Angrymesscan
DCC 4Life
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 3,796
Crowder in the later rounds
He's fast and a huge playmaker, though...Lockett is a great receiver and good punt returner. He would be a good replacement for Harris but he is smaller than I prefer.
He is listed at 5'11" so even if he is say 5'10" I'm ok with that. DeSean Jackson size doesn't bother me with a speed WR.Lockett is a great receiver and good punt returner. He would be a good replacement for Harris but he is smaller than I prefer.
Lippett is a real favorite of mine, very clutch.Dorsett for sure. I really love Agholor and Lippett, but they will go before I am willing to go WR. Guys like Christion Jones and Tyler Lockett...even Rashad Greene interests me.
He measured 5-9 today.He is listed at 5'11" so even if he is say 5'10" I'm ok with that. DeSean Jackson size doesn't bother me with a speed WR.
Crowder was getting Brandin Cooks comparisons from the draft Twitter people today. Not sure I buy that.I'd love Lockett, Crowder or Lippett in the mid-rounds.
I don't but he'd be a very nice 3rd or 4th rounder.Crowder was getting Brandin Cooks comparisons from the draft Twitter people today. Not sure I buy that.
That's more of what I thought. There is always a little cheating up going on with some of the smaller guys in college.He measured 5-9 today.
He is nothing compared to Ty Montgomery of Stanford.That's more of what I thought. There is always a little cheating up going on with some of the smaller guys in college.
Not really surprising to me. Basically the size of DeSean Jackson like I was saying. Doesn't scare me off any.That's more of what I thought. There is always a little cheating up going on with some of the smaller guys in college.
I bet Lockett doesn't come close to having Jackson's timed speed.Not really surprising to me. Basically the size of DeSean Jackson like I was saying. Doesn't scare me off any.
That's a safe bet. Jackson is freak fast. I don't think Lockett is slow by any means though and I think he has plenty of speed to beat people deep. If he ran a 40 like Jackson he would be in the discussion as a late first round pick.I bet Lockett doesn't come close to having Jackson's timed speed.
A slower Jackson is pretty much worthless. So why name drop?That's a safe bet. Jackson is freak fast. I don't think Lockett is slow by any means though and I think he has plenty of speed to beat people deep. If he ran a 40 like Jackson he would be in the discussion as a late first round pick.
Because everyone said that Jackson was too small to play in the NFL and he has lit it up...A slower Jackson is pretty much worthless. So why name drop?
Because the only thing I compared was their size. Not their skill set. And they both have basically identical size.Who said I hate him? I just think it is dumb to drop Jackson's name into it.
But what has made Jackson successful is his speed.Because the only thing I compared was their size. Not their skill set. And they both have basically identical size.
A lot of people doubted his ability to hold up in the NFL physically at his size. That's what I was speaking to. By the way, Lockett isn't slow by any means. He is quick and fast. I don't forsee him as a franchise WR though because he doesn't have freak speed like Jackson.But what has made Jackson successful is his speed.