?
Kicking is so foreign to threat if the game of football. It's like having a soccer game end with free throws.
You want games decided on real football plays for defensive stops, goal line stands or scoring TDs, not because a kicker missed two XPs.
Just eliminate the XP. You get the free point for 7 if you go straight to kickoff.
Maybe this is traditionalist, but I still like having football based around "7" points. If 2 pointers became the norm, scores of 6 and 8 is weird.Well, teams would have a decent incentive to go for two, which is a "football" play.
I am not sure it is being viewed as a "fix" rather a change that could make the game more interesting. It's not like the game hasn't has some changes from time to time over the years.I don't see the need to change the XP. This seems like a case of someone trying to fix something that's not broken.
Who's actually complaining about the XP being a detriment to the game? Why is this such a big issue?
Salary Cap being the biggest.I am not sure it is being viewed as a "fix" rather a change that could make the game more interesting. It's not like the game hasn't has some changes from time to time over the years.
The salary cap coupled with parity affected the dynasty aspect of the sport considerably but as you said they didn't affect the game. The rules of the game have usually been enacted to protect players over the past few years but the most significant rule in my opinion that affected the game is the overtime rules. The game really hasn't changed much and redefining the e.p. doesn't change the game it just adds another element to a particular play.Salary Cap being the biggest.
Granted, not a change to the game itself, but it altered the league like nothing has done before.
I think rule changes on pass interference and illegal contact have changed the game more than anything else that's happened since 1979.The salary cap coupled with parity affected the dynasty aspect of the sport considerably but as you said they didn't affect the game. The rules of the game have usually been enacted to protect players over the past few years but the most significant rule in my opinion that affected the game is the overtime rules. The game really hasn't changed much and redefining the e.p. doesn't change the game it just adds another element to a particular play.