Expert Witness: Trayvon Martin was on top of Zimmerman when teen was shot

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
120,444
Stalking is persistent, repeated activity. It involves a series of actions that establish a pattern of behavior.

Now if Zimmerman's creepy cracker ass had followed him home several times, yeah.
Is harassment a crime?
 

boozeman

28 Years And Counting...
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
123,381
Alveda King: Sharpton, Jackson should stop ‘playing race card’ over Trayvon Martin

Posted By Matthew Boyle On 10:30 AM 03/28/2012 In Politics | 14 Comments


Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s niece is criticizing the Rev. Al Sharpton and the Rev. Jesse Jackson for politicizing the Trayvon Martin shooting and leveraging racial tensions to rile up Americans.

Conservative activist Dr. Alveda King, now the director of African-American outreach at Priests for Life and the founder of King For America, said she hopes Sharpton and Jackson stop “stirring up the people without positive solutions” in Sanford, Fla., and elsewhere in the U.S.

“I would believe that, by stirring up all of the emotions and reactions, I wanted to encourage them to remember the man that they say that they followed, to remember that his message was nonviolence and very loving,” King told The Daily Caller, referencing her late uncle. She added that she wanted to encourage Jackson and Sharpton “to talk about nonviolence and not to incite people with that race card that they are very good at playing.”

“Nonviolence was a very important part of the life of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr,” she added. “So, we want to encourage people to be nonviolent in their responses, to be thorough in their research and that justice must be done…We want justice to come, but we want nonviolent responses to this really tragic and terrible incident.”

King hasn’t made up her mind about the facts of this case and who is responsible for what, but believes there should be a full investigation. She told TheDC that she agrees with former Republican presidential candidate and businessman Herman Cain, however, who has asked for a full investigation instead of “swirling rhetoric.”

“I believe that it should be thoroughly investigated,” she told TheDC. “I believe that it should be discovered whether there was undue force. If Trayvon did work to defend himself, he was not armed and so that is an unfair fight right there. Trayvon was not armed and the man who shot him was. So there is a possibility of undue force.” (RELATED: Full coverage of the Trayvon Martin shooting)

She said her heart goes out to Trayvon Martin’s family and she understands what they’re going through. “I’m very concerned about Trayvon’s family,” King said. “I’m praying as well, and many members of my family are as well… Several of us have experienced death of family members by shooting.”

“My grandmother, Mama King, Alberta Williams King, was shot in Ebenezer Baptist Church,” King continued. “My uncle, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., of course, was shot. And, then, my dad [Alfred Daniel Williams King] was killed the next year, drowned in a swimming pool. So, we are not unfamiliar with these kinds of shocks and tragedies to a family. And, so, my first thought is to pray for the family.”

King hopes Americans won’t continue to “hype this up so much to a point and make all this big demonstrations. Of course, there should be an outrage and there should be an outcry. But, remember: There are many other young people who are at risk and many young people getting killed in violent situations.”

She said if her father, A.D. King, and uncle, Martin Luther King Jr., were still alive today, they would handle this tragedy much differently from how Sharpton and Jackson have so far.

“I remember when our home was bombed, and my dad went out to the people and he said, ‘please don’t riot, please don’t react violently, my family and I are alright,’” King said. “’If you have to hit anybody, hit me. So please, I’d rather you be nonviolent and don’t strike out.’ So, my uncle would urge a call for justice but he would also urge nonviolence in responses. He would do that, I can assure you he would.”

Moving forward on this storyline, King said Americans “should be watchful for racial profiling, for stereotypical responses.”

“We also should urge people to know that we are one human race,” she said. “We’re not separate races. There’s only one human race.”

King said the news media — which she said was largely responsible for Martin’s story gaining a massive national following — should remember that there are many struggles being encountered by America’s youth.

“I would like for the media to be aware of how dire circumstances are and to be a little more compassionate in reporting and to be fair, of course,” King said. “To be honest and truthful, but to know that we’re dealing with some dire circumstances and this is not a one-time occurrence. There are issues involved here — certainly the racial issue is a question, but it’s not the only thing because we have violence against young people from those who are within their own racial communities and their own ethnic groups.”

King adds that racism still exists in America today, and the American people need to watch for it and fight back the way her uncle, Martin Luther King, Jr., taught. “This is the 21st century and we would all like to think racism is dead in America,” King said. “Actually, that’s not the case, still there are some racial issues that are out across this nation and so we have a responsibility as compassionate citizens of America, no matter what our ethnic group happens to be, to confront these issues when they arise. The best way to confront it is with God’s love, and if my uncle and my father were here today, they’d say that to you: ‘God’s love.’”
 

Smitty

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
22,585
Not sure. Why does it matter that you claim Martin stole the Skittles and ied tea?
It doesn't matter as to the resolution of George Zimmerman being rightfully found not guilty of both murder and manslaughter.

