I'd much rather stood at 18 and took Eifert.
There's no way he goes first round now."
He is actually a bit of a mauler. Something we desperately needed on the O-line. Weather he starts at center or RG he instantly is an upgrade to the O-line. With a second and two third we have a shot to build a pretty strong draft. Some excellent safeties are left that could step in and start and certainly some D-lineman to build some youth there.Grades on him are 2nd and high 3rd mostly citing he's slow as shit and ran a terrible 40 at combine. WGAS how fast our center is? Only thing is we could've got him with our second probably.
I love the sign. "Can we trade our picks for a new GM?"
Who's MIA on the board tonight, and are they in NY right now?
Frederick was a solid second rounder. I don't think he was one of those "first guys off the board in the second" players, necessarily.It depends on who you read the info from. A lot of folks had him as a 2nd rounder, so it's not a bad pick at all. Especially given the weird run on o-linemen.
It's not worth it if he could be had in the 2nd and we passed on first round talent in the first.If Frederick beats out Costa or one of the terrible Guards then the pick is worth it. Not the best move but with Jerry picking you have to take what you can get.
Gay.I'm pretty much done with this team.
I'm guessing we didn't have any first round talent left on our board.It's not worth it if he could be had in the 2nd and we passed on first round talent in the first.
Not the guy I had pegged, but get Warford at 47 and gets better. Frederick will start for sure.Wahhh Non-scouts think he's a 2nd or 3rd rounder. Boo hoo
very nice player, huge need, you all will be sucking his crank when he blows up London Fletcher in the run game.
What "1st round talent" did we pass on for him? They only had 17 graded as such.It's not worth it if he could be had in the 2nd and we passed on first round talent in the first.