dallen
Senior Tech
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2000
- Messages
- 8,466
Makes sense. If he didn't do it he got screwed over big timeLast I saw his agent was saying he was going to take care of his legal situation before signing anywhere
Makes sense. If he didn't do it he got screwed over big timeLast I saw his agent was saying he was going to take care of his legal situation before signing anywhere
So you are not one of those who thinks any RB can excel behind the Dallas OL?Actually the team as a whole is worse. Doing nothing to replace Murray means the running game will not, and I guarantee this, be as effective.
That bleeds down to Romo and also the defense. Sorry, but drafting a CB, getting a sub 250 lb. DE and signing Hardy for 6 games is not improving to the point they can be trusted to win ball games.
Yeah, wishing Dallas suck to see me react is like awesome and stuff.It's almost worth it to see Joseph Randle starting and the reaction Booze will have to it.
Oh no, I hope Randle is probowl good. I think that would bother you way more.Yeah, wishing Dallas suck to see me react is like awesome and stuff.
I don't know anything about him myself, but I've been reading that when he signed on at Perdue, they were a 4-3 team, and he looked pretty good his freshman year. Then they switched to the 3-4 and he's been playing out of position ever since. I know it's a long shot, but maybe he has something that Marinelli and Lett can work with.I actually like our draft until that fifth rounder. What the hell was with the Ryan Russell pick. Do we even have space on the roster for another DE? And if we do why are we using a pick on a guy who basically could't do anything in college. Has like 8 sacks in college as a DE.
I hope but I wouldn't be surprised if he doesn't make our roster at all. Hell I wouldn't be surprised all of our 5th and 7th round picks don't make the roster.I don't know anything about him myself, but I've been reading that when he signed on at Perdue, they were a 4-3 team, and he looked pretty good his freshman year. Then they switched to the 3-4 and he's been playing out of position ever since. I know it's a long shot, but maybe he has something that Marinelli and Lett can work with.
It's crazy, the guy was a top 15 draft pick a couple weeks ago. You have to wonder how hard teams were scrambling to find out about the case. I'd almost say there was a touch of collusion going on with no NFL team selecting him. You would have thought someone would have tossed a 7th out there to lock up his rights in case he didn't do it. Instead its like all the NFL teams decided together not to draft the guy as a way to protect the NFL's imagine in case he gets charged with murder.I would take a chance will La'll Collins now though, if they can!
This makes no sense whatsoever.Actually the team as a whole is worse. Doing nothing to replace Murray means the running game will not, and I guarantee this, be as effective.
That bleeds down to Romo and also the defense. Sorry, but drafting a CB, getting a sub 250 lb. DE and signing Hardy for 6 games is not improving to the point they can be trusted to win ball games.
The only position this team downgraded was RB. Every other position on the team is either the same or better in my opinion. The secondary is better. The D-line is way better. LBer is better. O-line is the same (Maybe slightly improved as the young guys get better). QB is the same. WR is the same.This makes no sense whatsoever.
If the defense is improved (which it is) there is not the same need for keep away and it stands to reason the offense will get more opportunities because the defense is better.
Nobody thinks Hardy is going to be out 10 games so you are using a worse case scenario to project doom and gloom and even if he is you have Lawrence in his 2nd year and hopefully for the full season along with Gregory.
The LB's are upgraded with the return of Lee and McClain with a full offseason and Hitchens in his 2nd year not to mention the depth is much better.
The offense has more than enough weapons to compensate for the loss of Murray might not be top 3 like last year but with the defense getting better it will not have to be.
D tackle is a position we've downgraded at least a little. I would have felt way better if Baltimore hasn't stolen David from under our noses. But I think any objective evaluation of this team will find our upgrades on defense to be more significant than the loss of Murray.The only position this team downgraded was RB. Every other position on the team is either the same or better in my opinion. The secondary is better. The D-line is way better. LBer is better. O-line is the same (Maybe slightly improved as the young guys get better). QB is the same. WR is the same.
The only position anyone can bitch about is RB. No question that position is worse. Hell we could have resigned Murray and I'd say the position was going to be worse. I bet we still have a top 5 rushing offense next year though.
I kind of forget about Melton because in the second half of the season he did nothing for us. But I guess we did lose him from last year. Of course you could argue a full season with Brent sort of makes up for that. Ultimately we did did lose a backup 3 technique and god Bennett would have been a perfect replacement. I have no idea why he fell so far.D tackle is a position we've downgraded at least a little. I would have felt way better if Baltimore hasn't stolen David from under our noses. But I think any objective evaluation of this team will find our upgrades on defense to be more significant than the loss of Murray.
Absolutely correct.The only position this team downgraded was RB. Every other position on the team is either the same or better in my opinion. The secondary is better. The D-line is way better. LBer is better. O-line is the same (Maybe slightly improved as the young guys get better). QB is the same. WR is the same.
The only position anyone can bitch about is RB. No question that position is worse. Hell we could have resigned Murray and I'd say the position was going to be worse. I bet we still have a top 5 rushing offense next year though.
A resounding NO.The true measure of any sports front office is did you use the off-season to improve your roster. Are the Cowboys a better team this year than they were last year? The answer is a resounding NO.
They are only upgraded for the games they actually play and you could even say if McClain actually plays as well as did the first part of the year.The LB's are upgraded with the return of Lee and McClain