Smitty
DCC 4Life
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 24,519
The deliberately unspoken angle on the majority of these cases is that the black victims - in your own words - feel empowered or entitled to resist arrest.Animal?
Hardly. And using that kind of characterization is exactly what fuels shit like this.
The guy was not an animal. He was a dumbass.
He was drunk, he fell asleep in the drive thru. He could have just take his DUI and dealt with it.
Instead, he felt empowered to resist arrest and try to run off like a moron, plus grab a tazer. And use it.
That's the real problem here. It is like there is no thought to someone being a dumbass.
There is a real desire to minimize accountability and this is the latest example.
Do I think he should have been shot in the back? No.
But it is not like this "shoot them in the leg" thing really is possible.
I’m so tired of hearing that they do this because they are afraid of the police killing them. There isn’t even anecdotal evidence that supports this fear, because very few of the incidents occur when the arrested person submits to the police as directed. Even if you are thinking of the few where a complying detainee was still killed, those incidents are dwarfed by the increased chances of you being shot when you do resist. Once the police have made contact with you and intend to attempt an arrest, the resisting outcome is way, WAY more likely to get you killed than the submitting outcome. There’s simply no arguing against that, period.
What they are really afraid of, though, is jail, and so they run. And like most criminals, the consequences of their actions rarely runs through their heads when they choose to engage in their criminality.
