God I really hope not. We had cap room already to make a small QB move. I doubt we needed to restructure Scandrick to sign someone like Austin Davis for example. Which makes me sick thinking that we are bring in one of these veteran turds in a trade.
Making cap room for a backup QB?
We now have $8 mill in room. Just enough for Sanchez.God I really hope not. We had cap room already to make a small QB move. I doubt we needed to restructure Scandrick to sign someone like Austin Davis for example. Which makes me sick thinking that we are bring in one of these veteran turds in a trade.
That would be a rage in anger type move.We now have $8 mill in room. Just enough for Sanchez.
Oh, I agree it would be a stupid move. One I wouldn't put past this team.That would be a rage in anger type move.
But it would make little sense. Other teams like the Vikings now have a bigger need at QB. If they aren't moving for Sanchez, not sure why in the hell we would.
This is not true, the Patriots seldom give out this kind of information.Let me say it again. I agree that they shouldn't have to release any results, but teams talk about players having MRIs all. the. damn. time. It's never kept secret. Only the results sometimes are kept quiet. The actual tests rarely are if ever.
The fact that a player had an MRI is rarely not reported. Even by the Patriots. Period. Now, the results of tests may be withheld, but the test itself is not withheld very often.This is not true, the Patriots seldom give out this kind of information.
But since its Jerry and the Cowboys its an issue.
But Garrett still hasn't ruled out week 1.
It seems pretty obvious that he won't play. Does anyone actually think Garrett believes he will play week one? So who really cares what Garrett says about it then?But Garrett still hasn't ruled out week 1.
Yeah. Garrett is just trying to be coy in an attempt to confuse the Giants but they aren't confused. They know a rookie will start against them.It seems pretty obvious that he won't play. Does anyone actually think Garrett believes he will play week one? So who really cares what Garrett says about it then?
Yeah I guess it makes Garrett look a bit silly playing coy about something so obvious but it's not a big deal to me. Sort of like the MRI stuff, I want my organization giving out as little information as possible about injuries. That's what a smart organization would do anyway.Yeah. Garrett is just trying to be coy in an attempt to confuse the Giants but they aren't confused. They know a rookie will start against them.
Relax. Thought it was easily recognized for its intent.It seems pretty obvious that he won't play. Does anyone actually think Garrett believes he will play week one? So who really cares what Garrett says about it then?
That doesn't take Garrett into account does it?Just found this sort of interesting
7. Even after Tony Romo's injury, the Cowboys will be the most improved team in the NFL.
An updated look at FPI following news of Romo's injury shows the Cowboys' average win total at 7.6 games, which would be a 3.6-win increase from last season and the biggest uptick of any NFL team. As Bill Barnwell outlined, the Cowboys were one of the unluckiest teams in the NFL last season, and even without their No. 1 quarterback for most of the season, they have playmakers around Dak Prescott to remain competitive. FPI also gives the Cowboys the best odds of going from worst to first in their division. The reason? They have the third-easiest schedule in the NFL and play in a weak division.
Somebody can read minds....