Draft Grades

boozeman

28 Years And Counting...
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
122,810
Kiper's grade -



Dallas Cowboys: C+
Top needs: CB, RB, DT, S

It's now two straight years we've seen the Cowboys drive the suspense factor and end up not picking a player at the position everyone is talking about. Last year, it was passing on a QB and Johnny Manziel. This year, it was passing on a running back after the departure of Demarco Murray. They again targeted a player in Round 1 who they think can help make them better in a need area right away. Last year, it was Zack Martin on the O-line; this year, it was Byron Jones in the secondary. The versatile, athletic freak from Connecticut could play all over for them. He helps. Randy Gregory is the big story. Gregory is a gifted pass-rusher with top-5 ability, but Dallas is rolling the dice at No. 60 and believing Rod Marinelli can help a kid who has off-field issues that threaten to derail his career. If it works out, that's an impact player. Chaz Green was a pretty massive reach on my board, but I did like Damien Wilson in Round 4. If health issues again hurt them in the linebacking corps, Wilson is great insurance. As to the big question mark, which was not selecting a running back, my sense is the Cowboys know there are many backs who will run effectively behind their offensive line, and you can add one on the cheap pretty easily. The depth chart there just really isn't that bad. Jones is the safe bet, and Gregory the potential home run. From there, we'll see.
 

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
37,845
I think C+ is fair. This is a proverbial boom or bust draft. If Jones and Gregory work out, this was probably a home run, because probably a couple of the other guys will at least contribute. But I could also see in 3 years people saying there's like 1 guy left on the roster from this.
 

Angrymesscan

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
3,796
I think C+ is fair. This is a proverbial boom or bust draft. If Jones and Gregory work out, this was probably a home run, because probably a couple of the other guys will at least contribute. But I could also see in 3 years people saying there's like 1 guy left on the roster from this.
And a backup at that...
 

boozeman

28 Years And Counting...
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
122,810
Rotoworld (Evan Silva)

Dallas Cowboys

27. Connecticut DB Byron Jones
60. Nebraska DE Randy Gregory
91. Florida T/G Chaz Green
127. Minnesota ILB Damien Wilson
163. Purdue DE Ryan Russell
236. Wyoming LB Mark Nzeocha
243. Virginia Tech OT Laurence Gibson
246. Texas TE Geoff Swaim

Overview: Only time, of course, can tell how these players will pan out. I think it's worth noting that the Cowboys' draft heavily emphasized athleticism. Every single player here can be described as an above-average athlete for their size, while Jones, Gregory, Wilson, Russell, Nzeocha, and Gibson are all legitimate top-shelf movers. I think Dallas stole Jones and Gregory at their draft slots, before reaching a bit on Green. Wilson and Russell have starting potential down the road. On day three, the Cowboys sent a 2016 sixth-round pick to the 49ers in exchange for the pick used on Swaim, a proficient college blocker with tools-based upside. Like most everyone else, I wanted to see the Cowboys draft a running back. They repeatedly passed on the opportunity to select Boise State RB Jay Ajayi. Without a quality back currently on the roster, I'm skeptical Dallas will be able to continue playing "keepaway" at the dominant clip they did last season. With that said, I definitely think their roster improved with this draft.
 

boozeman

28 Years And Counting...
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
122,810
CBSSportline (Rob Rang)

Dallas Cowboys: At least on paper, perhaps no team found a better fit late in the first round than the Cowboys, who filled arguably their two biggest needs - cornerback depth and locker room leader - with the selection of Byron Jones. Leadership could be required, however, as the club made a risky pick with Randy Gregory next. Gregory boasts top 10 talent and gives Dallas a potentially frightening trio of edge rushers with Greg Hardy and second-year pro Demarcus Lawrence, but Gregory's slide wasn't by accident. While Gregory's addition was all about winning immediately, I like the developmental upside of young tackles Chaz Green and Laurence Gipson, as well as the instincts and closing speed of linebacker Damien Wilson.
Grade: B-
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
52,953
On day three, the Cowboys sent a 2016 sixth-round pick to the 49ers in exchange for the pick used on Swaim, a proficient college blocker with tools-based upside. Like most everyone else, I wanted to see the Cowboys draft a running back. They repeatedly passed on the opportunity to select Boise State RB Jay Ajayi. Without a quality back currently on the roster, I'm skeptical Dallas will be able to continue playing "keepaway" at the dominant clip they did last season. With that said, I definitely think their roster improved with this draft.
What the hell was this? I guess our comp picks next year will make up for it but we seriously needed to sacrifice a future sixth rounder for a fourth string TE? If he makes the roster.
 

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
37,845
What the hell was this? I guess our comp picks next year will make up for it but we seriously needed to sacrifice a future sixth rounder for a fourth string TE? If he makes the roster.
That was simply retarded. I can see why they want a blocking TE, and I can see Hanna being the odd man out. But it's not exactly hard to find. It's ridiculous to waste an extra 6th on it.
 

