Search results

If they're 4-7 or something at the deadline they might do it. Given his age I wouldn't give up more than a 2, but he's still going to be a really good player for probably another 3ish years, kind of like Kenny Clark.

Yea I'd do a 3 for him depending on the contract, not sure I'd do a 2, but maybe.

I think that was nearly the case in the second half.

The special teams were also quietly terrible outside of Aubrey's singular excellence.

I'm rewatching the game and Steele is somehow worse than I remembered. Guyton has his issues and got beat his fair share but Steele is just on another level. He gave up about 4 quick pressures/sacks just on the last 3-4 drives alone, including on the first play of the second possession in OT...

This is what I mentioned earlier, I bet they're banking on him coming back.

One of the two chucklefucks running the team said Bland might play this week either earlier today or yesterday, so maybe they're banking on that.

The Giants have top 3-5 pass rush talent in the league too, so there's that.

I think Guyton is better than, or at least equal to Steele right now. There's no world where benching Guyton makes sense. You might be able to talk me into moving him to RT with Thomas playing LT, but it'd probably be best to just leave Guyton where he is and roll the dice with Thomas at RT.

I think there's an argument that we should start him over Steele. I'm just not sure what his comfort level is at RT, he played mostly LT in college and seemingly played there for the most part in training camp. If he's just as comfortable at RT as LT there's definitely an argument.

Our defense was significantly worse for longer last year and ended up being pretty solid in the second half of the year. If they're still playing like shit in late October then I'll agree that Eberflus needs to go.

And what I'm saying is the Chargers OL is not any more talented, if anything all you're seeing is better scheme that is putting a premium on running the ball and protecting the QB with max protections and play action, but that's on coaching and not the actual players on the field. Pipkins is an...

Meh, I'll give it a few more weeks, I think the front 7 is mostly fine. Definitely average aside from the DT's (and without Overshown) but not God awful like the secondary was.

Disagree as far as the OL goes, ours is at least equal and maybe better. They obviously built their DL with a bunch of 2-gapping run-stuffers though, so I agree there.

I wanted Minter to be in consideration for our HC spot but there's no way a guy like him would succeed in the circus here, he's a big part of how good their defense is. I don't think they're significantly more talented than our group overall but they're really well coached.

Yea, when I think of the elite WR's during the time Evans was in the league he's just a tier below. From the early part of his career Julio Jones was a clear tier above to me, Fitzgerald of course, Antonio Brown before he lost his mind, and I think even DeAndre Hopkins was better. Then from...

He's basically just a very good compiler. Based on previous precedent he should probably be in after waiting for like 15 years, especially since he has a Super Bowl on top of the pure stats, but he was never a top 3 WR in the league at any point in his career.

The Raiders defensive personnel seems very average but they're flying around like crazy.

Can someone explain to me how in the fuck Tom Brady is in the coaching box for a team he's part owner of, including having conversations with their coaching staff multiple times a week, all while he's getting information from the teams he's doing games of each week on their game plans...

He's the guy I'm actually worried about. Diggs is meh but I think still passable, Bland is good, I think Hooker and Wilson will be fine, but Elam looks like absolute shit. Once Bland is back I'd roll with Diggs/Bland/Steward honestly, and then if Revel can play at any point go with Diggs/Revel...