BipolarFuk
Demoted
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 11,464
So you guys are willing to sacrifice some liberty for some safety.
Got it.
Got it.
Okay.That took you a while. It's not. It's above. I don't blindly follow things like you do anyway.
Great comeback. Can I use it?Okay.
We should just put it in a judge's hands. Make a set of standards where it would be deemed acceptable and when the judge signs a warrant, he can also sign an order that a no-knock entry would be necessary based on the severity of the case. Not all suspected murders or rapists would need this treatment, but someone who's successfully avoided police for whatever reason it would be helpful.Are they going to flush the evidence of "Murder, rape, child molestation, etc." down the toilet???
You knock you identify yourself you wait a couple of seconds and if there's no answer you break the door down.
I'm fine with that.They should also make a law that if the police fuck up and no knocks the wrong house and they get blown the fuck away, there will be no prosecution.
I'd be down with that.They should also make a law that if the police fuck up and no knocks the wrong house and they get blown the fuck away, there will be no prosecution.
I'd be down with that.
I can get that for taking down a fugitive. They've already demonstrated they aren't interested in surrendering so taking them by surprise makes more sense than letting them choose fight or flight. I can dig that. If the exigent circumstances surrounding the warrant are related to safety rather than just evidence I don't have a problem with that warrant getting signed. Unfortunately, now we're out of disagreements. I'd better go learn about minor league baseball so I still have a thread to post in.Anyone suspected in a major crime who might be on the run. Murder, rape, child molestation, etc. There are still plenty of instances where it could be advantageous.
Yep.You are correct of course but that is the results of total polarization circumstances these days. Objectivity and reasonable problem identification takes a back seat to mud on the wall and non contextual presentations. I suppose sometimes the process is so deep seated that the search for suitability is no longer the thing to be achieved. When this happens it's just a Donnybrook of words and diatribes.
Added. This can apply to either side of a disagreement.
Just go in with the mindset that Joey Gallo is the baseball equivalent to Bobby Carpenter. That'll liven things up.Unfortunately, now we're out of disagreements. I'd better go learn about minor league baseball so I still have a thread to post in.
Haters gotta hate.Just go in with the mindset that Joey Gallo is the baseball equivalent to Bobby Carpenter. That'll liven things up.
You wanna do this, buddy?Just go in with the mindset that Joey Gallo is the baseball equivalent to Bobby Carpenter. That'll liven things up.
What the fuck, can you repeat the bolded part again?You are correct of course but that is the results of total polarization circumstances these days. Objectivity and reasonable problem identification takes a back seat to mud on the wall and non contextual presentations. I suppose sometimes the process is so deep seated that the search for suitability is no longer the thing to be achieved. When this happens it's just a Donnybrook of words and diatribes.
Added. This can apply to either side of a disagreement.
We're in the Raw zone for a reason, pal.You wanna do this, buddy?
Oooh, can we attack their union too? Or maybe all government unions?Someone needs to start a thread about how much teachers suck.
I wouldn't know what to say about that. I was a teacher in Texas. I never had a union.Oooh, can we attack their union too? Or maybe all government unions?