Genghis Khan
The worst version of myself
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 44,902
Forget the dead money... what is Delaware'a government giving away?
You definitely don't want to know.
Forget the dead money... what is Delaware'a government giving away?
True, but back then they supposedly agreed upon $40 million per. Sure the agent wasn't involved. Back then Micah said he didn't have to be the highest paid defensive player. Things obviously changed. He got the most money and not even close.
Agree that this is mostly spin, but I do think those leadership and work ethic type things could be a factor in offering a guy 41 million a year vs 47.The narrative they're putting out there, that Parsons was a problem all along, doesn't match their actions prior to about a week ago.
My son ran it through madden and it declined the trade with Rashon Gary ( 2 ) 1st’s and a 2nd … cowboys front office is truly fuckin retarded
"Hey, the boss is on the phone and wants to know if you agree with the decision he's made or whether you think he's a moron."
Jerry obviously doesn't like bullshitters, when he's one himself.Micah was bullshitting. He wouldn't have hired this agent if he didn't want a record breaking deal. That's what this agent does.
He's definitely going to be the best 1-Tech DT we've had in over 10 years. And I heard he was battling a toe injury all season last year. DT's can be productive until mid-30's.Someone with Twitter want to post these full threads, presumably with clips?
I watched the all-22 of the Philly playoff game last night and Clark was really good against the run, had a few plays where he got blown out by double teams (i.e. Mailata/Dickerson, which is to be expected) but several where he stood up some of their best OL and didn't allow any movement in his gap.
On the run plays where Clark was on the field Barkley only had like 75 yards on 18 carries I think.
Wait, where is this 'problem' narrative coming from exactly, all I heard being said was their decision to trade Micah was unanimous.The narrative they're putting out there, that Parsons was a problem all along, doesn't match their actions prior to about a week ago.
Wait, where is this 'problem' narrative coming from exactly, all I heard being said was their decision to trade Micah was unanimous.
Yea that stuff dates back to at least last season, maybe further back.Several reporters (Jane Slater was one) have reported that privately the Cowboys patience had worn thin with Parsons, that his attitude was sometimes bad and that some players had complained to coaches / management in the past about him basically putting blame on them in his podcast and whatnot.
As you might imagine, TonyD, I'm super excited to see Clark as a Cowboy.He's definitely going to be the best 1-Tech DT we've had in over 10 years. And I heard he was battling a toe injury all season last year. DT's can be productive until mid-30's.
Several reporters (Jane Slater was one) have reported that privately the Cowboys patience had worn thin with Parsons, that his attitude was sometimes bad and that some players had complained to coaches / management in the past about him basically putting blame on them in his podcast and whatnot.
I don't think this is a big secret... players and coaches got frustrated that he played outside the scheme. I remember Broaddus saying one time on his playing more linebacker, that Micah didn't want to do that because it required more film study and classroom work, and he wanted to just rush the passer. Also heard Calvin Watkins on the Ticket today saying he was doing a story on Micah and asked Charles Haley for some input and Haley wouldn't even comment because he said he couldn't get along with him. (At some point they mended things somewhat.)Slater alludes to it at about 1:45 in this clip. Supposedly came from a former coach and indirectly from players. Micah essentially floated around at meetings, didn't take football seriously, didn't seem to love it, and would say one thing but do another.
No doubt Parcells was going for that here with Ware And Spears. Spears, alas, was no MarshallAs you might imagine, TonyD, I'm super excited to see Clark as a Cowboy.
People don't understand NFL defenses. They think Lawrence Taylor was the whole Giants defense, when there fing IS no Lawrence Taylor without Leonard Marshall, Jim Burt, and George Martin. Marshall alone was a god-damned menace.
We were effectively trying that with Micah, fielding him with no line to protect him.
We replace Micah with an ensemble rotation and AT LAST add a piece that can defeat offenses head on. Clark is at the literal heart of the defense.
Talking heads on TV have no fucking clue how much a difference that guy can make. They are going to go look up his sack numbers.
I can see the coaches simply wanting a resolution so they could get on with the season.Slater alludes to it at about 1:45 in this clip. Supposedly came from a former coach and indirectly from players. Micah essentially floated around at meetings, didn't take football seriously, didn't seem to love it, and would say one thing but do another.
It's been a while since I didn't have Twitter, but if I post the individual posts, can you see the clips then?Someone with Twitter want to post these full threads, presumably with clips?
Would you disagree? Had Dallas invested in their DL scouting a decade ago this might be a different conversation.Bold statements about Micah Parsons there