- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 122,856
Not really lazy. The QB market sucks.Just plain laziness.
I get it.
But how they figure this guy is an improvement over the two clowns we let go, get the fuck out of here.
Not really lazy. The QB market sucks.Just plain laziness.
Is he better then Cassel and Weeden? Maybe. I don't really know because Moore hasn't played much at all for a long time. That's why you have to bring him in to look at him. Cassel on the other hand I know is washed up. Weeden sucks. Always has and always will.Not really lazy. The QB market sucks.
I get it.
But how they figure this guy is an improvement over the two clowns we let go, get the fuck out of here.
Moore is and always has been a content, career backup.Is he better then Cassel and Weeden? Maybe. I don't really know because Moore hasn't played much at all for a long time. That's why you have to bring him in to look at him. Cassel on the other hand I know is washed up. Weeden sucks. Always has and always will.
Moore is and always has been a content, career backup.
He's a lifer who is only a consideration because Garrett remembers him and still recalls how his little buddy Mike Riley stuck up for him.
I fail to see how he is going to be any different than the other losers when he is thrust into a role with real responsibility.
Bingo. That's exactly it.Moore is and always has been a content, career backup.
He's a lifer who is only a consideration because Garrett remembers him and still recalls how his little buddy Mike Riley stuck up for him.
Exactly. Lazy. Like I said.Bingo. That's exactly it.
They didn't really want to lose him in the first place so now they'd like to bring him back. Never mind that he's really not any good.
By top of the draft you mean Dak Prescott in the 3rd?If we sign him, I take it as intent to take a QB at the top of the draft. He's a backup plan in case the draft board falls through. Either that or we didn't learn a damn thing from last year.
This franchise is so weird, I honestly don't know. If they're drafting for long term, I think Goff makes sense. That's the kind of pick I'd expect from Steven.By top of the draft you mean Dak Prescott in the 3rd?
I'll say this, if we end up taking Goff at 4 the organization will have done one hell of a job at smokescreening. The more likely scenario is that they're just idiots and actually prefer Prescott in the 3rd as opposed to Goff at 4.
we're trading down from 4 to 31?This franchise is so weird, I honestly don't know. If they're drafting for long term, I think Goff makes sense. That's the kind of pick I'd expect from Steven.
It also makes sense considering our tendency to address a position with full force, after ignoring it for too long.
But 8 bet we end up trading down. Someone like the Broncos will pay to draft Goff if he's on the board.
Not for free. Broncos have a SB caliber team, and just need a decent QB to keep it on the road. There might be other suitors with earlier picks, but if someone is willing to let us compile draft picks, I bet we do it.we're trading down from 4 to 31?
For their 1st, 2nd and 3rd in 2016-18?we're trading down from 4 to 31?
Schlub. Was bad in Miami. Mediocre in Philly. Coming off a broken ankle from Thanksgiving.What does everybody think of Nolan Carroll visiting? I don't know much about him but I know he's a big corner
He's a rock solid 3rd CB, could probably play as your 2nd in a pinch although you'd probably look to upgrade when the opportunity arises.What does everybody think of Nolan Carroll visiting? I don't know much about him but I know he's a big corner