- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 136,935
You are so used to believing the Eagles are a well run outfit that you are conditioned to misread alerts.Awww shit guess I misread that alert.
You are so used to believing the Eagles are a well run outfit that you are conditioned to misread alerts.Awww shit guess I misread that alert.
If they are sticking with Garropolo, then I think it is Lance. He is the one who would benefit by sitting.It's going to be all about preference. I could see Lance in that group as well. Something tells me it's for Fields though. He has a lot of physical gifts, production at a top level and to me that's sort of the obvious guy. He checks a lot of the boxes for what they would want in my opinion.
there's 6 of 9. Seems pretty easy to determine who will be there at 10 for us to choose from.
let the speculation run amok!
This would be a great approach if you were winning Super Bowls.They are tricking the system! Sign them cheap, get great play, reap benefits of comp picks! But yeah, we don't use free agency the way most teams do. We have progressively gotten worse at free agency it seems.
Well he did say Pitts could kick field goals from his own 30. Boom! The Kicker/TESo, nobody else could be the 5th option in this offense?
Sign me up!
Oh, Jesus Christ, Smitty.On the back of an excellent Wentz MVP-caliber season until he got hurt.
Can you imagine how pissed Niners fans would be if the team 2 firsts and a third for something other than a QB?Who are the 49ers after at 3? They say they are keeping Jimmy G.
He would also need to punt.Well he did say Pitts could kick field goals from his own 30. Boom! The Kicker/TE
let the speculation run amok!
This dude is a moron.
No, I still wouldn't take a kicker that could do that.
Is he Witten Part Deux?No, I still wouldn't take a kicker that could do that.
That said, I do think Pitts is a generational-type. Far more than guys like Sewell or Slater.
I hesitate to say anybody will be a HOF'er but I think he's the surest bet to be a HOF'er in this class and that includes Lawrence. Sewell and Lawrence are the only guys I'd even consider including in the argument.Is he Witten Part Deux?
Wasn't Winslow Jr supposed to be one?No, I still wouldn't take a kicker that could do that.
That said, I do think Pitts is a generational-type. Far more than guys like Sewell or Slater.
He was good. But Pitts is several levels above.Wasn't Winslow Jr supposed to be one?