MacMahon: Pushed by Williams, Randle playing well

[L.T. Fan]

Some of your comments are vague.

Come on Carp what's vague about "as a receiver I prefer Newsome over Harris?"

 

[Carp]

Come on Carp what's vague about "as a receiver I prefer Newsome over Harris?"

Because there would be other moves that would have to be made to accommodate the depth chart like that.

 

[Jiggyfly]

Maybe so but it was directed at Jiggy who was trying to add things into my statements I didn't say. I wasn't directing my position to anything but the two players as receiver preference and he was bringing up areas I hadn't even addressed nor had stated a position about.

Dude stop it, you said you would keep Newsome over Harris any rational person would take that as cutting Harris as several other posters did besides myself.

Stop acting like I put words in your mouth I never did and even asked you to clarify your statement, now maybe you did not mean to imply cutting Harris of Newsome, but stop acting like I just totally took your post out of context.

 

[L.T. Fan]

Dude stop it, you said you would keep Newsome over Harris any rational person would take that as cutting Harris as several other posters did besides myself.

Stop acting like I put words in your mouth I never did and even asked you to clarify your statement, now maybe you did not mean to imply cutting Harris of Newsome, but stop acting like I just totally took your post out of context.

Go back and reread what I said. The words cut,remove,replace or drop Harris is not there. You jumped to that conclusion on your own. What I posted was straight forward. As a receiver I prefer Newsome over Harris. No more was stated by me than that.

 

[L.T. Fan]

Because there would be other moves that would have to be made to accommodate the depth chart like that.

A depth chart like what? Replace Beasley for Newsome. What complicated consideratons iwould be necessary? I am open to knowing that.

 

[Carp]

A depth chart like what? Replace Beasley for Newsome. What complicated consideratons iwould be necessary? I am open to knowing that.

That would be a dumb, knee jerk move too.

 

[Jiggyfly]

Go back and reread what I said. The words cut,remove,replace or drop Harris is not there. You jumped to that conclusion on your own. What I posted was straight forward. As a receiver I prefer Newsome over Harris. No more was stated by me than that.

Your exact words.

I would keep him over Harris.

Yeah that was straightforward and I have been posting in accordance with that statement since, you have now backtracked, just own it.

 

[Carp]

Pwnt

 

[L.T. Fan]

Your exact words.



Yeah that was straightforward and I have been posting in accordance with that statement since, you have now backtracked, just own it.

Of course I would keep him over Harris but the issue never was only one can stay. I reiterated several times that if someone had to go it would be Beasley. Try again.

 

[Carp]

You got pwnt LT. Take your medicine.

 

[boozeman]

You got pwnt LT. Take your medicine.

By Jiggy no less.

Time to take him out back and shoot him.

 

[Jiggyfly]

Of course I would keep him over Harris but the issue never was only one can stay. I reiterated several times that if someone had to go it would be Beasley. Try again.

Reiterated, backtracked, whatever.

How can you keep one over the other and the other one stay that makes no sense, anyway I am done before you go down this rabbit hole any farther.

 

[L.T. Fan]

That would be a dumb, knee jerk move too.

You just say crap without explanation. What would it be?

 

[L.T. Fan]

Reiterated, backtracked, whatever.

How can you keep one over the other and the other one stay that makes no sense, anyway I am done before you go down this rabbit hole any farther.

So I said I would keep him over Harris. I didn't advocate getting rid of Harris as you seem to indicate. The circumstance never evolved to a scenario for me where it became one or the other would have to go. I said I would choose Newsome over Harris as my pick so how do you equate that to me saying Harris would have to go. That aspect was never in the mix except when the question was raised where would I make room in the roster for Newsome and I said I would release Beasley. Keep trying buckaroo.