- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 23,455
I think he is saying that Sewell is only a Tackle and that the other 2 can play both. Saying it might be better to pick they versatile one.I don’t understand the relevance of Galko’s perspective.
I think he is saying that Sewell is only a Tackle and that the other 2 can play both. Saying it might be better to pick they versatile one.I don’t understand the relevance of Galko’s perspective.
Yeah really stupid take. WGAS about versatility at the top of the draft. You're picking the guy to start.I think he is saying that Sewell is only a Tackle and that the other 2 can play both. Saying it might be better to pick they versatile one.
It's stupid.I don’t understand the relevance of Galko’s perspective.
Drives me nuts to here about versatility in the first. Besides if the guy is a stud LT I'm sure he is more than capable to play guard. Might not have the tape at guard but who cares.It's stupid.
LT is the elite position on the line.
Who gives a shit if one guy can play all the other 4 positions. He can't play them all at the same time and he isn't gonna have nearly the impact an elite LT would.
GTFO with that silliness.
One of the dumbest takes I've ever seen about anything.
Galko and Charles Davis are speaking to the same insider.
That would be silly, especially considering Tyron's injury history.Because of guard flexibility, Cowboys draft Slater over Sewell
I have a feeling if the two corners aren't there, they are bailing with the quickness and will attack the position with volume. I just don't think they are into spending a top ten pick on one of the tackles.
I mean I want to attack the defense with lots of numbers. But I also don't want a bunch of defenders who are mediocre at the cost of a franchise LT.I have a feeling if the two corners aren't there, they are bailing with the quickness and will attack the position with volume. I just don't think they are into spending a top ten pick on one of the tackles.
If they are willing to take Chase, why not Pitts?I don’t believe ATL drafting Pitts #4. Worst case scenario, Atlanta can’t get a fourth rounder from the Dolphins to drop to #6 and still get Pitts?
Bengals for sure ain’t taking Pitts at #5.
Bengals for sure ain’t taking Pitts at #5.