NoDak

Hotlinking' sonofabitch
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
23,210
That was simply retarded. I can see why they want a blocking TE, and I can see Hanna being the odd man out. But it's not exactly hard to find. It's ridiculous to waste an extra 6th on it.
If he makes the team and contributes, I don't care about the 6th rounder. We only used next years 6th, in reality. We didn't have the 7th used on him originally. So it's not like we used an 'extra' pick on him.

If he makes the team...
 

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
37,845
If he makes the team and contributes, I don't care about the 6th rounder. We only used next years 6th, in reality. We didn't have the 7th used on him originally. So it's not like we used an 'extra' pick on him.

If he makes the team...
Basically we spent a 6th rounder on a blocking TE when we could've gotten, if not him, a similar player as a UDFA. That's not good value. We stood to get a better player in next year's 6th.

The best defense of this is we'll probably get comp picks to make up for it next year. But I fail to see why that means we should be throwing picks away for no value.
 

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,700
That was simply retarded. I can see why they want a blocking TE, and I can see Hanna being the odd man out. But it's not exactly hard to find. It's ridiculous to waste an extra 6th on it.
It an attempt to hedge their bet on the RB decision. Simple as that.
 

NoDak

Hotlinking' sonofabitch
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
23,210
Basically we spent a 6th rounder on a blocking TE when we could've gotten, if not him, a similar player as a UDFA. That's not good value. We stood to get a better player in next year's 6th.

The best defense of this is we'll probably get comp picks to make up for it next year. But I fail to see why that means we should be throwing picks away for no value.
There is no way we as fans can know that, so I see no point in holding any weight in conjecture. Clearly the team placed more value in him then somebody they could have got as a UDFA. Were they right? Who knows. Just like we have no idea if they are 'throwing picks away for no value' just because they didn't take who we think they should have.
 

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
37,845
Had we done something like trade down in the 3rd, we may have still gotten Green and maybe picked up an earlier 5th and taken Ajayi. And the draft for me would have been much more palatable.

It's hard to fathom that we went through one of the deepest running back drafts in years and didn't come away with a running back despite needing one pretty badly.
 

townsend

Banned
Joined
Apr 11, 2013
Messages
5,377
I feel like we came into the draft a 7-9 team, now we're a 10-6 team.
 

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
37,845
There is no way we as fans can know that, so I see no point in holding any weight in conjecture. Clearly the team placed more value in him then somebody they could have got as a UDFA. Were they right? Who knows. Just like we have no idea if they are 'throwing picks away for no value' just because they didn't take who we think they should have.
It's not about them taking who I think they should've. It's about applying logic to the situation. There's no reason at all we as fans can't use logic to evaluate what a team does.

Notice I said nothing about the specific player they got? It's not about that. It's about optimizing resources. This is at best a 3rd string blocking TE. The payoff, even if he works out, isn't worth the cost, because you can find those types under rocks. You don't have to evaluate every player on the planet or be a scout to recognize when the team isn't getting 4 quarters for a dollar.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
52,953
It's hard to fathom that we went through one of the deepest running back drafts in years and didn't come away with a running back despite needing one pretty badly.
This is where the Cowboys organization clearly disagrees. I wanted a RB too but clearly the Cowboys think far more highly of the guys they have on the roster then us fans do. When they talked Randle up as being a similar player to Murray last year I guess they weren't joking.

I can see how the RBs didn't fall to make us feel like it was a must have at any of our draft picks. Well except for maybe Ajayi but there is something way more to his story then just pure talent. Obviously if the team really felt like RB was a must have we could have traded up to get the RB we wanted though at any point. I wouldn't have cared if we sacrificed the dude we took in the fifth in the process either.
 

Jiggyfly

Banned
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
9,220
Dallas Cowboys Blog

Sturm’s Morning After Draft Day 2: Why Cowboys get an A+

Bob Sturm Follow @sportssturm Email sturm1310@me.com
Published: May 2, 2015 8:28 am

On the morning after, when we are trying to read the minds of NFL decision makers, or in this case, specifically the Dallas Cowboys’ minds when they went through the process of selecting their first 3 choices in the 2015 draft, there is room for speculation and flat-out guess work.


Yesterday, when writing about the Cowboys selection of Byron Jones over Randy Gregory at #27 of the 1st round, I tried to explain the situation as best as I could:

Gregory, as I said a few months back, is not an ideal fit on the Cowboys due to his size (235) and you would have been trying to figure out how to play him without being attacked on the ground. This is why I always liked Shane Ray more than Gregory for Dallas and see Gregory as an edge in a 3-4 more than a DE in 4-3. Ray would have been fine at left defensive end and complimented DeMarcus Lawrence well with his stout frame. Gregory was a bit redundant and I wonder if that chased them off the idea.”

They took the best corner on their board instead of a real impressive pass rusher, because in my estimation, the fit wasn’t right for the pass rusher. They had a chance at a real bargain, but they went for the sure thing. I argued that in this offseason, I was going to err on the side of pass rushers, and whether it was Malcom Brown or Randy Gregory, I wanted the sacks. So, you can imagine my surprise when 24 hours later, they had both players – Jones and Gregory. Teams every year claim they got a 1st rounder in the 2nd round and feel like they stole a pick, but ladies and gentlemen, there is a lot of spots on the internet that show Gregory was in the mix for the #1 pick overall - including this one from a guy I really think knows his stuff, Dane Brugler of CBSSports.com.