If Iamtdg is saying that Zimmerman was a douche who was profiling and possibly committing some other crime, I agree. Of course then I also would say that Martin was also most certainly a punk who was up to no good, but neither of those things matter at the end of the day when resolving the issue of Zimmerman's self defense.
 

boozeman

28 Years And Counting...
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
123,381
It doesn't matter as to the resolution of George Zimmerman being rightfully found not guilty of both murder and manslaughter.

If Iamtdg is saying that Zimmerman was a douche who was profiling and possibly committing some other crime, I agree. Of course then I also would say that Martin was also most certainly a punk who was up to no good, but neither of those things matter at the end of the day when resolving the issue of Zimmerman's self defense.
So then you mentioning the fact you "think" he was up to no good and stole the shit from the 7-Eleven meant what exactly?
 

Jiggyfly

Banned
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
9,220
Defend yourself from what? Questions? Pretty sure your defense to that is not talking... Or call the cops and file harassment charges.
Defend myself from what is a good question, nobody knows what Zimmerman did or said once they met up.

Do you believe his entire story?

I am not saying Trayvon did not throw the 1st punch, but its not totally unfathomable that Zimmerman did not try and grab him or something he was very concerned that "they" always get away.
 

Jiggyfly

Banned
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
9,220
He could have profiled him the same way. You can't take a swing at someone based on them briskly walking next to you and asking questions. In no way is that self defense. Briskly walking and questions don't constitute an attack that I am aware of. (In no way am I saying that this is what actually happened by the way)
You are sounding like this is what happened for sure, what is Trayvon tried to keep walking and Zimmerman grabbed him?
 

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
120,444
I'm saying it's impossible to make a judgement call in this since there are too many unknowns. There is absolutely no way for anyone to know who started the fatal confrontation, but we do know that GZ followed him and created the situation to begin with. Screw courtroom/lawyer type who is legally bound to what. Had Zimmerman not followed him none of this would have happened. That much is fact, and no one can dispute it.
 

Jiggyfly

Banned
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
9,220
I disagree. Part of it happened because Zimmerman was overzealous, but that tragic outcome happened because Martin was overzealous in reacting to Zimmerman. You can say Zimmerman should have just let the police handle and you would be right but you can say the exact same thing about Martin.
The only thing we know is what Zimmerman said and he had plenty of holes in his story so for you to Martin was overzealous is showing bias, for all you know Zimmerman threw the 1st punch and missed or he tried to detain Martin.

I readily admit that he deserved to be acquitted the way the case played out in court, but the prosecution left a lot of stuff on the table and never pointed out the inconsistencies in his story.
 

Jiggyfly

Banned
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
9,220
I'm saying it's impossible to make a judgement call in this since there are too many unknowns. There is absolutely no way for anyone to know who started the fatal confrontation, but we do know that GZ followed him and created the situation to begin with. Screw courtroom/lawyer type who is legally bound to what. Had Zimmerman not followed him none of this would have happened. That much is fact, and no one can dispute it.
:buddy
 

Smitty

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
22,585
I'm saying it's impossible to make a judgement call in this since there are too many unknowns. There is absolutely no way for anyone to know who started the fatal confrontation, but we do know that GZ followed him and created the situation to begin with. Screw courtroom/lawyer type who is legally bound to what. Had Zimmerman not followed him none of this would have happened. That much is fact, and no one can dispute it.
I don't think anyone is disputing that.
 

Smitty

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
22,585
The only thing we know is what Zimmerman said and he had plenty of holes in his story so for you to Martin was overzealous is showing bias, for all you know Zimmerman threw the 1st punch and missed or he tried to detain Martin.

I readily admit that he deserved to be acquitted the way the case played out in court, but the prosecution left a lot of stuff on the table and never pointed out the inconsistencies in his story.
What inconsistencies are you referring to?

Because while I agree we will never know for sure who threw the first punch, I tend to think most of the evidence backed up Zimmerman's story.
 

Jiggyfly

Banned
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
9,220
What inconsistencies are you referring to?

Because while I agree we will never know for sure who threw the first punch, I tend to think most of the evidence backed up Zimmerman's story.
Here are a couple.

How could Mr. Martin have grabbed for the gun and not left DNA on it? How could he have even seen that tiny gun in Mr. Zimmerman’s waistband in the dark? Why would Mr. Zimmerman get out of the car and follow Mr. Martin if he was scared of him? How could Mr. Martin have been punching Mr. Zimmerman, covering his mouth and reaching for his gun at the same time? And wouldn’t Mr. Zimmerman have suffered more grievous wounds to his head if Mr. Martin had slammed it against the pavement 25 times?
The biggest one for me was that the gun was on his back hip and inside his waistband how Martin see it and how did he get it away so cleanly to get that great of a shot off.
 
Top Bottom