Search results

I agree with your overall point but the teams we had in 2014, 2016 and between 2021-23 were at least as good, if not better in some instances than the 2006 and 2007 teams Parcells built.

2025 NFL Draft confidential: Woe is the team in need of a quarterback this year Bruce Feldman If you’re an NFL defensive line coach, you love the 2025 NFL Draft. Two pro defensive line coaches I spoke to in the past week said they think there are at least a dozen legitimate first-round talents...

I don't think there's any chance we take Grant but I think he's pretty solidly a better prospect than Mazi. Mazi was a guy expected to go about 25-35, whereas Grant looks like a 15-25 guy to me. His statistical production alone is significantly better than Mazi with 12 TFL and 6.5 sacks his...

I don't want to spend the 12th pick on a DT who is very questionable against the run. Nolen is a guy who is extremely explosive but everything is about getting upfield, and there are a bunch of times where he gets washed out when trying to hold the POA without splitting blocks to penetrate as...

Yea, it's Warren, Harmon or Grant for me. Stewart and Williams are guys I'd consider after a trade down.

We were in the playoffs 3 of the last 4 years, that was kind of exciting although I think most of us just sit around waiting for the other shoe to drop these days unfortunately. The draft is definitely one of the most exciting times of the year though.

Yea it's way too early to start talking about moving on from Guyton. If he doesn't look at all improved this year, sure, but right now he could just as easily be our starting LT for the next 5-7 years as he could be a bust that's gone in 2. And even then I think you'd have to consider shifting...

Would be nice if Banks goes in front of us.

I agree, I wouldn't want to take someone like Banks at 12, has to be after a trade down.

It's certainly not my first choice but I really like Booker, Zabel and even Donovan Jackson as interior OL prospects. If we can add a 2, or a 3/4 or something along those lines while moving back to about 20-22 and adding Booker or Zabel while giving us a bunch of ammunition to address RB, DL...

If we move down to about 20 I don't think it would be that bad. Egbuka, Harmon or Grant would be ideal but I'd be perfectly fine with Booker or Zabel in that range. Seems like an interesting topic for tomorrow's podcast.

If we're talking OL in the first the last thing I'd be interested in is a guy who is OT-only. Campbell or Membou drops? Great there's your RG next year and maybe a future OT. Trade down and take someone like Banks, Booker or Zabel? Sure, but someone like Simmons is the last thing I think we...

They might be mostly out on Steele and are thinking about shifting Guyton to RT with Simmons at LT. But that seems kind of unlikely and I don't love burning a 1 on a guy who might not even play as a rookie because he might replace a starter a year from now.

Harris was also adamant that Schottenheimer wouldn't be the HC, so there's that.

Not interested unless the board is completely barren. If he were a no brainer BPA that's one thing, but he's not and he's coming off a serious injury. On top of that, what exactly are we going to do with Guyton, Steele and Simmons next year, none of whom can play inside?

Bipo was definitely obsessed with him, I think he wanted Jones and Spears with the two 1's.

I really like Mbow in that range but not when you have DL talent available like TJ Sanders, Kyle Kennard and Omar Norman-Lott. Going offense in the first 3 rounds unless they're all no-brainer, clear BPA types would be pretty questionable.

That's a decent class but I don't know what this guys obsession is with giving us an interior OL in the first few rounds.

Yea I think he's a better prospect than McMillan or Golden, the question though is whether or not he's so much better of a prospect that you should take him over a closely ranked guy who plays a more impactful position that is a much greater need? I don't have a strong answer on it but I'm...

Always has been in my mind.