Jiggyfly
Banned
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2013
- Messages
- 9,220
Not really.Lynch was solid, but it can be argued that Woodson was the GOAT at the position.
Not really.Lynch was solid, but it can be argued that Woodson was the GOAT at the position.
Not really.You probably can if you break them down into SS and FS.
Just my opinion, but you are crazy if you don't think Woodson belongs in the HOF.Not really.
SS that have been just as good if not better.
Ronnie Lott, Kenny Easley, Steve Atwater, Donnie Shell.
If Lynch is in consideration then I would take Woodson over him but I am not sure either belongs in the Hall.
You can still debate the issue. Which was the point.Not really.
SS that have been just as good if not better.
Ronnie Lott, Kenny Easley, Steve Atwater, Donnie Shell.
If Lynch is in consideration then I would take Woodson over him but I am not sure either belongs in the Hall.
Why am I crazy?Just my opinion, but you are crazy if you don't think Woodson belongs in the HOF.
Anybody else want to take this?Why am I crazy?
The point was if Woodson was GOAT as a safety and since you have to break it down to SS and FS to start a debate it kind of makes my case for me.You can still debate the issue. Which was the point.
You can do better than that Rev.Anybody else want to take this?
I said you could debate if you broke it down to SS/FS. I don't think he is the GOAT if you include all safeties but I do think you can debate it if you just take the SS position. I do think he belongs in the HOF and I sure as he'll believe he belongs there before a Lynch.The point was if Woodson was GOAT as a safety and since you have to break it down to SS and FS to start a debate it kind of makes my case for me.
And I think Lott and Shell where much better at SS.
I already stated that if Lynch gets in Woodson deserves it before him.I said you could debate if you broke it down to SS/FS. I don't think he is the GOAT if you include all safeties but I do think you can debate it if you just take the SS position. I do think he belongs in the HOF and I sure as he'll believe he belongs there before a Lynch.
I do not agree with any of this.Why am I crazy?
Woodson never was a game changing player, he was great at what he was asked to do but seldom was he the signature difference in winning a game.
IMO a HOF had to be a game changer or dominant at his position over a period of time IMO Woodson comes up short.
Anybody else want to take this?
I don't agree with any of this, either.The point was if Woodson was GOAT as a safety and since you have to break it down to SS and FS to start a debate it kind of makes my case for me.
And I think Lott and Shell where much better at SS.
SS and FS are two very different positions relative to how they are used on the field. I don't know how in the world one can't distinguish the two and grade them separately. Seems asinine to me.I said you could debate if you broke it down to SS/FS. I don't think he is the GOAT if you include all safeties but I do think you can debate it if you just take the SS position. I do think he belongs in the HOF and I sure as he'll believe he belongs there before a Lynch.