I was. But he's proven to be inconsistent, and too immature to be trusted. He has a better top gear. But frankly he is everything that people were afraid of. A guy who can hit it deep a few plays and is useless for the rest of the game. He had one really good half in Atlanta and his been useless otherwise, in the same half McFadden also performed well with his limited touches.
There isn't a big difference between the two, but if I have to choose I'm gonna pick the one who's less of a moron, and is more consistent. The Randle experiment was a complete failure and frankly once his time is up in Dallas, I'd be surprised to see him on another active roster.