Smitty
DCC 4Life
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 22,561
I feel like either Barr or Donald will almost certainly be there.I would love to get Barr but I can't think of a reason the Steelers would pass on him.
I feel like either Barr or Donald will almost certainly be there.I would love to get Barr but I can't think of a reason the Steelers would pass on him.
I'd easily return to the 3-4 depending on our next DC hire.According to some of the draft reports I have read, expect Barkevious Mingo-type rookie season out of him due to the fact he has never played DE in a 4 man front.
Makes me wish we had not abandoned the 3-4.
the Steelers cut Woodley and Barr would be a great replacement as a pass rushing OLB.I feel like either Barr or Donald will almost certainly be there.
Not every pick before us is going to be a player we want. We do this every year, we think the teams in front of us want the same players we want, because, well, those are the ones that are desirable in our minds.the Steelers cut Woodley and Barr would be a great replacement as a pass rushing OLB.
They just spent a 1st on Jones, want to sign Worilds long-term and have many other needs.the Steelers cut Woodley and Barr would be a great replacement as a pass rushing OLB.
I don't agree with that. I think Lewan is the better player, but Martin IMO is a better fit for our current team since he an play both G and T. And, let's not act like we are comparing 1st round talent with 5th round talent. Martin is a 1st round prospect.Lewan and it's not even remotely close.
No defense works without the proper personnel.I'd easily return to the 3-4 depending on our next DC hire.
If I have to choose between a guy who is excellent at one position and a guy who is just good at two positions, I always take the first guy.I don't agree with that. I think Lewan is the better player, but Martin IMO is a better fit for our current team since he an play both G and T. And, let's not act like we are comparing 1st round talent with 5th round talent. Martin is a 1st round prospect.
And, I said that Lewan should be the pick if both are there. I was referring to the inference that there is this huge gap between the two players, because there isn't.If I have to choose between a guy who is excellent at one position and a guy who is just good at two positions, I always take the first guy.
I'm not even a big Lewan fan to be honest. I saw him get beat too much at Michigan for my preference. I think he is a hell of an athlete but gets overrated. Just in theory I don't really give bonus points to these versatile offensive lineman. If I'm talking about a backup I care about versatility but my first round pick had better be a starter. I'm not worried about versatility when I am trying to draft a stud starter.And, I said that Lewan should be the pick if both are there. I was referring to the inference that there is this huge gap between the two players, because there isn't.
You are letting his versatility muddle your opinion. Just because he can play both positions doesn't automatically make him a mediocre player. Because he is far from a mediocre player. He will be a starter in this league at one position or the other for a long time.I'm not even a big Lewan fan to be honest. I saw him get beat too much at Michigan for my preference. I think he is a hell of an athlete but gets overrated. Just in theory I don't really give bonus points to these versatile offensive lineman. If I'm talking about a backup I care about versatility but my first round pick had better be a starter. I'm not worried about versatility when I am trying to draft a stud starter.
And this is exactly what we bitch about with this team. You included.I think Lewan is the better player, but Martin IMO is a better fit for our current team since he an play both G and T.
Well, we aren't blowing the team up, so I guess I'm beaten down into the reality that we are stuck with trying to win now.And this is exactly what we bitch about with this team. You included.
A player taken at 10 versus a player taken at 16 is not "very clearly" on the next level down.I'm not insinuating there is a 1st round - to - 5th round difference between Martin and Lewan.
But Lewan is a top 10 prospect on par with Donald and Barr, IMO, a half step behind the elite guys like Mack and Robinson.
Martin is in the very clear next level down. Taking him over Lewan would be like taking Jernigan over Donald. Still getting a good player -- and technically a more versatile one -- but IMO clearly the inferior one.
Why not? Every year there are clearly some blue chip guys that pretty much every one considers a can't miss player. Then the next level of players, where the flaws start showing up a little more often. And so on, and so on...A player taken at 10 versus a player taken at 16 is not "very clearly" on the next level down.
Players taken 6 spots apart are not on "very clearly" different levels. It's that simple. I do believe that they can be on different tiers, but on "very clearly" different levels is asinine.Why not? Every year there are clearly some blue chip guys that pretty much every one considers a can't miss player. Then the next level of players, where the flaws start showing up a little more often. And so on, and so on...
So you have you're opinion on that. Cool. My opinion is that if the blue chip players run out at say, the sixth person selected, the seventh person selected is "very clearly" on a different level than the first six. And that's only one spot apart.Players taken 6 spots apart are not on "very clearly" different levels. It's that simple. I do believe that they can be on different tiers, but on "very clearly" different levels is asinine.
Yep, I don't agree with that. On a different tier, sure. On a "clearly different" level, nope.So you have you're opinion on that. Cool. My opinion is that if the blue chip players run out at say, the sixth person selected, the seventh person selected is "very clearly" on a different level than the first six. And that's only one spot apart.