- Joined
- Apr 7, 2004
- Messages
- 11,888
That tells me you're the one dragging our average down.I have no idea what this means.
It feels really weird to be inspired by videos about the Cowboys. I just don't know what to say...Maybe somebody can embed these. I couldn't.
Pretty cool videos.
[video]http://www.dallascowboys.com/video/2014/12/14/finishthefight[/video]
[video]http://www.dallascowboys.com/video/2014/12/19/finishthefight-tony-romo[/video]
This is what I have been doing at work to all the Cowboys haters today...It feels really weird to be inspired by videos about the Cowboys. I just don't know what to say...
Any manager that thinks only their determination is valid is a micromanager. Garrett was an OC before but his game plans and play calling were not right for this team. Since he couldn't see that for himself someone else helped him relinquish that responsibility. I can't speak for every other circumstance in the league but it was obvious with Dallas. He was smart to accept that decision.I don't think a guy who has been an offensive coordinator who continues to call plays when he becomes a head coach is a "micro manager". Then there are a ton of "micro managers" in the NFL.
Oh, well in that case...That tells me you're the one dragging our average down.
Chan Gailey refused to give up play calling and got fired, so it was definitely smart to accept what Jerry wanted.Any manager that thinks only their determination is valid is a micromanager. Garrett was an OC before but his game plans and play calling were not right for this team. Since he couldn't see that for himself someone else helped him relinquish that responsibility. I can't speak for every other circumstance in the league but it was obvious with Dallas. He was smart to accept that decision.
Yea. If we only needed 1 of the teams to lose for us to get the 1st seed, I would've been ok with going all out against the skins. I think rest will benefit some of our starters.There is very little to play for next week...we are pretty much the 3 seed. Rest everyone.
I'm off today, so that's what I'm doing.On another note, I have chosen not to work today. Instead I will enjoy all the Eagle memes on the web and listen to Dallas sports talk radio. Anybody on board?
Holy fucking chillbumps, Batman.Maybe somebody can embed these. I couldn't.
Pretty cool videos.
[video]http://www.dallascowboys.com/video/2014/12/14/finishthefight[/video]
[video]http://www.dallascowboys.com/video/2014/12/19/finishthefight-tony-romo[/video]
Because there would be a 3-way tie, and at that point H2H is out and it goes to conference record, which we have the worst of the 3 that would tie right now.It might have been answered already but why does Seattle get the 1st seed if they finish 12-4 with the same record as us if we win? We have the head to head over them, I know we lose to detroit in tiebreakers but what if they lose?
Taking the Cowboys out of the equation in my opinion the tie breaker should be opponents win percentage. The team with the tougher schedule in my opinion should get the higher seed. No idea if that would have any impact on the playoffs at all but I think that makes for a more logical tie breaker. I don't really understand the logic of punishing a team for having success against the AFC as opposed to the NFC. Although I'm sure it's based on the assumption that if you can beat teams in your own conference you have a better shot in the playoffs against your conference teams.Because there would be a 3-way tie, and at that point H2H is out and it goes to conference record, which we have the worst of the 3 that would tie right now.
Strength of schedule is a factor. It just comes after conference record in tie-breaking procedure.Taking the Cowboys out of the equation in my opinion the tie breaker should be opponents win percentage. The team with the tougher schedule in my opinion should get the higher seed. No idea if that would have any impact on the playoffs at all but I think that makes for a more logical tie breaker. I don't really understand the logic of punishing a team for having success against the AFC as opposed to the NFC. Although I'm sure it's based on the assumption that if you can beat teams in your own conference you have a better shot in the playoffs against your conference teams.
Not that it really matters, I'm thrilled to win the NFC East and as we have seen, teams off a bye have not done so hot in the NFL. There is something to be said for routine and going out and playing in that first round.
I just don't think you can rest the players under the circumstances. I get that the odds of the Cardinals and Seahawks losing seems like a long shot but it isn't that crazy. Seattle has lost to the Rams once already this season. The Cardinals have some of the worst QB play I've ever seen and I could see the 49ers at least making that game interesting.Yea. If we only needed 1 of the teams to lose for us to get the 1st seed, I would've been ok with going all out against the skins. I think rest will benefit some of our starters.