Search results

If you look at Green Bay's roster construction they've invested heavily on the defensive side and not so much on the offensive side. In the past 5ish years they've spent 1's on Devonte Wyatt, Quay Walker, Rashad Gary, Lukas Van Ness, and now two future 1's on Parsons. Offensively they mostly...

Maybe but he wasn't that key for us, one way or the other.

Yea I mean that conundrum is one of the reasons I was fine trading him. I also don't think Green Bay is actually that stacked, they just look like it right now because these first two games have gone exactly to script. I think their offense in particular is going to start showing cracks as the...

What he should've always been, although I have my doubts that they'll have the discipline to keep limiting his snaps like this.

Probably so, I think they're probably a lock to win the division with the Lions looking like they're going to drop back.

They aren't wasting him on clear run downs either. But they've also jumped out to 2 TD leads quickly in both of these first two games, Parsons is going to look amazing in that scenario no matter what is going on around him.

Think Ekeler popped an Achilles, between that and their starting DE Wise popping an ACL on a XP, pretty good laughs all around.

Daniels is also kind of a garbage time king, they have 150 yards right now, I wouldn't be shocked if they ended up with 275+.

Their defense is similar to what we had under Quinn except much less talented. When they're up big they feast because of the aggressive nature, against quality opponents and in games that are neutral they struggle. They were up big a lot last year because they had like 7 games against the worst...

Exhibit 10596 why it's hard to take these games too seriously.

Two guys 30+, one of which in Deebo who was never truly an elite WR to begin with. And yes, they were extremely, even historically lucky last year.

Sit him until Green Bay, I don't think we really need him with Wilson and then dumbo Williams the week after.

Piece of absolute shit Sanders.

Could also just be random since it's seemingly not that serious of an injury.

It'd be nice to have Diggs and Bland together for more than 2 games at a fucking time.

Meh, I think they're more or less the same player at this stage. Jumbo edge setters who are past their prime but can provide some value as part of a rotation. Neither are needle movers though, and it's pretty telling that the Eagles are seemingly going to rely on Smith as their 2nd edge rusher.

Most of them aren't great against the run and Clowney provides a physical edge-setting presence. I think Kneeland is very legit vs. the run, and Williams is seemingly fine, but Fowler, Ezeiruaku and Houston are all relatively undersized and better rushing the passer. So from that perspective I...

If you mean a 8ish win team that could maybe get to 10 with a little luck, sure, but they aren't actually good. I think it's more like people just assume they're going to be a 6ish win team but they're actually closer to average to above average than most think.

Why not? I don't think he has a whole lot of pass rush juice left but I'm fairly certain he can still set the edge comfortably, while providing a bit of complementary pass rush with his power to constrict the pocket.

This is one of the first things I noted in my very long post after going through a bunch of Clark's all-22.