I never dreamed that Gregory would have fallen to #60 and honestly, at that point, a team that needs sack help to this extent could almost not afford to not take him there. Yet, about an hour before the pick, I did tweet this:



Let me explain. I have been accused of being a little too aggressive in my pursuit of a RB since losing DeMarco Murray. You will have to forgive me, but the job he did was not something that I believe can be replaced by any ol’ guy off the scrap heap. I want quality at RB, and that means running, receiving, and right up at the top, it means protecting Tony Romo from a blindside hit that ends everything. I really value a RB and at Pick #60, the Cowboys could have had my guy, Duke Johnson, Tevin Coleman, or Jay Ajayi to name a few.

But, between that tweet and this one, I had a talk with myself after looking at the players available:


And they did it. They took the best player available (by a mile) and did not panic about a RB because they calculated the risk vs reward values of each option and did what we tell them to do. The right thing. The smart thing. Really. I am not kidding. Taking a player in the NFL drug program before he even gets drafted is the smart thing.

Why? The risk vs reward on Randy Gregory at #60 is about the safest bet a team can ever make. It is a safer bet than Dez Bryant by a mile. It is a safer bet than Greg Hardy by 10 miles. The 60th pick of the NFL draft in 2014 (Kony Ealy) was given a 4-year contract with $1.2m guaranteed and a total value of $3.5m. So, for about 900k a year, you have what many thought would be a Top 5 pick until he failed a drug test at the combine. Would Duke Johnson have been safer and more comfortable for all involved? Yes. But, there comes a price where Gregory cannot be ignored. This is not a man with an arrest record, nor is it a man who is thought of as a bad guy. He has issues and those are worthy of attention for sure.

Here is my write-up on Gregory from back in January when I thought I was breaking down the #1 pick in the draft.

Bob McGinn of the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel is one of my favorite football writers on the planet and he writes up draft prospects as well as anyone. He wrote a feature on Randy Gregory that documented the issues and here is a small portion of it:

For decision-makers preparing to hand Gregory several millions in a rookie contract and risk losing their jobs if he flops, the pressure to make the proper evaluation is immense.

This month, the Journal Sentinel asked 21 personnel people for their choice as the best pass rusher in the draft regardless of position.

Gregory, who had 17½ sacks in two seasons for the Cornhuskers, easily finished first with 10 votes compared to five for Vic Beasley, 2½ for Dante Fowler, two for Leonard Williams and 1½ for Shane Ray.

“I’d say Von Miller’s better than him now,” said an NFC personnel director. “Gregory’s got more talent than Clay Matthews but isn’t as good because of the way Clay plays. Not as big as Ziggy Ansah or (Jason) Pierre-Paul, but he’s better.”

At the same time, 20 of the scouts (one declined the request) were asked to identify which player among the top defensive linemen and rush linebackers would have the best chance to bust.

Gregory was the runaway choice, drawing 11½ votes to 2½ for Ray, two for Beasley and one each for Arik Armstead, Carl Davis, Mario Edwards and Jordan Phillips.

Seven scouts voted for Gregory both as the No. 1 pass rusher and as the No. 1 most-likely player to bust.
Perhaps you can imagine a scenario under which you could get the best pass rusher in the draft – according to a panel of NFL scouts – at pick #60, but I cannot. If he is not found to be a monster of a human, you take him. And Gregory, however complex his case is, certainly is not thought of as anything more than a young kid with some young mistakes.

I would also invite you to check out this video by Brett Kollman which is an excellent 15 minute breakdown of Gregory’s skills. I doubt anyone has issues with whether he is a great prospect (I had him at #21 after the drug tests, but surely he was around the Top 10 without them), but this should further the case that he was too good not to take.



Does he fit the scheme perfectly? No. But, 2 things. 1) One source from the Cowboys told me to expect him to be up to 255 by camp, as they have plans to get him away from that curious sub-240 he has been walking around at and 2) scheme fit is vital, but coaches are able to figure things out where to use talents within a scheme.

And at the very, very worse, on passing downs, putting him on one edge and DeMarcus Lawrence on the other edge with Tyrone Crawford and Jeremy Mincey inside looks like a pretty capable 4 man rush to get to the QB. Put another way, I don’t think the Cowboys could have had a better top 2 picks than they did.

To get Jones and Gregory from this draft seems like injecting the blue chips into the defense as the plan was. A+.

Now, what about Chaz Green and what about Running Back? The Cowboys will work on the latter today and I will get on writing up Green later this week.

But, for now, I have nothing but the highest compliments for the Cowboys with Picks #27 and #60. I think they hit this one out of the park
 

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
120,221
Yeah, that was written before rounds 4-7.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
52,953
Yeah, that was written before rounds 4-7.
Yeah, our third day of the draft sucked. I'm ok with the MLBer in the fourth but the rest of the day blew for the most part. Ultimately though when you look at it you're talking about a fifth and couple sevenths. These aren't exactly top resources.
 
Top Bottom