Smitty
DCC 4Life
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 24,102
Just rip the bandaid off already Jerry.
Just rip the bandaid off already Jerry.
Holy shit.
It's fucking pathetic. Have some pride, ffs.Holy shit.
Just announce it and make it official. That should put an end to it.
Jesus christ in a body cast if that doesn't tell you all you need to know about Garrett nothing will. You had 10 years dude. It's not me, it's you.
Your Jesus Christ comments always make meJesus christ in a body cast
I will join you just as soon as I know he is no longer with the organization in any capacity.Fuck it. I'm celebrating.
![]()
Yeah me too. I do however, wonder why Glazer didn’t indicate he had a source for what he said.Glazer is as solid as it comes, I'll take anything he says over your opinion
You don't know how an insider with strong credibility remains that way, do you?Yeah me too. I do however, wonder why Glazer didn’t indicate he had a source for what he said.
Glazer has never been wrong that I can remember, even when he scooped the NYG were trading OBJ and everyone else said it wasn't happeningYeah me too. I do however, wonder why Glazer didn’t indicate he had a source for what he said.
You are celebrating based off a Mike Lombardi tweet who is almost always wrong.Fuck it. I'm celebrating.
![]()
No I guess not.You don't know how an insider with strong credibility remains that way, do you?
Rule number 1 in maintaining your sources and hence your credibility, never reveal your sources.No I guess not.
So that’s why he didn’t reveal his sources for his comments. So he can maintain his credibility with his sources and not have to reveal his source and in this manner no one will ever know if his source or maybe non source is credible. That’s a pretty good side step arrangement. Now it makes me wonder who at the Star is close enough to know Garrett is still begging for his job. Hmmmmmm.Rule number 1 in maintaining your sources and hence your credibility, never reveal your sources.
Jay Glazer is pretty much spot on.So that’s why he didn’t reveal his sources for his comments. So he can maintain his credibility with his sources and not have to reveal his source and in this manner no one will ever know if his source or maybe non source is credible. That’s a pretty good side step arrangement. Now it makes me wonder who at the Star is close enough to know Garrett is still begging for his job. Hmmmmmm.
I still don’t buy the story that Garrett is still lobbying for his job with candidates being interviewed at the same time. Now is that a credible scenario?
No. Glazer said it, I believe him over you.So that’s why he didn’t reveal his sources for his comments. So he can maintain his credibility with his sources and not have to reveal his source and in this manner no one will ever know if his source or maybe non source is credible. That’s a pretty good side step arrangement. Now it makes me wonder who at the Star is close enough to know Garrett is still begging for his job. Hmmmmmm.
I still don’t buy the story that Garrett is still lobbying for his job with candidates being interviewed at the same time. Now is that a credible scenario?
It's pretty common practice. Like common with every single sports reporter in the history of forever.So that’s why he didn’t reveal his sources for his comments. So he can maintain his credibility with his sources and not have to reveal his source and in this manner no one will ever know if his source or maybe non source is credible. That’s a pretty good side step arrangement.
Not asking you to believe him over me. I am asking does it sound credible. My opinion is no.No. Glazer said it, I believe him over you.
So you think Garrett is still lobbying for his job even though they are interviewing other candidates?Jay Glazer is pretty much spot on.
Do you think someone with as much credibility as he has would throw it all away over this? My opinion is no.Not asking you to believe him over me. I am asking does it sound credible. My opinion is no.
YesSo you think Garrett is still lobbying for his job even though they are interviewing other candidates?