jsmith6919
Honored Member - RIP
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2013
- Messages
- 28,407
Totally unrelated but think I'm headed to Cheaper Than Dirt to pick up a few more cases of ammo
Totally unrelated but think I'm headed to Cheaper Than Dirt to pick up a few more cases of ammo
Totally unrelated but think I'm headed to Cheaper Than Dirt to pick up a few more cases of ammo
Or they didn't completely follow proper protocol for dealing with patient's who have an infectious disease. I can say at my hospital, there are patient's who are on a contact isolation order which requires one to wear gloves and gowns, but MDs walk in to talk to them without gowning up all the time. You would just hope that something like Ebola would scare people enough to take care.The medical profession is apparently either misinformed or intentionally giving wrong information as to how one can become infected.
Or they didn't completely follow proper protocol for dealing with patient's who have an infectious disease. I can say at my hospital, there are patient's who are on a contact isolation order which requires one to wear gloves and gowns, but MDs walk in to talk to them without gowning up all the time. You would just hope that something like Ebola would scare people enough to take care.
Exactly. I honestly believe it can be contacted by methods other than bodily fluids and infected needles.Well, that may be true...but it certainly looks like its easier to contract Ebola then what the CDC has yelled from the rooftops.
We got a 19 page info packet today at my job. All about Ebola, the risks, precautions and procedures. Everything that was in there is already public knowledge.Exactly. I honestly believe it can be contacted by methods other than bodily fluids and infected needles.
I think the government is trying to suppress public panic by downplaying how infectious the disease is.
All I know is someone that cared for Duncan in full contamination gear now has Ebola....and today it was announced that SEVENTY people had cared for him with direct contact over the course of his sickness in TX.We got a 19 page info packet today at my job. All about Ebola, the risks, precautions and procedures. Everything that was in there is already public knowledge.
I seriously doubt they would give us old or false information so to suppress public panic when working directly with these people.
The red flag is on that particular RN. 70 people cared for him, yet 1 person gets it? That means she was negligent at some point. My guess is she took her gloves off the improper way and got some germs on her. Then it's as simple as rubbing your eyes or picking your nose.All I know is someone that cared for Duncan in full contamination gear now has Ebola....and today it was announced that SEVENTY people had cared for him with direct contact over the course of his sickness in TX.
So...70 people, going home to 3-4 people in their households, plus out eating lunch among the public, shopping, etc......people can downplay the virus all they want....but the fact that someone got it, in the US, with our state of the art treatment and razor sharp ability to keep it from spreading ( according to the CDC) should be a major red flag to whats really happening out there.
And after doing that, did she go home to her husband and kids? Then he went off to his job, the kids off to school? Where did she stop off between work and home?The red flag is on that particular RN. 70 people cared for him, yet 1 person gets it? That means she was negligent at some point. My guess is she took her gloves off the improper way and got some germs on her. Then it's as simple as rubbing your eyes or picking your nose.
Absolutely, it's got scary possibilities.And after doing that, did she go home to her husband and kids? Then he went off to his job, the kids off to school? Where did she stop off between work and home?
Once this shit starts to get away, gonna be awful hard to get a handle on it.
I think you are missing my point. We've been told by the CDC that Ebola is very difficult to get with all the precautions that are in place. Whether the nurse screwed up or not...she was still taking tons of precaution.The red flag is on that particular RN. 70 people cared for him, yet 1 person gets it? That means she was negligent at some point. My guess is she took her gloves off the improper way and got some germs on her. Then it's as simple as rubbing your eyes or picking your nose.
I don't even work in a hospital, but when I use nitrile gloves (for searches at the prison) I use hand sanitizer on the gloves to disinfect them before I take them off.The red flag is on that particular RN. 70 people cared for him, yet 1 person gets it? That means she was negligent at some point. My guess is she took her gloves off the improper way and got some germs on her. Then it's as simple as rubbing your eyes or picking your nose.
I can't speak for that Dallas hospital, but that's not procedure here. You take your gloves off first, then sanitize. Makes sense your way, though.I don't even work in a hospital, but when I use nitrile gloves (for searches at the prison) I use hand sanitizer on the gloves to disinfect them before I take them off.
Just give them back to Mexico and build the wall along Oklahoma and Louisiana.Now they're reporting a second hospital worker has tested positive.
Fuck this, shit. Time to start dropping nukes on Texas.
Now they're reporting a second hospital worker has tested positive.
Fuck this, shit. Time to start dropping nukes on Texas.