I put a stop on shooting 556 a few months back when it started to get hard to find. FFS they're going for $1+ a round right now and I have 13k-ish rounds. Have a nice stockpile of 9 and 45 too
I really need more 9 rounds right now. I only have a couple hundred. If you run across some let me know.I put a stop on shooting 556 a few months back when it started to get hard to find. FFS they're going for $1+ a round right now and I have 13k-ish rounds. Have a nice stockpile of 9 and 45 too
Or I did before the boating accident
Shits ridiculous right now, I have been stopping by Basspro after work the last month and buying whatever they have in stock which isn't much.
I know you’re going to say I’m just trolling and whatnot, but I saw a couple of documentaries about “Gerrymandering” and wonder what you think about it. I understand the basis of it (how it works in your favor to lose few areas by a lot of votes and win more by a slim margin), but I don’t understand why it’s changed every 10 years and what dictates what size you make each district? Is it based on population?
Gerrymandering has fuckall to do with the Presidential election because it is the statewide total that determines who that states electors cast their vote for
I’m not asking because of the presidential election dumbass.
Yeah sure thing you third world bitch
What determines the voting districts is the census. It is taken every 10 years and the district lines are adjusted to reflect the appropriate representation for that district.
I’m not one to take sides but this one tickled my funny bone.
Whatever redneck bigot
The original count should have been like that BEFORE the ballots were separated from the envelopes.
what happened?
This.
To get this ball rolling, some genius will require a $$million+ study to determine if a committee should be selected to discuss the pros and cons of this suggestion who will then sanction a $10 million dollar feasibility study which when completed in 10 years goes back to the original committee who must raise funds to review this feasibility study after which time it will be forwarded back to the committee who authorized said study who now proclaims this feasibility study they originally ordered too outdated to justify any changes sending us right back where we started but they now must raise $5 million dollars to fund a new study to determine if a committee should be selected to discuss the pros and cons of this suggestion and round and round we go, where it stops, nobody knows..
I haven't seen anything tangible. I've seen accusations that sound terrible but no actual proof.
