- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 19,525
Johnny Manziel was in that Pic and who cares?????
Johnny Manziel was in that Pic and who cares?????
I will I promise, I'll even throw the remains to my ever growing mastiffWell, if you're truly a man of your word and not just regurgitating boring and over played rhetoric, I hope we do trade up for him.
I fucking hate cats.
I have said this before. I would not take Barr at 16. Don't trust him. He totally disappeared in a couple of UCLA games I watched. Not sure what his skill set is.
The best prospect in the PAC 12 remains WR Lee. To me he is better than Watkins or Evans. I think he is an elite player. He has better acceleration out of his routes than anyone else in this draft. Gets more separation quicker, runs better routes; great radius and hustles non stop on every play.
QB's I distrust. All of them, but especially Derek Carr; he is horrible under pressure. I'd look at a QB in round 3-4 maybe; but not in round 1 this year.
There are a ton of good WR's this, but of the 2nd round talents I like, Adams is still top. Down the road, he looks like a #1.
Don't know much about the lines, though, Filo is interesting in second.
Just please no DE at 16, there is no one. Actually other than the Clemson person, I wouldn't touch a DE in first. If Donald is gone, same thing with DT's.
Yea, I'm still kind of confused as to who the "Clemson person" is.
He means Clowney. He can't tell the difference between Clemson and South Carolina when he's that drunk.Yea, I'm still kind of confused as to who the "Clemson person" is.
He won't be there in the 2nd, I'd guess.I think I like Easley as a better prospect than Shariff Floyd last year. He's absurdly disruptive in the backfield in the highlights, only problem is his previous injuries. Seems like a standard second round pick we make, and I'd be fine with it
What do we get for making that move?I am starting to look at the #26 from Clev...they go Watkins, Mack, or Clowney at 4 and move up to 16 to get Carr.
I'd rather just take Carr if he's there.I am starting to look at the #26 from Clev...they go Watkins, Mack, or Clowney at 4 and move up to 16 to get Carr.
A late 2nd-early 3rd usually but going by our new super-secret trade value chart probably a 4thWhat do we get for making that move?
Jerry would sooner overcharge and kill the trade than look like he got robbed while trading down.A late 2nd-early 3rd usually but going by our new super-secret trade value chart probably a 4th
Sarcasm?Jerry would sooner overcharge and kill the trade than look like he got robbed while trading down.
No. When Jerry gets robbed he's usually overpaying for something he's fallen in love with, like an overrated WR. The trade down last year was for a high third, not a fourth. I don't know why you'd expect him to take less when he JUST negotiated for exactly what [MENTION=141]jsmith6919[/MENTION] said we should get for that trade down.Sarcasm?
We wouldn't be trading down as far as last year hence the 4th instead of a 3rd( though I do think we get better value this year if we trade down, if nothing else Jerry is reactionary)No. When Jerry gets robbed he's usually overpaying for something he's fallen in love with, like an overrated WR. The trade down last year was for a high third, not a fourth. I don't know why you'd expect him to take less when he JUST negotiated for exactly what [MENTION=141]jsmith6919[/MENTION] said we should get for that trade down.
I'd guess pick 71. I just can't see Clev giving their 2nd.What do we get for making that move?