Cowboys Free Agency Thread

[Stasheroo]

Why in the holy fuck not?

 

[Stasheroo]

Why in the holy fuck not?

Gotta burn $9.1 million on Tyrone Crawford!

 

[Cowboysrock55]

Why in the holy fuck not?

Fisher said this?

Expect the signing tonight.

 

[NoDak]

Also mentioned about those imaginary double teams that Lawrence was getting that Quinn wasn't as 'evidence', didn't ya? Or was that another account hack?[/qoute]

If you don't think that Lawrence was receiving vastly more attention than Quinn was from the blocking schemes, I don't know what to tell you. Other than to open your eyes and pay a little more attention to what's going on other than just reading the stat line in the monday morning paper.

Who posted those Tolbert stats under your account?

Who was it that came up with the bullshit post about Tolbert's sack numbers from the 90's? Who was that asshole? Someone hack your account or do you simply take zero accountability for your own actions while lecturing others?

Are you trying to imply that I am now saying that I didn't post them? Quite the opposite, actually. What I AM saying is that it was done to show you how ignorant it is to only go by raw sack numbers to make your case as to who the best pass rushers are. Try to keep up.

Check out what you "reveal" about yourself along the way and don't just focus on 'the other guy'.

You said I couldn't admit when I was wrong. So I'll do that right here and now. I originally thought that you were an intelligent. mature poster when you first came over here from the zone.

But you have clearly revealed here that I was wrong. Boy, was I ever wrong.

 

[NoDak]

I'm sorry, exactly what 'stats' did you show me? During your repeated lecturing, I somehow missed them? I'd be happy to talk with you about them if you'd post them again. Thanks.

The last time someone showed you stats, you threw a hissy fit and started talking about the 90's.

Jesus. It's not an act. You really are this dumb.

I posted about those sack numbers from the 90's to show you how stupid it is to go strictly off of sack numbers. Anybody with a functioning brain knows that Charles Haley was our best pass rusher on those teams.

God damn. He's like a younger, angrier version of LT.

 

[Stasheroo]

Jesus. It's not an act. You really are this dumb.

I posted about those sack numbers from the 90's to show you how stupid it is to go strictly off of sack numbers. Anybody with a functioning brain knows that Charles Haley was our best pass rusher on those teams.

God damn.

And you though that was somehow relevant to the conversation, "God damn" indeed.

Again, not mature enough to accept that you were dead wrong about the double team numbers, so you got your panties in a wad and went full on brain dead.

Never try to fucking lecture anybody again on their behavior when yours is exactly what got us here.

Another asshole who can't admit when they're wrong.

 

[DontCryWolfe]

Guys, guys, guys...

Logan Ryan is still available, but seems to be asking for at least 10m a year. Seems fair, and would shore up a need with youngish player who has production, right?

 

[GShock]

Guys, guys, guys...

Logan Ryan is still available, but seems to be asking for at least 10m a year. Seems fair, and would shore up a need with youngish player who has production, right?

I don't think we are interested in paying double digit millions/year for [checks notes] anyone right now?

 

[Stasheroo]

Guys, guys, guys...

Logan Ryan is still available, but seems to be asking for at least 10m a year. Seems fair, and would shore up a need with youngish player who has production, right?

I would look into him, but they seem committed to going cheap.

 

[NoDak]

Just what this board needed. Another fucking delusional retard. Welcome, Idgit-lite.

 

[Simpleton]

Kind of OT, but I'm high on Connor McGovern still.

I think McGovern has at least a 40% shot at starting at LG over Williams this year, they'll definitely be in a camp battle to start.

 

[DontCryWolfe]

I think McGovern has at least a 40% shot at starting at LG over Williams this year, they'll definitely be in a camp battle to start.

You think Williams take over at swing? It’s the most logical fit. Hopefully two years with this group has got him ready to play LT when Tyron misses a game or two.

 

[Couchcoach]

Just wondering what these free agent signings mean for the draft?

 

[Simpleton]

You think Williams take over at swing? It’s the most logical fit. Hopefully two years with this group has got him ready to play LT when Tyron misses a game or two.

That'd make the most sense, we'll see if they draft someone they intend to be the swing tackle. Brandon Knight also seemed to be a staff favorite last year and was decent enough for about a half against the Packers when Collins went down, along with Smith who missed the game, so he's in the conversation as well.

 

[DontCryWolfe]

Just wondering what these free agent signings mean for the draft?

Based on the money handed out, i’m assuming not much. Though I certainly don’t agree with us not being more aggressive in FA, and there have been far too many guys who would have filled a need that signed elsewhere for decent money, we can still address any of those positions in the draft.

I know, not much of a silver lining, but I am trying.

 

[Stasheroo]

Just what this board needed. Another fucking delusional retard. Welcome, Idgit-lite.

 

[Stasheroo]

I think McGovern has at least a 40% shot at starting at LG over Williams this year, they'll definitely be in a camp battle to start.

I'm hopeful they make the switch and have Williams just focus on tackle from the jump. We now have two options in McGovern and Looney who are better suited to compete at LG in my opinion. Heck, I would even call Ron Leary about a return for vet minimum. But Williams at guard is a disservice to both he and the team in my opinion.

 

[Stasheroo]

You think Williams take over at swing? It’s the most logical fit. Hopefully two years with this group has got him ready to play LT when Tyron misses a game or two.

That's my hope.

 

[Stasheroo]

That'd make the most sense, we'll see if they draft someone they intend to be the swing tackle. Brandon Knight also seemed to be a staff favorite last year and was decent enough for about a half against the Packers when Collins went down, along with Smith who missed the game, so he's in the conversation as well.

I thought Knight did an admirable job against the Jets, all things considered. He was a pleasant surprise. And they liked Mitch Hyatt well enough to make him active rather than risking losing him.

 

[Cowboysrock55]

You think Williams take over at swing? It’s the most logical fit. Hopefully two years with this group has got him ready to play LT when Tyron misses a game or two.

Would make a ton of sense since we resigned our G/C backup and cut our swing tackle.